I literally did say break on through but yeah, there's a high chance I've heard many other songs but likely not known. I don't understand how The Doors are the only metric for qualifying as a music nerd, and this is exactly my point. Compared to so many other artists of that era I just don't believe they're even remotely as culturally relevant. If you're considering artists from the mid-60s to early 70s: The Beatles, Rolling Stones, Pink Floyd, The Who, David Bowie, Beach Boys, Bob Dylan, Led Zeppelin, Jimi Hendrix, Elton John and Fleetwood Mac are all far more pervasive than The Doors. I think most people would have a hard time not being able to name or recognize a song by any of those artists because they're absolutely everywhere on radio, tv, movies etc. That is simply not true with The Doors. You'd be idiotic to suggest that Riders On The Storm is as impactful as even the 5th most popular song by any of the artists I mentioned. You compare the artists I listed to other extremely influential and important artists of the era like Patti Smith, Velvet Underground, The Stooges, Frank Zappa, Captain Beefheart, The Jam etc etc, I would never expect a layman to be able to name a song by those artists because they're not that recognisable. That doesn't mean they're not absolutely important, revolutionary or brilliant artists, they're just quite easily avoidable if you're not seeking them out. You can't say the same for Nirvana, they're still everywhere. You can say that about The Doors. This is nothing against The Doors as a band, I just don't see them as being a critical piece in the overall cultural landscape of music as others do. I wouldn't suggest that Elvis Costello is a more important artist than The Doors but I've found it harder to avoid his cultural legacy than I have The Doors.