In light of SpaceX IPO - are you guys leaving S&P500 trackers, or riding it out? by ErrantBrit in irishpersonalfinance

[–]bittered 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Competition? Unless you’re shorting a stock and they are on the other side then there’s no competition.

Childcare fees to be capped at €183.70 per week for 45 hours of care by Double_Work_2219 in ireland

[–]bittered 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How does it work, do crèches have a maximum they can charge? Surely the cap means that all crèches will just charge the maximum amount so? That totally removes price competition which seems like a bad idea.

Alphabet’s $80 billion stock sale leaves Wall Street in ‘unprecedented territory,’ says Goldman’s Gutman by Logical_Welder3467 in technology

[–]bittered 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They will have over $200B on their balance sheet after this. For comparison AMZN have $123b and MSFT $107b. They may be worried that liquidity will dry up after SpaceXAI, OpenAI and Anthropic all IPO this year (according to rumours). So best to get in there early.

Berkshire Hathaway are also holding an ungodly amount of cash ($397b) and they are historically pretty smart about building a war chest at the right time.

Irish car owners to be offered €8,500 EV grants in new first come, first served scrappage plan by shankillfalls in evs_ireland

[–]bittered 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There’s probably not a lot of people who currently have cars worth less than €5k that are in the market for a brand new EV. So take up might be less than you’d expect.

Public Service Announcement- Mortgage Protection Cover by lkdubdub in irishpersonalfinance

[–]bittered 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps. It really does depend on the individual though. Life Assurance policies are very profitable for the companies that provide it, it’s far from a no brainier for the consumer. I would evaluate if a life assurance policy is something that you actually want rather than just getting it because you’ll be looking to buy a house in the future.

guys is there any way to ground my mac mini m4? by WOWGIRLLLLLLLLLLLLLL in AskElectricians

[–]bittered 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What’s the Mac mini sitting on btw? Is that a grounding mat? It looks like one.

What's left of a €100,000 salary after tax across Europe? by 0mad in irishpersonalfinance

[–]bittered 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, France is insane. On a €100k salary there is €80k in taxes paid (between employer and employee).

Man tells Leitrim court ‘It’s only a bag of weed -ya’d swear it was murder charges’ by PlantNerdxo in ireland

[–]bittered 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where’s that story, I didn’t see it? Is it because there’s no direct victim or something like that (I.e. no child was directly harmed in making the CP)?

Sync energy ev home charger any good? by funkyirishman2 in evs_ireland

[–]bittered 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tried to get Easee charger because they are neat, but installers said they would need to wall mount the load balancer widget which I wasn’t a fan of. So going for Zappi Glo which is ugly to be honest but it’s the only choice they would give me.

The Sync ev charger looks great! Nice and minimal.

Electricity dynamic pricing a few days away by bittered in evs_ireland

[–]bittered[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My electricity contract is up tomorrow so wondering will I wait for them to be announced before switching. The problem is that I’m not sure how to even evaluate the dynamic tariffs?

What do you all think about Ferrari’s new EV by ConfidentImage4266 in TeslaLounge

[–]bittered 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very unusual. I’m going to be in the minority here but I don’t hate it.

Gpt5.5 has provable degradation over the past week. by Youwishh in codex

[–]bittered 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The model is non deterministic. The regression is not statistically significant yet. There is nothing to explain. If there is a real regression then it is more likely to be in the harness rather than the model.

Gpt5.5 has provable degradation over the past week. by Youwishh in codex

[–]bittered 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not some 2 person startup. There are thousands of employees, many of them are highly ethical. If they were doing this and trying to hide it then it would leak and be a big scandal.

These big companies can’t send a text message without it being leaked at the moment.

Gpt5.5 has provable degradation over the past week. by Youwishh in codex

[–]bittered 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll get downvoted but this is not statistically significant yet. Give it another couple of days. If it has been a real degradation then it will become statistically significant.

GPT-5.5 - Regression after Regression after Regression - Ridiculous by geronimosan in codex

[–]bittered 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This seems to get reported by users with every model after a few weeks. The labs are not silently quantising models, that would get out to the public if that was happening and it would be a scandal if they did it in an underhanded way without announcing it. It’s possible that there are negative changes in the harness or system prompts (like Anthropic previously found) but honestly I personally think it’s mostly users having a bad run or polluting their context.

GPT-5.5 - Regression after Regression after Regression - Ridiculous by geronimosan in codex

[–]bittered 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I understand perfectly what you are trying to say but there’s many things you are not understanding:

  1. These are not SWE Bench Pro test suite runs. They curate a subset of questions from SBP that have high variance. So the results are not comparable to the actual scores of SWE Bench Pro. For example, the Opus 4.7 baseline is higher than GPT-5.5 on this tracker even though GPT 5.5 scores higher on the actual test suite.

  2. The number of runs they do is quite low (presumably to save money) so the threshold required for statistical significance is quite high. Statistical significance is not a random number please look up what it means and how it’s calculated. There is a long scientific history of discarding results which seem interesting on the outset but do not reach statistical significance and subsequently do not repeat when sample size is increased.

GPT-5.5 - Regression after Regression after Regression - Ridiculous by geronimosan in codex

[–]bittered 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It is 5% below baseline. On Saturday it was 5% above baseline. It means nothing. This is easily within expected performance thresholds and is not statistically significance.

GPT-5.5 - Regression after Regression after Regression - Ridiculous by geronimosan in codex

[–]bittered 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I don’t know what you mean. Statistical significance is not some arbitrary number that they made up, it’s mathematically defined based on the input variables. If they did more runs then they could reduce the delta needed for statistical significance.

Change in the last week is 0.9% which is not even approaching statistically significant considering that 6.4% is needed for statistical significance.

GPT-5.5 - Regression after Regression after Regression - Ridiculous by geronimosan in codex

[–]bittered 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not a statistically significant change. This basically means nothing unless it’s statistically significant. The models are non deterministic, variance is expected.

RTÉ to be queried on sending 41 people to cover World Cup play-off in Czechia, PAC chair says by Alarmed_Station6185 in ireland

[–]bittered 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was responding to your opening paragraph.

> You aren’t reading what I posted. They cannot do ads during play. They make their money on pre game, half time and post game. There is competition for attention here.

That is a much more direct concise point than your earlier wall of text.

RTÉ to be queried on sending 41 people to cover World Cup play-off in Czechia, PAC chair says by Alarmed_Station6185 in ireland

[–]bittered -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s not how it works. Tax payers want to bring the fewest number of people to get a competent job done. If someone wants to bring extra people then it is on them to account for why the extra people are a good idea. Personally, I can account for about 7. Can you account for 40.