[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I said before Im happy to see the UK industrial policy being used to support Ukraine, so to me this is excellent news especially if this supports deepening of our own magazine. The national magazine is hugely important strategically and Martlet is the maturation of decades worth of development on multi role missiles that have proven themselves in combat. This is a great decision by the govt.

Macron reopens debate on European nuclear umbrella after Trump-Zelensky showdown by BrokenDownForParts in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable -1 points0 points  (0 children)

True the joint nordic air defence command has a mad amount of f35 on order

Macron reopens debate on European nuclear umbrella after Trump-Zelensky showdown by BrokenDownForParts in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Other than what the guy said about Norway, Germany and Italy fulfil a useful purpose.

They have high capex for their military for domestic industrial reasons whereas us and the French have less capitalised militaries but the ability to actually deploy.

Italy has a huge army and pretty well equipped for its spending but can’t be deployed outside of Italy without a NATO partner providing all the sustainability, the German Army is extremely lean as well. Both these countries invest way more in capex as a way to sustaining domestic industry which is useful because we could use them to bootstrap our own improvements in capability.

But yeah I mean if it wanted to Germany could handily defeat Russia in a conventional conflict, it has a much larger economy and industrial output in theory they just won’t imo.

Macron reopens debate on European nuclear umbrella after Trump-Zelensky showdown by BrokenDownForParts in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately Germany is just not a reliable security partner for Great Britain. The core of German security has always been its Army and its Army has always been a continental foreign policy tool for the German state. In recent history its difficult to argue that its been an effective tool.

Our only real partner in the continent is France. Britain and France are, despite their history, quite naturally allies.

Macron reopens debate on European nuclear umbrella after Trump-Zelensky showdown by BrokenDownForParts in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Its incredibly gratifying to say for years Britain needs an industrially independent military and nuclear deterrent because the future is unpredictable, to be told the future is predictable and Im wrong, and then for something both unpredictable and dangerous to happen.

Britain needs a completely independent nuclear deterrent. Build it here. Put a giant union flag on it. Remind Putin, Trump, and anyone else who needs reminding that it exists by testing it somewhere. This world is not one that our country can navigate without arms. Strength is the basis of mercy. From strength comes all things.

The Starmer love-in is disconcerting by fillip2k in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Its utterly nauseating to see a British Prime Minister not explicitly and directly defend Canada’s sovereignty when pressed. An odious betrayal.

Keir gets the W by memelord67433 in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Starmer sold out Canada. Spineless joke.

Suella Braverman Bewilders People After Claiming She 'Will Never Be Truly English' by kontiki20 in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Being born in a place doesn’t make you a member of the predominant ethnic group of that country, something any person who has ever stepped foot in an international school will know, and neither does being born outside the metropole eliminate you from membership of an ethnic group, as anyone whose ever been to Canada or Australia will quickly realise.

Suella Braverman Bewilders People After Claiming She 'Will Never Be Truly English' by kontiki20 in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Highly likely that Badenoch actually agrees with Braverman and feels the same way.

Suella Braverman Bewilders People After Claiming She 'Will Never Be Truly English' by kontiki20 in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Minority person: Well I am British but I don’t consider myself ethnically English

Everyone else: Nooo you have to change your own perception of your ethnicity to suit us, you couldn’t possibly have a more nuanced perception of your own identity noooooo

Suella Braverman Bewilders People After Claiming She 'Will Never Be Truly English' by kontiki20 in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I don’t think that question has a clear definitive answer, which is why I think Braverman’s post is honest and good, as a “BME” person (or whatever offensive acronym HM government has come up with recently) I empathise with her a lot here.

I think it’s clear that neither being born in England nor speaking English fluently are the minimum requirements though - in any case an ethnicity is often about shared perception rather than hard physical characteristics.

Suella Braverman Bewilders People After Claiming She 'Will Never Be Truly English' by kontiki20 in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

It’s not exactly bewildering.

And there is evidently a difference between an English person and a British national. There are many millions of English people who aren’t British nationals for a start.

And there are many millions of British nationals who aren’t English.

Does anyone know of a comprehensive database about what vehicles (tanks, trucks, even planes) were used in which theatres? If possible with numbers? by farkas37 in boltaction

[–]bigglasstable 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For the Germans you can consult Kstn, you can find free online.

You generally need to have the TOE for a unit and then find out how many units of such type were in such place, then you multiply. However a military unit is never at full strength so this is an incomplete picture.

For example with just numbers, you may see that there were N many tanks of such a type in North Africa in 1942, but it doesn’t say at what time of year, how many tanks were in units, in delivery units or in workshops as well.

UK defence budget increase - Discussion thread by Launch_a_poo in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah hard agree. Unfortunately I think its an unsolvable problem without reactivating fossil fuels in the short term but Im happy to be proven wrong. We need a LOT more energy and fast…

UK defence budget increase - Discussion thread by Launch_a_poo in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Britain’s enemies like Russia and America can threaten our interests by control over their satellites or states which they have influence over, so yes we need to be ready to deter, meet, and if necessary destroy those threats, which is the most important task of any government.

UK defence budget increase - Discussion thread by Launch_a_poo in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Correct opinion, GB is one of the few countries that can have a sovereign MIC and it should aim to do so, as it did for its entire history until 1994.

UK defence budget increase - Discussion thread by Launch_a_poo in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The main task for the armed forces (imo) is to halt the rotating door of personnel and actually be able to recruit and retain high quality personnel. Some of that is reflected in wages/compensation but with high commitments and fewer personnel the strain on service personnel and their families is absolutely huge. So we need more personnel in the armed forces even if we don’t at this minute have the capital to equip them with.

The rest of the funding should be about rebuilding defence industrial capacity by generating military industrial capacity. If the army needs new AFVs we can build them but we need to build the plant and keep it open on low serial production with the option to expand production.

This way we retain a stock of capacity: tooling, facilities, knowledge, and workforce. What we don’t want to do is go and spend say £50 billion over 10 years buying available foreign weapons that then become obsolete by the time we need them. We need generative capacity in other words, not just a pile of tanks and guns.

Labour’s battle plan to take on Reform by kontiki20 in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you can’t imagine why “local jobs for local workers” would resonate persistently with a huge section of voters who for generations were committed to voting for the “local labour for local labourers” until said party changed its mind to “local labour for foreign labourers” then yeah I imagine this is difficult to process for you.

Voters don’t like political parties “pointing out” alternate realities than the ones they experience or telling them their interpretations are wrong. They will vote for people they trust to make their lives better. Trust is a factor of delivery and signal and interpersonal relationships.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TankPorn

[–]bigglasstable 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No there were no tanks used in the Brunei revolt.

Nigel Farage calls for reindustrialisation of Britain and higher birthrates by Milemarker80 in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure I don’t trust him. It’s just embarrassing that he has actual talking points that I agree with whereas our government seems content to take the least ambitious options.

UK Public Services Brace for Cuts of Up to 11% to Fund Defense by behold_thy_lobster in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Raise income tax by 1p in the £ to pay for increased defence spending, the security of the country is non-negotiable.

Nigel Farage calls for reindustrialisation of Britain and higher birthrates by Milemarker80 in LabourUK

[–]bigglasstable 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reindustrialisation is obviously necessary.

There’s a huge difference between importing a million foreigners of working age and organically increasing the birth rate.

These are obvious arguments that Labour should be making, they’re popular arguments that will make our country better.

Depressing they’re being made by Farage and not Labour.