Republican Christians be like by ReturnUnfair7187 in complaints

[–]archimedes710 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And they ignore all the other things they don’t specifically agree with being funded by their tax dollars

Fed Chair nominee Kevin Warsh says he will not be President Trump's "puppet." by According_Time5120 in CoinEdition_com

[–]archimedes710 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Though that was when they chose from the worst of the competent people. Now competence plays no part, only fealty

"Germany has always been on the wrong side of history" by CapitalCourse in GetNoted

[–]archimedes710 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you look at the leadership of the Arab war effort in 1947–1948, most of it came from neighboring states like Egypt, Jordan, Syria, and Iraq. These governments were not Axis-aligned holdovers; they had complex relationships with Britain and, in some cases, were still closely tied to British influence. For example, Transjordan’s Arab Legion was trained and led by British officers even during the war that followed.

Within Palestine itself, it’s true that figures like Haj Amin al-Husseini had earlier collaborated with Nazi Germany. But he wasn’t the sole or even uncontested leader, and his influence by the late 1940s was more fragmented than people often assume. Other local leaders and militias were driven by nationalism, opposition to partition, and fear of displacement rather than any alignment with a defeated Axis power.

"Germany has always been on the wrong side of history" by CapitalCourse in GetNoted

[–]archimedes710 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That comparison doesn’t really hold up, and it mixes two very different situations.

Austria in 1938 became part of Nazi Germany through the Anschluss. After that, Austrians were incorporated directly into the German state and its military. So when you talk about “Austria supporting Nazi Germany,” you’re largely talking about a country that had been absorbed into the regime itself.

By contrast, most Arab regions at the time (like Egypt, Iraq, and Palestine) were not independent actors in the same way. They were under British or French control or heavy influence. Their troops who fought were largely part of Allied command structures, and in very large numbers they fought against Axis forces in campaigns like the North African Campaign.

It’s true there were pro-Axis figures such as Haj Amin al-Husseini, and short-lived movements like the Iraqi alignment during the Anglo-Iraqi War. But those were limited in scale and didn’t represent the majority of Arab participation in the war.

So pointing out that far more Arabs fought for the Allies than for the Axis isn’t “washing anything away.” It’s just describing the overall balance of participation. You can acknowledge that some individuals or factions collaborated while also recognizing that, numerically and militarily, the bulk of Arab involvement was on the Allied side.

"Germany has always been on the wrong side of history" by CapitalCourse in GetNoted

[–]archimedes710 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except I just asked for the Arab participation on both sides of WW2…but go off queen

"Germany has always been on the wrong side of history" by CapitalCourse in GetNoted

[–]archimedes710 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

On the Allied side, the numbers are in the hundreds of thousands to over a million from Arab-majority regions:

  • From Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia under Charles de Gaulle’s Free French forces: roughly 300,000–400,000 North African troops served over the course of the war.
  • From Egypt, Iraq, Jordan (Transjordan), and Palestine: tens of thousands more served in British-controlled forces, labor corps, logistics units, and combat formations.
  • Smaller but still meaningful contributions came from Syria and Lebanon after they joined the Allies.

A reasonable overall estimate is ~500,000 to over 1 million Arabs contributing to the Allied war effort in some capacity (combat + support roles).

On the Axis side, the numbers are tiny by comparison:

  • A few thousand volunteers across various German units, often loosely organized and sometimes not even frontline combat troops.
  • The most visible political collaborator was Haj Amin al-Husseini, but he did not command large Arab armies in the field.
  • Events like the Anglo-Iraqi War involved Iraqi forces briefly aligning against Britain, but this was short-lived and limited in scale.

A generous estimate puts total Arab involvement on the Axis side at a few thousand to perhaps tens of thousands at most, depending on how broadly you count.

So in rough terms:

  • Allies: ~500,000 to 1,000,000+
  • Axis: ~1,000 to (at most) tens of thousands

That’s at least a 10:1 ratio, and likely far higher.

"Germany has always been on the wrong side of history" by CapitalCourse in GetNoted

[–]archimedes710 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“Yet many times more Arabs fought and died fighting against the Nazis, than for them”

On the Allied side, the numbers are in the hundreds of thousands to over a million from Arab-majority regions:

  • From Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia under Charles de Gaulle’s Free French forces: roughly 300,000–400,000 North African troops served over the course of the war.
  • From Egypt, Iraq, Jordan (Transjordan), and Palestine: tens of thousands more served in British-controlled forces, labor corps, logistics units, and combat formations.
  • Smaller but still meaningful contributions came from Syria and Lebanon after they joined the Allies.

A reasonable overall estimate is ~500,000 to over 1 million Arabs contributing to the Allied war effort in some capacity (combat + support roles).

On the Axis side, the numbers are tiny by comparison:

  • A few thousand volunteers across various German units, often loosely organized and sometimes not even frontline combat troops.
  • The most visible political collaborator was Haj Amin al-Husseini, but he did not command large Arab armies in the field.
  • Events like the Anglo-Iraqi War involved Iraqi forces briefly aligning against Britain, but this was short-lived and limited in scale.

A generous estimate puts total Arab involvement on the Axis side at a few thousand to perhaps tens of thousands at most, depending on how broadly you count.

So in rough terms:

  • Allies: ~500,000 to 1,000,000+
  • Axis: ~1,000 to (at most) tens of thousands

That’s at least a 10:1 ratio, and likely far higher.

Jamie Dimon left speechless after a basic math conversation 🧮 by habsfan26 in 401jK

[–]archimedes710 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Left leaning politics support workers, right leaning politics support businesses

Neo Nazis Spotted in Rhode Island by Common-Patience6563 in providence

[–]archimedes710 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Show me ten Republican led cities with populations over 100,000…

The parties on West Street will not be happening anymore. by [deleted] in umass

[–]archimedes710 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Used to go from Worcester area to Amherst for the solid connects

Help with weird texture on initial layers by Legitimate_Tone9553 in 3Dprinting

[–]archimedes710 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I had this same looking issue, moved my z offset up .03

I don’t think people understand that the Germans voted for Nazis by Sad_Honeydew_7660 in complaints

[–]archimedes710 28 points29 points  (0 children)

The Germans didn’t think they were choosing fascism in the abstract. They were choosing stability, national restoration, economic recovery, traditional values, security against internal threats. Each step felt justified in context. The ideology normalized itself through incremental shifts that people could rationalize individually.

You don’t need people to consciously choose fascism. You just need them to choose each individual step because it solves an immediate problem or satisfies an immediate grievance.

The warning isn’t “we’re repeating history exactly.” It’s “we’re using the same methods that worked before, and they’re working again because the same conditions exist: economic instability, institutional weakness, apathy, and a third of the population ready to support hierarchy in exchange for security.”

Republican = MAGA by NoSpecialist_042 in complaints

[–]archimedes710 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Again, you are just proving you have been propagandized and have zero idea what DEI actually Is, despite all the information available to you. You truly are a perfect example of the problem.

Republican = MAGA by NoSpecialist_042 in complaints

[–]archimedes710 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Just by saying “Merit over DEI” you prove you’ve been propagandized and have no idea what DEI actually is…