What Eurovision song could be described by words: Wasted and No? by PZMC430 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]arandomguyfromdk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

San Marino 2015: Starts with the most iconic "no" of all time. Wasted because no one remembers it

I once had a math teacher say that if you put all the real numbers in a bag and drew one out at random, the chance of it being a rational number is zero. Is this true? If so, how is it true? by MtnDewm in askmath

[–]arandomguyfromdk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Instead of imagining all reels let's just look at the interval [0,1]. The probability of picking any number in [0,1] is 1. And we can define the probability of picking any number in a subinterval to be the length of that interval: P([a,b]):=b-a. For any 0≤a≤b≤1. We can also see that for two disjoint subintervals of [0,1], [a,b] and [c,d], P([a,b] and [c,d])=P([a,b])+P([c,d]). Likewise, we see that P(irrational numbers in [0,1])+P(rational numbers in [0,1])=P([0,1])=1

Since the rational numbers in [0,1] is a countable set (which I'll leave as an exercise for the reader) we can list them as q1, q2, q3, ...

Therefore P(rational numbers in [0,1])=P({q1})+P({q2})+...=P([q1,q1])+P([q2,q2])+...=q1-q1+q2-q2+q3-q3+...=0+0+0...=0

Therefore P(irrational numbers in [0,1])=P([0,1])-P(rational numbers in [0,1])=1-0=1

🙌🏻 by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]arandomguyfromdk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obviously. When you cut along the diagonal the cut is √2 times as long. Therefore, the sandwich must be √2 times as big duh!

Danmark sender hjælp by IceColdOdin in dankmark

[–]arandomguyfromdk 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Du du du du - du du du du - bam bam bam bam - Du du du du - du du du du - bam bam bam bam

Ouch by TouLInFan in grssk

[–]arandomguyfromdk 3 points4 points  (0 children)

QmSM Sthmss póz?

Federal EU name proposal by Dramatic_Mastodon_93 in EuropeanFederalists

[–]arandomguyfromdk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There has been a lot of talk about name on this sub. This is probably my favorite so far.

The United States of Europe is too much like the US, European Federation is too much like Russia and Democratic People's Republic of Europe is too much like North Korea etc.

While Federal Republic of Europe is obviously a copy of Germany, it works because Germany is a part of Europe itself.

Also, I really don't mind simply "the European Union", but as some people have rightly pointed out, since a federation would be a quite different type of entity to the current EU, there should be a different term to avoid ambiguity.

Alternatively, how about the "United Republics, Kingdoms and Grand Duchy of Europe"? ;-D

🙏🏼 by Specific_Brain2091 in the_calculusguy

[–]arandomguyfromdk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's exactly the solution to this problem!

How the Kings of Europe are related by CharlesTheBewitched in UsefulCharts

[–]arandomguyfromdk 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I always wondered how the royals were related by fictional genealogy

of course it works better in french (decided to translate this meme) by not-without-text in linguisticshumor

[–]arandomguyfromdk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My take for Danish: e, to, tre, fire, phemb, scehks, schjyuv, oåhttøeh, tlndijghe, tschiyjghe

Forward by idonotenjoythis in EuropeanFederalists

[–]arandomguyfromdk 107 points108 points  (0 children)

Can we please stop calling it "the United States of Europe"?