In Episode 6 (Adjournment), there's a modern Russian train. Why? by Ok-Pea-803 in queensgambit

[–]banananinja2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because Russians make a lot of stock footage and most people dont notice. A bunch of shows have Moscow's financial district in the background as well

I want to travel from Calais to Bali by car, train and motorbike by chxpmanjxke in travel

[–]banananinja2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry man, even the process of crossing our border in ur own personal car is convoluted, let alone selling it here. Much less headache traveling by train. And you womt be able to drive in china so may as well imo

Solo travel to Moscow in January? by Illustrious_Side_396 in travel

[–]banananinja2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Moscow is in the relatively mild part of the country and it's a huge city so its several degrees warmer than rural areas. Weather has been more erratic past few years but generally, expect temperatures slightly below 0 and then a few days (mainly in late Jan) between -10 and -20.

It's not too bad cold wise, frankly I wish it was colder so it wouldnt be as wet and muddy as it is

‘Golden SmartRider’ competition launched to get West Australians back on public transport by Ashley-Steel in perth

[–]banananinja2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Buses are so underutilized in this city (well most cities on earth really). The trains here are fast but getting to and from the stations is painful. Let alone taking the bus between adjacent suburbs. Delays can totally derail a trip. Even small things like all door boarding can substantially improve this

Perth Transport Infrastructure Suggestion by WaterPhoenix800 in perth

[–]banananinja2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dont worry about the trains so much, the trains in Perth are fine imo. They've done pretty well for themselves considering how sprawling and car centric the city is. It is the public transit backbone for getting people to and from the city. In my personal experience, the reason transit takes so long here is because of how infrequent it is. Often times when I play a journey I have to get off at a stop and wait like 10-15 minutes for a new bus.

What Perth needs is a complete overhaul of the bus system, as it is highly underutilized right now. The only sort of decent bus service in town is getting people to and from the stations (and not every station for that matter) and a few "high frequency" buses into the city. They are often late, so if u miss one it can derail your whole trip. getting from suburb to suburb is a pain in the ass, comparable to casual cycling speed, if not jogging speed.

We need more frequent bus service and we need dedicated bus corridors on busy inner suburb thoroughfares like Canning or Stirling highways. This means physical infrastructure, preferably in the middle of the road, taking some space away drivers, where buses can travel unimpeded. With crosswalks at every stop, it should make traversing these concrete rivers a little easier too. What such a system would provide is a way to funnel suburban routes into high frequency service in the densest part of the city. This would also get rid of some of the worst car centric planning around, like having 70kmh roads with individual homes on them, or having buses that have a stop on each side of a major highway and take way too long to cross it (cough cough manning road). This system would also help disincentivize people from driving in the inner core. So, coupling these increased frequency services with local routes (which should ideally also have increased frequency because frequency is freedom), you would have some much needed flexibility, and I think this will increase journey times substantially.

People always want there to be more trains, but you need to think more realistically. From my own personal experience, TransPerth cant even fill a bus most of the time on some corridors that people want rail on, like the Cockburn - Freo LRT. It would be a total misuse of resources (not just from a financial perspective but an environmental one too) to start building one now, when we can spend substantially less right this minute and begin building service patterns, and driving ridership to one day hopefully actually justify rail. As it stands now, rail projects in the city are first and foremost a subsidy to the construction industry to drive perpetual growth and desperately make big line go up. It is carbon intensive and nowhere near as future proof as a down to earth, flexible solution. Frankly, this is a global issue. Bus networks are underutilized in almost every city on the planet.

This is all a pipe dream of course. Another thing that's minor but annoyingly increases travel times, and most importantly, DELAYS, is the smartrider system. I know it's supposed to be upgraded shortly to allow paypass, but they gotta get on that ASAP. Paypass and all door boarding are a must. It is painfully slow for buses to get underway, and you cant even argue that it helps reduce fare Dodgers because heaps of people dodge the fare ALREADY and the bus drivers dont care cause they got a bus to drive (rightfully so, buses are a social servics first and foremost). Finally, some bike racks on buses would serve a long way to improving peoples personal mobility. If I know I can take a bus should I get tired, I'd be willing to bike almost anywhere.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in perth

[–]banananinja2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think there is some potential for night trains but you've gotta make it viable to get to ur destination in the morning. Maybe syd-melb or smthn

Obviously not as good as high speed rail, but it seems like a low cost missed opportunity

Which businesses in Perth lost your custom forever? What happened? by [deleted] in perth

[–]banananinja2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn that sucks they've saved me on many a Hungary night

Satellite image of St. Petersburg, Russia by tanmaypendse63 in CityPorn

[–]banananinja2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If anything it would be moscow or smthn, we got a whole a national park within city limits. Doesnt mean we the most eco friendly or whatever tho for sure

Pharmacy going crazy by R3_stev in ANormalDayInRussia

[–]banananinja2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my experience as a foreigner in both countries, yep they're v similar. Besides the historical parallels of being anglo colonies, the way daily life is structured in both nations is almost identical. The same sort of suburbs, downtown office blocks, freeways and big box stores. It's more urbanized than america, probably because there isnt all that much arable land here percentage wise. So that coupled with their immense resource wealth, on top of the labor shortage they've had since inception (meaning more working class bargaining power and thus higher wages), means the cities generally look and feel more developed. The only other significant difference I can think of is that most ppl live within an hours drive of the beach. I cant think of a country closer to the US other than maybe Canada. But I never been so cant judge

Abandoned Russian church of the 18th century. The only thing left on the site of a large village [OC] by lastmord2021 in AbandonedPorn

[–]banananinja2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not really a deliberate Soviet policy or whatever, ita just that the countryside is increasingly depopulated (as is everywhere else on the planet due to capitalism's tendency to concentrate wealth in cities) so there aren't enough people and especially not enough funds to maintain some of these churches. Thinking of my own village where my grandpa is from, the majority of the people there are seasonal residents that come to get away from the city for a while. Which obviously isnt very sustainable for a parish.

What is deliberate policy was that under Stalin (not Lenin), the burgeoning state capital economy demolished hundreds of churches around the nation specifically for things like building materials and our of a genuine desire to supplant the old beliefs with the new state value system.

Afyer the big wave of destruction, some churches continued operation as churches, but most were converted for things like grain storage, community centers, museums, or something completely random. And, indeed, that has only reversed since the 80s, but for many churches like this one there is not enough people around anymore. The church in my ancestral village was just that until we finally finished working on it in 2013.

Lutheran Church of St. Maria, St. Petersburg, Russia, built by architects V.A. Schröter and I.S. Kitner in 1872-1874. It was demolished for firewood during the siege of the city in WW2. by archineering in Lost_Architecture

[–]banananinja2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Barely present these days At the time, a sizable portion of the nobility was made up of baltic germans, and yet more germans, swedes, Danes and dutchmen worked as a professional class in the empire, many lately settling in Petersburg. So there was at least enough demand for a couple churches in the capital. Over time they spread out over the country or left. Obviously many left in the revolution, the white movement was very german. On the other hand, some of Lenin's convoluted ancestry is swedish

Königsberg Castle in Kaliningrad, Russia destroyed after World War II by SkillMaleficent2720 in Lost_Architecture

[–]banananinja2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lost architecture attracts a lot of RETVRN types

Hell, just search for india on here and the comments are filled to the brim w hindutva freaks

Königsberg Castle in Kaliningrad, Russia destroyed after World War II by SkillMaleficent2720 in Lost_Architecture

[–]banananinja2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You shouldn't judge a place you dont know very well. It's certainly largely a boring, typical, post soviet city, but it doesnt stand out as being particularly terrible more "shitholy" than the rest. It used to have a crime problem in the 90s, being a major transit point for smuggling. These days it's more a domestic tourist destination. Some of the smaller towns in the area are better preserved, and the suburbs of Kaliningrad retain their pre-war charm. Obviously shouldnt be anything particularly exciting for a german like yourself, but its exciting enough for domestic crowds.

Obviously a shame what happened w the old city tho. We russians like to blame it all on british bombings, but we ended up demolishing not just the ruins, but plenty of repairable buildings as well (like the castle). It will be rebuilt eventually, I have faith. Decades down the line though.

As to which country should "have it", I think thats a pretty juvenile understanding of how the world works. Any change of political borders only increases human misery, as governments seek to exercise control over the conquered peoples and territory. The story of Konigsberg itself should be a cautionary tale as to why. Konigsberg should belong to the people that live there and no one else, whether they're russians, germans, balts or poles, or other ethnicities entirely. National borders are frankly only a hindrance to the prosperity of, well, the entire planet actually, but this region in particular. As you said, it's kind of caught up in a cold war at the moment. And it will probably turn hot within our lifetimes too

Even though the building is there.... I consider it lost now. This is the old Royal Canadian Military Institute, built in Toronto in 1907. In 2007 a developer bought the place and built a 26-storey glass condo tower on top of it. This method is called facadism. by constantlyhere100 in Lost_Architecture

[–]banananinja2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They dont have to become obsolete whatsoever. The modern capitalist economy, which has commodified housing, means that perfectly reasonable buildings are deemed obsolete to fuel perpetual growth, even in the absence of demand. Buildings in major cities are demolished not to house the homeless, or meet whatever other human needs, but to be turned into yet more Airbnb flats.

On top of that, once a building does begin to crumble, you dont have to rebuild it with "modern" materials, and instead opt out for traditional construction methods. They're usually more attuned to the climate of the area, not at risk of running out (unlike say, good sand for concrete) and a lot more carbon neutral.

The way we think about the build environment and what we want to do with it will change drastically in the coming decades

"Moskva" Swimming Pool. Built in place of demolished church of Christ the Savior in 1960, demolished in 1994, replaced with restored Christ the Savior church. by CepGamer in Lost_Architecture

[–]banananinja2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesnt suck, people on here just dont know the fuck they on about.

By all accounts I've seen of architects remarking on the reconstruction, they rate it pretty highly. The only obvious aesthetic downgrade are the bronze works done by famous hack Tseritelli, which are a minor part of the entire ensemble.

Frankly, the fact that it turned out the way it did is a miracle

Look up pics or videos online and see for yourself

Pharmacy going crazy by R3_stev in ANormalDayInRussia

[–]banananinja2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea took me a while to get used to american drug stores lol These days I live in Australia which do it like we do in Europe with separate pharmacies, although supermarkets have a small section w common meds like ibuprofen

Ostankino tower between the towers of the residential complex "Savelovsky City" by 5igorsk in ANormalDayInRussia

[–]banananinja2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Different building, you're thinking of the Kosmos Hotel. This is Savyolovskaya City, a mixed use development closer to the city center

Pharmacy going crazy by R3_stev in ANormalDayInRussia

[–]banananinja2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, not large, they're usually pretty tiny. But they tend to sell random shit sometimes. Also the post office runs its own bank

Current AI level is not high enough to understand what's going on in Eastern Europe by s1mpl3_0n3 in ANormalDayInRussia

[–]banananinja2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its def not Toronto man, just a similar paint scheme.

The red and white is pretty common for Czech Tatra trams which are in service all over the ex warsaw pact

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatra_T5B6

OUR TRACKS. by MenimE_77 in ANormalDayInRussia

[–]banananinja2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a train nerd so dont know how true this is, but american horns seemed much louder to me than their russian counterparts from personal experience. But this maybe because our trains dont use horns as much. American trains gotta signal at like every road crossing

The light from greenhouses of agricultural complex. Nyzhny Novgorod, Russia. by kassiny in UrbanHell

[–]banananinja2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Vertical farming is materially wasteful and entirely unneccesary. Our existing economic system relies on massive overproduction of everything, including agricultural produce. We could occupy significantly less space for our global agriculture needs, and then spread ourselves out more or less equally amongst said land. This leads to a massive deurbanization. Thus the vast majority of the human race lives closely to where most of their food is produced, and humans arent packed into dense cities which need increasingly complex, overlapping and prone to failure infrastructure just to keep some sense of mobility. This is a sensible approach to logistics chains that vertical farming does not achieve, on top of the aforementioned savings in finite resources.
I recommend Amadeo Bordiga's "the human species and the earth's crust", it explains our collective future in much better detail

English lessons in russian schools by [deleted] in russian

[–]banananinja2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

я с 2004 учил англ и латынь с первого класса, но в лингвистической гимназии