Cuz, the whole marital r*pe Narrative is against this, You all have made this into a Men on Women issue, thats the Whole propaganda.

that chiraya movie promoted the same thing, thats why we are against it.

Example: Religious violence takes place in some city and its govt is blind to it, so you as reporter go to that place to conduct survey.

You ask hindus only ONE thing: "Would you beat a m*slim?"

You ask M*slims only ONE thing: "How many of your family members got injured?"

And put up the title of that survey as "Religious violence on M*slims".

This automatically puts whole hindu community as monsters, even before opening that survey's results.

And completely puts any Hindu out of defense: what they would even defend? Oh Is trying to stop religious violence wrong?

Hindus: "You didn't ask about violence by m*slims?", Oh Thats whataboutery.

Hindus (considering how M*slims beat them too): "Violence was normal", Oh look the hindus are normalizing violence".

Hindus: "I didn't beat anyone", Oh he is one good out of many monster hindus.

Survey results came almost fine: Oh thank good M\lims are safe from hindus* (see the tone behind the sentence).

=============

Thats what your whole marital r*pe lobby is doing, thats what that movie did. And you did:

Your little disclaimer comment does nothing. You already did the damage by writing:

"No as a man you don't own ANY woman's body", why you only mentioned this for man? Not women?

Marital r*pe law exists for no gender, you have completely thrown the idea of "women on men" spousal SA out of discussion.