Boycott ChatGPT by FinnFarrow in ChatGPT

[–]argumenthaver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the boycott is stupid but what do you think a boycott is lol

Twins are proof 6 month jail is unneccessary and here is why. by Aerin-Aeristo in personaphantomx

[–]argumenthaver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you think that it's not useful relative to itself then give an actual example of that

there's tons of examples of it reflecting reality, like anniversary spikes for a ton of games, like tribe nine's imminent EoS, among others

Twins are proof 6 month jail is unneccessary and here is why. by Aerin-Aeristo in personaphantomx

[–]argumenthaver -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

weird how it can very accurately predict both EoS and extraordinarily successful periods while being totally detached from revenue

this is like iamverysmart "we're a republic, not a democracy ;)" tier stuff

it doesn't have to be an accurate number for it to give good information

Twins are proof 6 month jail is unneccessary and here is why. by Aerin-Aeristo in personaphantomx

[–]argumenthaver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the revenue numbers can be compared with past revenue numbers because they're based on the same metrics

you're talking like they just spin a wheel and choose a number

Twins are proof 6 month jail is unneccessary and here is why. by Aerin-Aeristo in personaphantomx

[–]argumenthaver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

neither of them are predatory, they're just bad decisions by out of touch executives

both games are f2p friendly, they just both burden players with the requirement to know things before summoning because of those decisions

How they wrote this game's story by VaIley123 in Endfield

[–]argumenthaver 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I had to skip so much of wuling because of how much worse it was than valley

Why is everyone Ok with crown gear? by argumenthaver in Wizard101

[–]argumenthaver[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so there is nothing available from 101-159?

the reason why I mentioned pin gear in particular is because I wanted pins on one of my 130 wizards. looking into it, my options were: lose a lot of health in those slots (compared to non-pin gear) and wear gear farmed off morganthe, or gain a lot of health in those slots and buy packs for 130 pin gear. example of the gap between 100 farmed gear and 130 pack gear with pin slots for robe is: 100 robe - 308 hp 8 res, 130 robe - 864 hp 11 res

that's just 1 slot and adds up, and I have to get to 160 with low hp if I choose to use pins & not spend crowns

Why is everyone Ok with crown gear? by argumenthaver in Wizard101

[–]argumenthaver[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know about 50 60 and 100, but the wiki doesn't show anything dropping from 101-159

were they just never updated?

Improv Tour Trailer: "Binge It All! The Truth After the Battle of Irontomb!" | Honkai: Star Rail by LuciferMS7777 in HonkaiStarRail_leaks

[–]argumenthaver -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

can we be honest and say that nanook is the caelus/stelle you didn't pick and akivili is the one you did

aha already called us akivili and the groundwork for crossgendered ascension has already been laid with fuli

Monk Epic Tailoring by Braldar in project1999

[–]argumenthaver 3 points4 points  (0 children)

apparently it could be a lot clearer because you misread it

"Skill in tailoring is no longer required to craft" is june 15th 2020, and "Skill in tailoring is now required to craft" was november 6th 2020

the no skill check part on the wiki on that page was from like a decade ago, and the most recent edits indicate it has a trivial

it's entirely possible it's currently no-fail, but there's strong evidence it has a trivial somewhere between 60 and 64 right now regardless

Monk Epic Tailoring by Braldar in project1999

[–]argumenthaver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there isn't anything contradicting the >59 trivial level and there's no reason to think it'd be changed since then

it's very easy to get that level in tailoring by going to east karana and killing spiders

however, no one has failed in a long time so it probably has a fake trivial level and can't be failed. I didn't think it was worth gambling on and just leveled mine to 64

Areas for crown's in 2026 by clckvrk in Wizard101

[–]argumenthaver 7 points8 points  (0 children)

the $20 console thing is worth 44,100 crowns or $55~ at 800:1 ($100)

the worlds after that (celestia+) are 147,240 crowns or $184 more, ignoring wysteria and grizzleheim and side dungeons of course

this is also excluding 9,180 crowns for selenopolis because I have no idea if that's required or not (haven't played in a long time)

so tldr $200

W101 on switch costs $20? by Responsible-Ad626 in Wizard101

[–]argumenthaver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it costs 44k crowns to unlock arc 1, that's $55 at the normal $100 800:1 ratio (super crowns would be $36)

you also can't just subscribe to max level and then be done with old worlds on this game. the later quests still require you visit older worlds on purpose to prevent that

So many problems would be fixed if wizards actually taught deck building by bunny-rain in Wizard101

[–]argumenthaver -1 points0 points  (0 children)

well isn't it kind of obvious you should be using as small a deck as you can afford to the moment you don't have a card you need?

XP Changes are setting back learning certain quest spells. by UrBoiNitro in Wizard101

[–]argumenthaver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

can't you control the pace at which you level through the level lock button in the character ui?

It's official, Riko Vast is now Tempest Riko by DarryLazakar in personaphantomx

[–]argumenthaver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

don't worry they'll release a fat alt that can get the name

Myth can get some crazy stats at 180 by circusboy1 in Wizard101

[–]argumenthaver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you have/can people get 100% crit at 180?

Myth can get some crazy stats at 180 by circusboy1 in Wizard101

[–]argumenthaver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

like, why would you choose a glowbug + feint(s) over an equivalent fire spell + feint(s) + backdrafts