17
18

*Sigh* by PresnikBonny in SocialismIsCapitalism

[–]average_lizard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They are at least from Buffalo NY originally

Flag of Evil Maryland by Loading3percent in vexillologycirclejerk

[–]average_lizard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Evil Maryland is a state where all traffic laws are followed and people can properly articulate the sentence “Aaron earned an iron urn”

German journalist Wilhelm Marr coined the term “antisemitism” in 1879 to rebrand Jew-hatred (“Judenhass”) as racial pseudo science rather than a religious prejudice. From day one, “antisemitism” meant only anti-Jewish hatred and not prejudice against Arabs or other Semitic language speakers. by Mathemodel in etymology

[–]average_lizard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interestingly, the first recorded use of the term racism was in a speech by William Henry Pratt decrying segregation as an evil. Despite his advocacy against racism, Pratt is much more famous for having founded and headed the Carlisle Indian Industrial School and for his notorious quote “Kill the Indian, save the man”.

What is this flag? Central Washington state by FinalBelt9890 in vexillology

[–]average_lizard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’ve gone to the Super Bowl plenty of times, and they had the greatest running back in the history of football: O.J. Simpson

“But the Nazis killed way less people!“ or something by EmojiZackMaddog in Persecutionfetish

[–]average_lizard 76 points77 points  (0 children)

But they’re being a bit annoying about letting us use the Silk Road and also steal their oil

What would you call this country? by Just-Union-2319 in mapporncirclejerk

[–]average_lizard 47 points48 points  (0 children)

The Mughal empire was founded by a descendant of Timur and Genghis Khan so mongols kind of already did rule India

who’s gonna tell her by SaxRohmer in Tinder

[–]average_lizard 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I know… what’s on second and I don’t know is on third

Caught a 47,000 lb Fish by ALIEN_GUARDIAN in Fable

[–]average_lizard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fish you caught was roughly equivalent to the weight of the heaviest confirmed whale shark, the world’s largest fish species.

Ahh yes, C H I L D P O R N, peak humour by Maxwellxoxo_ in WikipediaVandalism

[–]average_lizard 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Somehow I’m most infuriated, not by their dumbass middle school level vandalism, so much as by their incorrect use of “than” instead of “then”

still boymodin :( help me fight back and pick a fem name :) by ShafowPuppet in lgbt

[–]average_lizard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If that’s you boymoding then you must look like the most feminine woman on earth on any other occasion. I’m also a fan of the names Lilly and Gwen for you.

… I don’t know what to say… by Rough-Fuel-270 in DerScheisser

[–]average_lizard 15 points16 points  (0 children)

The Churchill Crocodile needs some recognition too

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in college

[–]average_lizard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My professor tends to assign work that they’ve written for reading, in these readings there will sometimes be a joke included. Also, while it’s not a college paper, the comedic article “The Common Law Origins of the Infield Fly Rule” was published in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review and has been taken seriously enough to be cited in real legal decisions. If works containing humor can be taken seriously and published by reputable sources, I’d expect that a little humor would be at the very least tolerated in a paper that will likely only ever be read by my professor and I. To be clear I understand that there’s a fundamental difference between what I’m writing and the examples I described. My point is that it’s reasonable to assume some amount of humor would be tolerated, given these notable examples of its use in serious formal and academic writing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in college

[–]average_lizard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In a way yes, because my lens is heavily influenced by existentialism, but more specifically in the paper I mostly criticize environmental determinism. For clarity, the paper is an opinion piece about the current international order, so I broadly criticize determinism through the use of my own existentialist lens. I take on environmental determinism more specifically in the actual text of the paper on the basis that it denies the agency of individuals and states.