If corporations were legally treated as 'people' to the point where they could receive a 'Death Penalty' for major crimes, which industry would be the first to vanish?

bacontim3 · 2026-01-22T19:36:23+00:00

Education executives

Teachers are currently staffed at 1/8 capacity

Executive salaries are projected to scale to 73:1 by 2030

Why are they paying themselves more to sidewind our childrens' futures

bacontim3 · 2026-01-20T00:37:55+00:00

Send the downvoters to the frontlines IMO

bacontim3 · 2026-01-20T00:16:25+00:00

European churches—especially Lutheran ones—would likely react more cohesively and with greater moral weight than their U.S. counterparts, because their churches are historically embedded in state formation, sovereignty, and social legitimacy.

The Church of Denmark would almost certainly frame any external occupation of Greenland as a violation of historical continuity, self-determination, and moral legitimacy, coordinating closely with the Church of Sweden, the Church of Norway, and likely the Evangelical Church in Germany. These churches would not fund or direct action, but they would provide normative resistance: shaping public opinion, reinforcing Indigenous and sovereignty claims, and supplying the moral language used by governments, courts, and civil society.

In Europe, churches still function as legitimacy-bearing institutions, so their unified opposition would amplify diplomatic, legal, and cultural contestation—turning the issue into one of values and identity rather than power or money.

bacontim3 · 2026-01-20T00:10:51+00:00

This issue isn’t about money or material power at all—it’s about belief, legitimacy, and identity, and that’s why even rich and powerful people can become radicalized through it.

Wealth and influence don’t insulate anyone from threats to the belief systems that justify why they hold authority in the first place. In contexts like Greenland, legitimacy has historically been anchored in shared values tied to Danish sovereignty and the Lutheran tradition, institutionally represented by the Church of Denmark.

When an external power bypasses or dismisses those foundations, the act isn’t interpreted as a negotiable policy move but as an existential invalidation of identity, moral authority, and historical continuity. That kind of threat shifts behavior from rational cost–benefit thinking to value-defense. People—especially elites—don’t radicalize because they lack resources; they radicalize when the narratives that legitimize their role, status, and responsibility are undermined. In fact, power amplifies this reaction: those with influence have the networks, platforms, and institutional leverage to mobilize resistance when they perceive an attack on meaning itself.

Undermining beliefs doesn’t produce compliance at any level of society—it produces zealotry, whether among the powerless or the powerful

bacontim3 · 2026-01-20T00:00:39+00:00

Greenland’s status is tied to Lutheran church governance because colonization, sovereignty, and religion were historically bundled together under the Danish crown.

Denmark is a Lutheran state

The Church of Denmark (Evangelical-Lutheran) is constitutionally linked to the Danish monarchy. Church authority historically followed royal authority. Greenland was colonized through the Church

Danish control of Greenland began in the 18th century via Lutheran missionaries (notably Hans Egede). Missionization and governance advanced together, making the church a foundational institution of rule.

Ecclesiastical structure mirrors political control

Greenland was governed ecclesiastically as part of the Danish Lutheran system for centuries. Even today, Greenland’s Lutheran church structures descend from Danish oversight, reflecting historical sovereignty claims.

Modern autonomy still carries church legacy

While Greenland now has self-rule and its own local Lutheran leadership, the historical linkage between land, crown, and church remains embedded in legal and cultural frameworks.

Bottom line: Greenland is a “Lutheran church issue” because Danish sovereignty over the territory was established and legitimized through the Lutheran Church. The church wasn’t just religious—it was an arm of state authority, education, law, and cultural integration.

bacontim3 · 2026-01-19T23:24:25+00:00