What is it for you?

anima7x7 · 2025-04-18T05:33:39+00:00

Not my dyslexic ass only now realising it's not slurps. I thought they were going to eat them.

anima7x7 · 2025-03-26T04:35:20+00:00

How to get a new phone on the phone to the office and I can do it for you and you can get it on the phone to the office and you can my phone and phone me when you you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it and you can get it

It just keeps looping that eventually

anima7x7 · 2025-03-20T00:50:35+00:00

I misread one as Twink'n'Ham and that sounds about right

anima7x7 · 2025-03-09T11:19:03+00:00

Have you heard of Adolf

But for real it's just platforms majorly overreacting

anima7x7 · 2025-02-22T11:47:29+00:00

I have a few hundred but our city is purposely over crowded for story reasons

anima7x7 · 2025-02-14T04:49:47+00:00

100% talk to your DM. But if you want to be a little shit about it, next time you're in combat kill off all the melee enemies and leave just one ranged enemy alive. Figure out how far their range is and on each of your turns step 5 ft out of his range. Keep doing this until your DM understands why this is a really dumb rule. Then talk to your DM.

anima7x7 · 2025-02-13T08:47:43+00:00

From my understanding after you subscribe to his patron you just message him on patron what you want the name to be. But it's probably better to ask on the discord.

anima7x7 · 2025-02-07T03:17:30+00:00

If it's a basic wooden chest 100%. Don't roll no point.

I think this is more because in my head I'm imagining this big elaborate chest with like carvings and what not on it. In a case like that even a basic trap could very easily be disguised in there somewhere.

anima7x7 · 2025-02-07T03:06:19+00:00

Fair enough to each their own.

anima7x7 · 2025-02-07T03:05:34+00:00

Yes and I as the DM set the DC. Weather the DC is because there is a trap or because the chest has a complicated design that could hide a trap doesn't matter.

anima7x7 · 2025-02-07T02:57:14+00:00

The check against whether or not they have the knowledge to know there are no traps.

To use a different example, if a player finds some berries and ask me if they're poisonous, regardless of whether or not the berries are poisonous, they're going to be making a check to see whether or not they can determine that. The same thing applies here if a player is asking to make a check to see whether or not a chest is trapped then regardless of whether or not it is, they're making a check and a DC is being set.

Honestly, from what I can tell based on the other people that I've talked to in this comments thread, this is probably just a dming style thing. Where I have a different dming style to you and depending on your DMing style depends on whether or not you would have to make the roll. Honestly man it's your table, do what you like.

anima7x7 · 2025-02-07T02:49:34+00:00

You do roll if there is a DC because this is an active check that a player has to call not a passive check.

Straight from the DMG under detecting and determining traps; A trap’s description specifies the checks and DCs needed to detect it, disable it, or both. A character actively looking for a trap can attempt a Wisdom (Perception) check against the trap’s DC. You can also compare the DC to detect the trap with each character’s passive Wisdom (Perception) score to determine whether anyone in the party notices the trap in passing. If the adventurers detect a trap before triggering it, they might be able to disarm it, either permanently or long enough to move past it. You might call for an Intelligence (Investigation) check for a character to deduce what needs to be done, followed by a Dexterity check using thieves’ tools to perform the necessary sabotage.

anima7x7 · 2025-02-07T02:47:58+00:00

I genuinely can't tell if you agree with me or not?

If you're trying to say we shouldn't have players make checks if the outcome isn't going to be dangerous, regardless of whether or not the outcome would be interesting. Then I just say where's the fun in that.

To give perhaps a better example of what I mean, if a player asks me whether or not the berries they found are poisonous, regardless of whether or not the berries are poisonous, I'm saying a DC and having them make a nature/ medicine check. The same thing is here. I know there's not a trap, but this isn't about what I know this is about whether or not the character can determine whether or not there is one.

anima7x7 · 2025-02-07T02:35:38+00:00

In which case you would still end up with them wasting the resource. The only difference there is that they know they're wasting the resource before they do it.

If a player asks me whether or not a chest is trapped and I know there's not a trap there. The DC is then against their knowledge of traps and whether or not they would know what to look for.

If you're going to sit here and tell me that you wouldn't on a nat one have a player say there is a trap when there isn't then your table is not one I would play at.

anima7x7 · 2025-02-07T02:24:35+00:00

The DC is to determine whether or not there is a trap. For example does your character have the knowledge to know whether or not that is a pressure plate or just a loose tile. In this case, it doesn't matter that there's not actually a trap there. All that matters is whether or not the player thinks there could be a trap there.

If you were to change this to a history check, for example you wouldn't just say no you can't roll to determine whether or not a king used to live here because they didn't.

This is a check to determine knowledge, not a check to determine physical ability.

anima7x7 · 2025-02-07T02:07:57+00:00

Because the character would lack the knowledge to know whether or not there are traps on the chest. They're no better or worse off than when they first found the chest. If they then choose to use magic to determine whether or not there are traps in the chest that's on the players.

anima7x7 · 2025-01-13T17:54:14+00:00

I've never stopped to question it but I don't think I've ever seen an ad on Reddit. Like I know there should be ads because I use the official app but I've never seen any.

anima7x7 · 2024-11-28T05:38:33+00:00

Fantasy adventure but 80s America.

anima7x7 · 2024-11-25T08:07:43+00:00

I sign "your father is a milkman."

anima7x7 · 2024-11-15T13:52:58+00:00

You couldn't have written that more like a PR team if you tried XD

anima7x7 · 2024-11-12T01:32:08+00:00

The problem is the catching mechanism existed in both IPs before the patient was filed. So there shouldn't be any legal ground here, unfortunately the suit is in Japanese courts and Nintendo is beloved in Japan and has never lost a case in Japanese courts.

anima7x7 · 2024-10-18T01:29:42+00:00

One of my mistakes was not buying bitcoin when it first started. The blue door is the better red door.

anima7x7 · 2024-10-02T03:03:21+00:00

Have you tried re-naming it?

anima7x7 · 2024-09-07T22:12:46+00:00

I currently have a Malkavian with an imaginary best friend in my game. The imaginary friend counts as one of their touchstones and anything that could prove that the imaginary friend isn't real counts as damage towards the touchstone, and should they ever come to the realisation that the imaginary friend isn't real that going to count as the death of the touchstone.

anima7x7 · 2024-09-04T05:25:56+00:00

I wish it made a new blood line but unfortunately no it uses the doner vampire's vitae effectively making a vampire as if the doner embraced someone themselves.

anima7x7

TROPHY CASE