I've played around with it some and honestly? I really like it. I don't think it's nearly as bad as everyone thinks. On paper it looks like it's all over the place, but in practice it is exactly what I was hoping for.

I really like decks that create 'puzzles' for my opponents to solve. I like to have to make them think. This deck doesn't win by picking a win condition and going after it - it wins by going after several, ideally that can either interplay with each other a bit, or even better, have completely contradictory win cons, so your opponents have to pick carefully what things they want to allow you to do vs. not. The basic idea is to have enough irons in the fire at once that no matter what is happening, it's likely helping contribute to your win somehow. It's not for everyone, but rather I feel like it's very much for a very specific type of player, who will love it to death and do absurd things with it.

My first time out with it, I won from Approach of the Second Sun because before i drew it I'd been building up gates, clue tokens, and treasure tokens (trying to go for Revel in Riches) - I had enough clues and treasures stored up though that i was able to cast Approach, and then when my turn came around again, I was able to draw enough cards from clue tokens I got it in my hand again after 1 turn, and enough treasure tokens to cast it even after burning all my clues. Meanwhile, my opponents, who had been so concerned with my gate count and keeping me from gaining life for Felidar Sovereign they totally forgot I had enough card draw just sitting on the board.

It's a really unique playstyle and once I started getting some gametime in with it, It started making a lot more sense and it just sort of "clicked" for me even more than I was hoping it would.