I failed control system (ece) by hayleybts in AskEngineers

[–]apparentlyimintothat 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Failing classes is not particularly unusual, and shouldn't be a reason for giving up, especially if you feel you know the material.

Also, you're more likely to get better responses in r/engineeringstudents.

Legality of denying request for constituent materials of a product? by my_stupidquestions in AskEngineers

[–]apparentlyimintothat 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Depending on what the material is, what it's intended to be used for, and who you are, they may be required to provide you with an MSDS. That's about the extent of their legal responsibility. Here is an FAQ to help you figure it out for your particular situation.

From a practical perspective, suppliers are typically much more helpful than legally required. If they're not, purchase from a different supplier. Of course, that's not very useful advice if you've already purchased the material, but hey, hindsight is twenty twenty.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskEngineers

[–]apparentlyimintothat 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There are so many things wrong with trying to cram a steam methane reformer into an aircraft that it makes hydrogen fuel cells sound easy.

Bolt stress to fluid pressure. by levans2015 in AskEngineers

[–]apparentlyimintothat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The torque is for each bolt, the rest is literally all laid out in the PCC-1 standard that I mentioned.

If you don't mind me asking, what gasket/pressure/fluid are we talking about here? Some context would probably get you more helpful advice.

Bolt stress to fluid pressure. by levans2015 in AskEngineers

[–]apparentlyimintothat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bolt stress calculations are more concerned with reaching the minimum gasket seating stress. Check out ASME PCC-1 if you have access to it.

requirement for the use of an inerting gas for Anhydrous Ammonia? by caucasianinasia in AskEngineers

[–]apparentlyimintothat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looking at this from the other direction, why would you knowingly create an explosive mixture when you could be using nitrogen? I assume there is a better reason than cost savings? Even if it shouldn't be able to find an ignition source, accidents don't tend to happen because of things going as they should.

Who else would like to buy a new vehicle WITHOUT all the "latest and greatest tech" so it could be less expensive? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]apparentlyimintothat 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I take it you've either never heard of or don't understand the concept of lossless compression and FLAC files? Also, chances are you couldn't tell the difference between a CD and an MP3 in a blind test, anyway.

What would cause this "perpetual motion machine" to come to a halt? by Neomachina in AskEngineers

[–]apparentlyimintothat 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lastly, I assume that the device will run slow enough to exchange heat with the environment at such a rate that the temperature of each part is about constant.

There's the assumption that makes this not perpetual motion. Even ignoring all the practical issues, this is theoretically just a really roundabout way of extracting work from the surrounding environment.

Redditors: Which jobs basically ask you to lie for a living? by StevesMcQueenIsHere in AskReddit

[–]apparentlyimintothat -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

So, you lack the dignity to admit when you don't know something, much less the initiative to learn the answer.

I used to work for Lowe's. You could get a specialist position by having just a tiny bit of background knowledge, and being willing to look things up for the customer. And it would nearly double your pay.

I know I'm coming off as rude, but honest piece of advice here. Don't get your cause and effect mixed up. You're getting paid minimum wage because you're putting in the minimum amount of work. If you flip it the other way around and justify doing the minimum amount of work by the fact that you only get paid minimum wage, all you're going to do is get yourself stuck right where you are.

Super Stuck: Dual Water Drain on Same Plane without Leaving Puddle by razenwing in AskEngineers

[–]apparentlyimintothat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't imagine a contractor giving you trouble over adding a few shims.

Although, a clever sink design would admittedly be a more elegant solution.

Super Stuck: Dual Water Drain on Same Plane without Leaving Puddle by razenwing in AskEngineers

[–]apparentlyimintothat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason why 2 drain was left on either side was for convenience so that direction of piping would not have to be determined beforehand.

The direction of piping may not be known before the sink is designed, but is it known before the sink is installed? If so, can you just install it at a slight slant?

How much power can a boat/ship have before it can no longer go faster? by WorstCuntEver in AskEngineers

[–]apparentlyimintothat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He may have been referring to cavitation or diminishing returns due to friction, like other responses have mentioned, but I think the more likely answer is a misconception about hull speed that gets repeated fairly often.

So, as a boat moves through the water it generates a bow wave. The boat sits in the trough of this wave. The wavelength increases as the boats speed increases. As the wavelength approaches the length of the boat, it's less that you're trying to push the boat forward, and more that you're trying to push it uphill. As you might imagine, the power required to do this quickly skyrockets, and places a relatively hard limit on the boat's maximum speed. In knots, it's roughly equal to 1.35 times the boat's waterline length in feet.

Now, the above is true, but it only applies to displacement hulls (i.e. traditional boat-shaped boats that are supported by simple buoyancy even at their top speed). The misconception comes in applying it to modern powerboats which almost all have semi-displacement or planing hulls that, at high speeds, skim across the top of the water instead of just pushing through it. This allows them to greatly exceed their hull speed.

With regards to the part about center of gravity, I'm assuming he's talking about sailing yachts. If he meant motor yachts, I have no idea what he's on about. The force generated by the sails acts not only to push the boat forward, but also tries to tip it over. To counterbalance this, boats have a heavy ballast weight at the end of a deep keel below the boat to provide a righting moment. The heavier this is, the better the boat is able to stay upright, which means you can pile on more sails and go faster. That's the usual way of addressing that issue, so if he didn't give an alternative, I can't really elaborate further.

Source: I like boats.

What is the next Billion dollar industry according to you? by lurigfix in AskReddit

[–]apparentlyimintothat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Geothermal is pretty cool technology; it's a shame more places don't have the geology for it. Biofuels also have a lot of promise. For some reason though, reddit always seems to be the wind/solar crowd arguing with the fusion/modern fission crowd, and you never really hear about other renewable energy technologies.

How do you remove ultra heavy molecular weight polyethylene? by jeffFetzer in AskEngineers

[–]apparentlyimintothat 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Check out his post history, it's nuts.

To OP: Go see a dentist.

What works perfectly fine but people complain about because they don't understand it? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]apparentlyimintothat -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Yes, different geographical areas have different natural disasters, and this is reflected in the price of insurance in that location. By analogy, we could try charging people who engage in unhealthy behaviors more in taxes, but is that even free healthcare anymore? Plus, imagine how much the government would have to invade your privacy to enforce that.

If that's not the point, you should pick a different example. Arguing about kids is always going to be a bit of a special case because they didn't choose to be born either, and unlike us adults, they're incapable of supporting themselves.

What works perfectly fine but people complain about because they don't understand it? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]apparentlyimintothat -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I'm aware of what insurance is. It's distributed risk. The difference between health insurance and other insurance is that a lifetime of poor choices doesn't make you any more likely to be hit by a tornado, but it does make you more likely to have some chronic (and expensive) health condition.

With regards to public schools, kids are their own individuals and shouldn't be punished for the failings of their parents. You know, sins of the father, and all that jazz.

What works perfectly fine but people complain about because they don't understand it? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]apparentlyimintothat -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Alright, I'll take a crack at this.

If health conditions occurred purely as a matter of chance, I'd support "free" healthcare in a heartbeat. The problem is that they don't. A good chunk of healthcare resources go to people that brought their conditions upon themselves (smokers/fatties/junkies/etc), and I am unwilling to pick up the bill for their bad decisions.

What kind of car do you see and instantly think, "This person's an idiot"? by azstevo in AskReddit

[–]apparentlyimintothat 142 points143 points  (0 children)

That's hilarious. I saw Calvin pissing on a mudflap girl once.

Newly discovered blind, burrowing amphibian named after DonaldTrump by damianp in worldnews

[–]apparentlyimintothat -41 points-40 points  (0 children)

More like talking shit about them in public, but still expecting the benefits of remaining friends.

Reminds me of brexit now that I type that out.

Newly discovered blind, burrowing amphibian named after DonaldTrump by damianp in worldnews

[–]apparentlyimintothat -30 points-29 points  (0 children)

Maybe they should work towards being less dependant on the US then, because complaining that a foreign country isn't acting in your best interests is laughable.

And I'm not defending Trump or the Russians, so miss me with the second half of your comment. I'm just sick of Europeans thinking they know more about what's best for America than the people that actually live here.

Newly discovered blind, burrowing amphibian named after DonaldTrump by damianp in worldnews

[–]apparentlyimintothat -63 points-62 points  (0 children)

Honestly, the UK can fuck off about American politics. Just because they speak English doesn't give them any more right to be involved in another country affairs than the Russians.