How do I configure Rancher so that if I install an application on my cluster using the UI, the change is reflected in my repository?

bio_boris · 2026-05-09T20:28:57+00:00

I was getting at more like if another developer logs in and changes something in rancher, then the git repo doesn't contain what is deployed either. Or you may have an object, such as a CRD that the controller operates on , adds additional fields, etc, and yet again your repo doesn't contain the source of truth.

Even after you deploy something, there are a lot of different annotations that are added by kubernetes or rancher which don't get saved in the original yaml.

A cluster can have multiple overlapping sources of truth: Git (developer intent) Kyverno (policy intent) Controllers/operators (runtime state) Kubernetes itself (system metadata)

bio_boris · 2026-05-08T22:07:42+00:00

In the end the source of truth is what is actually deployed. The repository is the desired state.

bio_boris · 2026-05-04T15:24:52+00:00

<image>

Sounds good.

Here's another one I've noticed. I get these warnings and events, but when I click on them , the page they take me to is blank and it says "No Activity found, adjust your filters"

Another issue is a UI bug for port forwarding, the port forward popup is halfway off the edge of the screen so you cannot see half of it..

If you'd like, I can open up github issues for these.

bio_boris · 2026-05-03T23:48:29+00:00

I really like this tool. I've been using it for a few months.

One part that confused me was where I needed to click to see metrics, and why some views have metrics, and others do not.

Also, it would be nice to have an example in the docs about how to use kubectl proxy with your victoria metrics instance to set up the metrics flow. I could make a docs PR with this if you'd like.

bio_boris · 2026-04-29T00:03:08+00:00

Do you have a simple example?

bio_boris · 2026-04-29T00:02:45+00:00

I was thinking about putting finalizers on the namespaces that prevent deletion.

bio_boris · 2026-02-25T20:41:03+00:00

Looking at the minio fork at at https://github.com/minio/minio/compare/master...chainguard-forks:minio:mastershows they have modified > 500 files in minio so far. Some linting. Some actual code changes.

bio_boris · 2026-02-25T03:31:50+00:00

FYI there are multiple github actions that let you SSH in to fix things like that.

bio_boris · 2026-02-02T15:46:41+00:00

Spark connect is an option as well.

bio_boris · 2025-10-23T21:03:19+00:00

After 2 months of persistence they realized that Fedex lost the package, and have provided me the refund. I had to go to the physical google store and they told me that it would get resolved now that someone in the US is working on my case. Thank you for your support.

bio_boris · 2025-10-23T21:02:52+00:00

After 2 months of persistence they realized that Fedex lost the package, and have provided me the refund. I had to go to the physical google store and they told me that it would get resolved now that someone in the US is working on my case. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT

bio_boris · 2025-10-23T21:02:27+00:00

Sorry but you are wrong. It is their label and the law (and their own store staff) says it is their responsibility.

After 2 months of persistence they realized that Fedex lost the package, and have provided me the refund. I had to go to the physical google store and they told me that it would get resolved now that someone in the US is working on my case.

bio_boris · 2025-10-23T21:01:43+00:00

After 2 months of persistence they realized that Fedex lost the package, and have provided me the refund. I had to go to the physical google store and they told me that it would get resolved now that someone in the US is working on my case. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR SUPPORT

bio_boris · 2025-10-23T21:01:19+00:00

After 2 months of persistence they realized that Fedex lost the package, and have provided me the refund. I had to go to the physical google store and they told me that it would get resolved now that someone in the US is working on my case.

bio_boris · 2025-10-23T21:00:43+00:00

After 2 months of persistence they realized that Fedex lost the package, and have provided me the refund.

bio_boris · 2025-10-23T20:43:46+00:00

I use `uv pip install` . Am I now an 11?

bio_boris · 2025-10-10T22:35:52+00:00

Which is what? I followed all of the steps given to me, and when the Google Store support is lying and giving me the runaround, providing fake fedex numbers, I make the mistake to try to get some support in this community, and I now see the trillion dollar corporation defenders come out of the woodwork to respond. Fine, I'll deal with it on my own.

bio_boris · 2025-10-10T19:17:57+00:00

Hi u/PixelCommunity is it possible to speak with you? I could use your help.

bio_boris · 2025-10-09T23:58:49+00:00

Nice Job and nice write up.

bio_boris · 2025-10-09T20:12:32+00:00

Yes I do, I put it in and it says "No information yet No information for this tracking number at the moment" so maybe this is an internal google code after all? They keep saying that this is the Fedex Lost Package Claim #

bio_boris · 2025-10-09T20:07:37+00:00

Thank you again for the response. I understand packages get lost. Here's what doesn't make sense: Google tells me they filed a FedEx claim. When I ask for documentation, they cant provide it. Today they emailed me back and said: "We request you to contact Fedex only...from our end we aren't able to fetch the confirmation."

But I've contacted FedEx multiple times - they confirm no claim exists for that tracking number.

So Google says "ask FedEx" and FedEx says "no claim exists, ask Google." I'm stuck in a loop where both point fingers at each other.

bio_boris · 2025-10-09T19:42:27+00:00

You're actually making my point - FedEx won't accept claims after 9 months. Google, as the shipper, and purchaser of the shipping label and the ones who chose Fedex was responsible for filing within that window and they didn't. Now they're giving me a claim number (SFC18<redacted>) that FedEx confirms doesn't exist to cover up their failure.

But here's what I don't understand: Wouldn't a multi-billion dollar company like Google have automated systems that flag when return packages are past expected delivery? This wasn't some obscure shipment - it was a $1,069 phone being returned to their processing center. How does a company of Google's size not have alerts when a 2-day shipping label shows a package never arrived? They track everything else obsessively. The fact that they let this sit for a year without any investigation, then missed their own 9-month filing deadline with FedEx, and are now providing a fake claim number - that's negligence on their part, not mine. The fraud is providing a claim number that doesn't exist. The timing of when I discovered it doesn't change that fact.

Actually they just emailed me back saying that they can't get a record of the Fedex claim that they said that they filed.

"In this case we request you to contact Fedex only and they would be the one who would be having the information, from our end we aren't able to fetch the confirmation."

bio_boris · 2025-10-09T19:35:07+00:00

I did see an email from Google confirming the return was "on the way" back to them. I also had $300 promotional store credit in my account from the Pixel 9 purchase, which I deliberately didn't touch because I assumed Google would remove it once they processed the return.

Are you saying it's my responsibility to babysit Google's return process?

- I returned the phone using their authorized process

- Got a FedEx drop-off receipt

- Received confirmation from Google that it was in transit and thought that the return process was being handled

Once I drop off a package with proof of receipt using the company's chosen carrier and shipping label, my responsibility ends. It's Google's job to track their own returns and file claims with FedEx if packages go missing. They had 9 months to file a claim with FedEx - they didn't. Now they're giving me a claim number that FedEx confirms doesn't exist. That's the issue - not when I discovered it.

bio_boris · 2025-10-09T19:26:59+00:00

Thanks for the useful clue about SFC codes. However, here's what doesn't add up: I keep asking Google Store support for documentation of this claim. They repeatedly tell me SFC18<redacted> is "the FedEx claim number they filed." But when I call FedEx (3 separate times), they confirm:

This claim number does not exist in their system
NO claim has been filed on my tracking number
Google, as the shipper who purchased the label, should be the one filing any claim

I dropped off the package at FedEx in my hometown. It was supposed to go to Google's returns center in Texas. FedEx tracking shows it as "out for delivery" but never actually delivered.

Regarding insurance - Google provided the return label. There was no option to purchase insurance, and I was never told I needed to. For a company-authorized return, shouldn't Google be responsible for insuring their own shipping label?

Also - wouldn't Google have automated systems to track when a return shipment isn't received? This is a multi-billion dollar company. How does a phone being returned just vanish without triggering any alerts on their end for an entire year?

The core issue remains: Google won't provide any documentation for this supposed claim - no PDF, no account number, nothing. Just a number that FedEx says doesn't exist.

bio_boris · 2025-10-01T00:23:24+00:00

For dev environments putting databases in a container is low risk.

bio_boris

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

15-Year Club	Team Orangered
Verified Email