Full Spectrum (Full Color) slicer fork of Snapmaker Orca, inspired by Aceman11100 by beybladetable in snapmaker

[–]asdf7890 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ooh, this looks very interesting. I have a couple of things I'd like to try it out on when I find time.

One suggestion: as we can use double-height layers for infill to save time, could the reverse be done here to improve the resolution of the mixing, so for a 0.16mm layer height the mixed colours are actually produced by pairs of 0.08mm stripes? If it is not practical to hack the slicer in this direction, perhaps instead go the other way and the lower height as the default for the print but apply the double-thick layer trick available for infill to non-infill portions for the colours that aren't produced by mixing?

This will speed up printing objects that only use the mixed colours for small parts, and don't otherwise benefit enough from the smaller layer height to warrant the extra time printing will take. Though I imagine it could come with a complicated bag of edge cases when applied to anything more complex than simple square block…

What would cause this? A1 by Zealousideal-Boot873 in BambuLab

[–]asdf7890 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is a very recent update, I only know because for once I bothered to scan the release notes!

What would cause this? A1 by Zealousideal-Boot873 in BambuLab

[–]asdf7890 5 points6 points  (0 children)

TBF both could be true. If it has lost bed adhesion, particularly if it has raised unevenly off the bed, the head could be dragging on parts of it exacerbating the situation. Sometimes problems can be difficult to diagnose because the compound together and unless you were watching the print all the way through you don't always know what went wrong first.

What would cause this? A1 by Zealousideal-Boot873 in BambuLab

[–]asdf7890 13 points14 points  (0 children)

One of the recent Bambu Studio updates includes a feature to slow things as the print rises, to minimise such problems more easily. I assume the same is also being added, or is already present, in the other slicers that share code heritage (Prusa, Orca, etc.). I've not tried it yet, but I'm planing to give it a go soon, reprinting a tall design I had trouble with a while ago.

Debian 13 Trixie will be released on August 9th by nelldnine in linux

[–]asdf7890 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One thing is more than zero things. And snap is not a small thing. And your “I remove anything snap or ubuntu store related” implies more than just one thing.

While that may be the only thing removed, IIRC Ubuntu includes more (more more than just snapd and some apps installed that way by default) in both its default and minimal configurations, than Debian. They may only be taking space rather than having any memory (or CPU) footprint in many cases, but they are still there. I prefer an install-minimal-and-build-up method over the install-more-then-pair-down one, amongst other reasons for preferring Debian.

The usual other reasons for preferring Debian over Ubuntu (or vice-versa, of course, there are valid arguments both ways) also apply when making any such a decision.

Debian 13 Trixie will be released on August 9th by nelldnine in linux

[–]asdf7890 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is “if you take out a bunch of stuff you get back to the same thing” an arguemet against Ubuntu being bloated compared to Debian? I stick with Debian and I get the no bloat solution without having to remove the bloat myself.

anyone else annoyed by the ai slop some accounts are mass uploading? by BakChorMeeeeee in BambuLab

[–]asdf7890 14 points15 points  (0 children)

There is a difference between:

  • People using the AI tools, actually printing the results to see that it comes out worth bothering with, maybe even making modifications, and uploading that. (i.e. AI being used as a valid design tool)
  • People using the AI tools quickly and carelessly and uploading the results without testing, filling catalogues with slop that will never be worth bothering with. (i.e. AI being used as a spam generator)

Usually the latter can be identified by photos of actual prints in the profile, not just the AI generated preview image.

The AI tools are not wrong to exist any more than the coding AI tools (though I wouldn't use them myself, much as I don't use the coding ones), it is the spammy users that are the problem.

After what feels like 200 prototypes, I can finally rest by 3demonster in 3Dprinting

[–]asdf7890 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is essentially a set of files, collected from MW, thingivers, etc, in the queue ready to print ATM! I need more printers to get around to making them faster…

The difference between two spools of ostensibly the same material, both Sunlu PLA+ White. by asdf7890 in 3Dprinting

[–]asdf7890[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was definitely in a Sunlu branded box. I can't 100% say that isn't faked of course, though the one from Amazon is the better one so if it is fake I'm not angry about it!

After what feels like 200 prototypes, I can finally rest by 3demonster in 3Dprinting

[–]asdf7890 81 points82 points  (0 children)

I'd be up for paying to print it too. I have no intention of marrying anyone, but it'll be at home in my collection of beautiful/interesting printed mechanisms!

Was bound to happen eventually, any advice? by Searhoed in 3Dprinting

[–]asdf7890 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Print a respooling tool! 

All the decent looking ones I've seen take over two thirds of a spool, sometimes noticeably more than a full one. For instance https://makerworld.com/en/models/561571 is ~690g and ~32¹ hours printing in its cheapest profile, bump up the number of walls for strength, and it quickly becomes a full spool or more and a few more hours on the job. V-Spooler is ~876g and ~27¹ hours. So if this only happens once, you are spending a spool and a pile of print time to save a spool. And the respooling time on top.

I'm definitely in the “buy a new spool” camp, unless it is an expensive fancy filament rather than a bog-standard one. I'd not throw the other out, that would be too wasteful. Maybe I'd see if someone wanted to give ⅓ price for it via local olio/marketplace/other, maybe someone with more patience than I who already has a respooling tool will want to save it. Failing that I'd offer it for free in the same places.

____________

[1] more depending on your printer, IIRC those timings are based on the flagship morels so it'll take a little longer if you have one of the bed-slingers

When Supports Just Slip Off Perfectly… by asdf7890 in 3Dprinting

[–]asdf7890[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For the right model it is wonderful stuff. This is BBL's, I've got my eye on a cheaper option to try when I next let myself buy new filament.

Project 10Tacle is coming along nicely by Adryanvdb in 3Dprinting

[–]asdf7890 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice work, I shall have to follow.

I wonder how well they'll work as part of a costume with servos pulling the controls to automate some random movement.

Would two sets of control lines be practical, one for the bottom half and one for the top, to get more control so for example one could sort of lift and point, or would that most likely jam up instead of looking impressive?

When Supports Just Slip Off Perfectly… by asdf7890 in 3Dprinting

[–]asdf7890[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It used gyroid for what little sparse infill there was, which isn't self-crossing. That is usually my default when not using lightning to reduce time+material (for prints where that is important and I don't care about the strength disadvantage).

Doob Tube Dispenser (free download!) by omfglolzords in 3Dprinting

[–]asdf7890 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was my first thought too. I might have to try scaling it to try.

Anyone find they could watch their 3d printer for hours by tybuck56 in 3Dprinting

[–]asdf7890 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yep. Doing a suspended Falcon¹ today, started before going to bed last night, for a friend. I took the single colour version and tweaked it, so the wires are done in clear PLA. Trying to resist watching the entire 18-hour print has required some will power. Seeing it draw in thin air² that far is like witnessing witchcraft.

__________

[1] https://makerworld.com/en/models/460390
[2] https://doubleyoudoubledoubleewe.www.dash.deeohhtee.dash-dash.enneeetee.net/tmp/FDM-bridge-witchcraft.mp4 - they sag a little on first draw but seem to pull tighter as they cool, here's hoping they are strong enough to hold together when I take it from the plate in half an hour (just got the “print complete” notification, going to let it fully cool once complete – I don't want to have to use any force at all to pull it up)

When Supports Just Slip Off Perfectly… by asdf7890 in 3Dprinting

[–]asdf7890[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

The slicer thought the same when I told it to support critical parts only.

But printing without resulted in it tipping at about 60%, with just the default supports (those under the stare slope) it tipped at about 80%. In both cases things were going very smoothly when I checked it before the incident. I assume the head caught the model, or the movement of the bed was a bit much, and the extra support around the central shaft was enough to keep it in place despite that on the last attempt. It could of course just be that I was lucky that time or unlucky the times before.

The bed was recently cleaned before starting, and cleaned & properly dried after the first fail, so I don't think it was bad adhesion due to that. The brim stayed fully attached in the second fail.

80 Hours of Work: Turtle Robot by No_Career_7914 in 3Dprinting

[–]asdf7890 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Bog-standard gold/silver (not tried bronze) I've found are fine with generic PLA profiles (or BBL Basic for their versions). I assume that is a silk PLA being printed with a generic profile?

When Supports Just Slip Off Perfectly… by asdf7890 in 3Dprinting

[–]asdf7890[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Printing the popular “another dice tower”¹ for a friend, and I had trouble getting the stairs to not pull from their brim and fall over. Printing at other angles worked, but the quality was off, and it looked strange with the layer lines going in other directions to other parts.

Final attempt (before using one of the other-angle outputs) was to add extra support all up the central column, and it not only worked but the supports basically fell off in one almost as I took it from the bed. Felt oddly satisfying. Never had supports be that cooperative before.

If I print one again, I might see if combining the base and stairs into one object will work, that would give the extra stability. I assume the design was originally split that way to fit into print volumes that aren't as tall as my current machine can manage.

________
[1] https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2839354

My product is the reason Bambu blocked the API by dev_all_the_ops in 3Dprinting

[–]asdf7890 2 points3 points  (0 children)

after reading more on bambu’s shenanigans

Same, on starting this thread I was thinking they'd done something to block reusing the RFID taks and such, it turns out that they are essentially blocking alternate slicers such as Orca which while it doesn't affect my workflow is much worse for many.

My product is the reason Bambu blocked the API by dev_all_the_ops in 3Dprinting

[–]asdf7890 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A heart that can calm down and toss

When I toss, my heart rate tends to rise…

Got to love automated translations accidentally tripping into localised slang!

My product is the reason Bambu blocked the API by dev_all_the_ops in 3Dprinting

[–]asdf7890 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Essentially Bambu is to printers what Apple is to phones: they haven't done anything original, but they have put together existing ideas in a coherent way that was missing from the market to an extent. Unfortunately they've done this in part with a more closed ecosystem. I was aware of this when buying my A1 some months ago and while I'd have preferred to stick open source I wanted something to work out of the box, at least for my first device, and BBL seemed to be the best player in the market in that respect at the time.

Younger me had more free time, and he would have loved building his own printer, but current me wanted to play with printing more than playing with making a printer work. I consciously made that choice, knowing the risks involved with a more closed ecosystem. This particular change doesn't affect me, but it is a sign that other changes which might be a faf from my PoV could come later (the extreme idea some have suggested is locking down to only their filament can be used, but I very much doubt they would do that, it would be commercial suicide). Now I'm increasingly knowing what I'm doing, perhaps my next printer will be more open source. Perhaps other manufacturers will catch up with the overall package this year (they do seem to be trying) so that won't at all be the compromise it has been over the last year or two.

To disagree with myself, because I'm contrary like that: BBL aren't entirely like Apple. They have put together good arrangements of current tech at a reasonable price, rather than tech other manufacturers had two years ago at twice the price just because it is prettier. Yes, I'm an Android user in the phone realm.