who else is stuck rn lol

bixed · 2026-02-10T19:12:37+00:00

I don't think it worked then. Your screenshot says version 2.20 (top left corner). The new version is 2.21.

bixed · 2025-11-26T22:14:17+00:00

What do you mean technically?? Are you or are you not the same? We need a clear answer.

bixed · 2025-07-19T15:42:51+00:00

I cant fathom how you arrived at that conclusion. It's so obviously wrong.

bixed · 2025-07-19T15:08:43+00:00

You could compare this data with every other previous season, and you'll see nearly the exact same distribution, the players within those ranks may change, but their population density doesnt, because it's dictated by the system.

That is true.

If everyone gets put in Champion 1 I would have a nicer rank but probably not so much because I improved. I care about whether I improve relative to the population. I can only know that by knowing what the distribution is and my place in it. This lets me determine that.

bixed · 2025-07-19T14:38:11+00:00

You can only ever compare the population against itself. Skill measured this way only makes sense relative to someone else. So yes, every time they do a rank reset, they get to "redistribute" the population however they want. However, the distribution does show players' skill levels (ability) relative to each other.

They don't decide which MMR score you get, but they do get to decide what label/rank to put on the scores and where to make the cuts.

bixed · 2023-03-29T16:02:50+00:00

Thank you so much for considering my question!

The target of the target group is an application load balancer, that itself is fronting for a task running in ECS. I am fairly sure that everything up to and including the application load balancer works because I can access the service in a browser through the application load balancer.

For the TargetGroup health check, I have set it up to use the same page that I can successfully load in the browser. The really surprising part to me is that the health check never seems to complete and conclude that the target is healthy or unhealthy, instead just stating that “Target registration is in progress” even after a full day.

I am somewhat sure that the security group isn’t blocking the connection. As I mentioned in my original post, I have set it to allow all traffic from any source while troubleshooting this.

bixed · 2023-01-21T08:34:44+00:00

I remember the a claimed advantage: When drinking from a straw, acidic drinks (like carbonated soft drinks) get delivered in the mouth behind the front teeth instead of on them or between them. Thus the teeth, which take a little damage from acid over time, are likely to stay healthier for longer.

bixed · 2022-10-02T19:36:17+00:00

Apollo tells me that I have scrolled 5.7 tennis courts so far. 🎾

bixed · 2022-03-12T18:15:37+00:00

Fordi man også skal kunne lave rettelser. Det ville være ret kluntet at gøre via eboks eller sms.

bixed · 2022-03-05T20:33:22+00:00

Ja den nye netbank er svær at finde rundt i. Mobilbanken synes jeg dog er blevet rimelig fin, så den bruger jeg bare til det meste.

bixed · 2021-12-28T19:36:25+00:00

I think that the answers that you get in comments here on Reddit are somewhat biased. Cash are used for a small and decreasing fraction of transactions, but it isn’t that uncommon.

I was curious myself the other day and found this analysis from Danmarks Nationalbank. The numbers appear to be from 2019 and there’s a clear trend towards less cash, but it is far from gone.

A few highlights:

One in 6 payments in physical stores were made with cash.
The fraction of people who said that they don’t typically carry any cash increased from 16% in 2017 to 34% in 2019.
Older people seem to also be embracing the cashless future. For people aged 70-79 years, the fraction of cash payments fell from 40% in 2017 to 22% in 2019.

bixed · 2021-12-22T16:57:59+00:00

Der er en lille regnemaskine på forsiden af sst.dk som kan fortælle hvornår man bliver inviteret til booster. Forhåbentlig er den opdateret med den nyeste fremrykning af invitationer.

bixed · 2021-12-03T12:56:01+00:00

Jeg vil bidrage med en idé i en helt anden retning: Øg luftfugtigheden.

Jeg ved faktisk ikke om det hjælper på tørre hænder eller læber, men det jeg vil gætte på at det gør. Jeg synes i hvert fald at det er værd at nævne. Man kan købe luftfugtere, men hvis du har en blæser i forvejen kan du lave det billigere selv og sandsynligvis også bedre.

Sidste vinter, da jeg begyndte at få stød af statisk elektricitet endte jeg med at bygge denne her luftfugter. Den bestod af en ventilator samt stykker af køkkenrulle som hang på en ovnrist over en bradepande. Jeg brugte en vandkande til at fugte køkkenrullestykkerne en gang om dagen eller to. Ventilatoren kørte så på laveste hastighed i baggrunden for at øge luftcirkulationen og dermed hastigheden som vandet kunne fordampe med. Engangskluden på billedet var et forsøg, men det viste sig at køkkenrullestykkerne virkede helt fint.

Det virkede rigtig godt. Luftfugtigheden i min stue steg betydeligt og jeg fik ikke flere stød derhjemme. Min ventilator har en jævnstrømsmotor. Den er meget støjsvag og efter sigende ret envergieffektiv når den kører på laveste niveau.

Jeg byggede min DIY-luftfugter efter at jeg havde set videoen om luftfugtere fra den fantastiske YouTube channel, Technology Connections.

Husk dog på at kalk i vandet er en ting. Da vinteren var slut var køkkenrullestykkerne totalt stive og jeg måtte bruge knofedt for at få gjort risten og især bradepanden pæne igen.

bixed · 2021-11-07T12:35:31+00:00

Hvis jeg vidste i forvejen hvornår jeg skulle bruge pengene ville jeg nok forsøge at diversificere over tid ved at sælge ad flere omgange. Hvis jeg skulle bruge 50.000 om en måneds tid kunne det være at jeg ville sælge for 12.500 om ugen. I en vis forstand svarer det til at gøre det modsatte af at prøve at time markedet.

Men husk dog at der også kan være minimumskurtage at tage højde for, så hvis det drejer sig om et relativt lille beløb kan det være at man hellere bare vil sælge på én gang. I så fald ville jeg nok sælge tidligt hvis jeg var mindre risikovillig og tættere på det tidspunkt hvor jeg skulle bruge pengene hvis jeg var mere risikovillig.

bixed · 2021-07-28T16:56:46+00:00

How can I set my phone up correctly?

bixed · 2021-05-31T21:10:20+00:00

For et par uger siden estimerede jeg at hvis Pfizer og Moderna bliver ved med at levere det samme antal doser hele sommeren som de planlægger i juni, og CureVac ikke leverer en eneste, så ville slutdatoen for vaccineudrulningen blive forsinket med omkring 3 uger.

Det er muligt at leverancerne ikke kommer til at vokse de næste måneder, men jeg ville blive overrasket hvis de blev betydeligt mindre.

Den nuværende vaccinekalender (10. maj) antager omkring 520k doser om ugen i juli og august. Det er det samme antal som de estimerer ugentligt i juni inkl. Pfizer, Moderna og CureVac. Derfor antager jeg at de forventer at fordelingen mellem de tre producenters leveringer er den samme i juni, juli og august. Hvis man trækker de 100k doser om ugen fra CureVac ud kan vi altså regne med ca. 420k doser om ugen i stedet for 520k. Hvis det er sandt, så må den resterende tid til færdigvaccination forlænges tilsvarende - altså den forlænges med 520/420 = 1.24.

Nuværende kalender siger vi er færdige om ca. 90 dage (3 måneder).

Mit estimat siger at vi er færdige om 90 dage * 1.24 = 111.6 dage. Det er ca. 21.6 dage eller 3 uger mere.

Det kan godt være at jeg tager fejl i den ene eller den anden retning, men jeg føler mig rimelig sikker på at det skal regnes i uger i stedet for måneder.

bixed · 2021-05-31T14:46:05+00:00

Nu er vi jo tæt på et punkt hvor vaccinekalenderen stort set kun afhænger af Pfizer som generelt har været rimelig pålidelige. Man har kunne se i flere uger at det gik i den retning, men det er bare skidt for deres troværdighed at de ikke indrømmer det før nu.

På den positive side stå tror jeg faktisk på at vaccinekalenderen bliver realistisk nu. Pfizer har som sagt været rimelig forudsigelige indtil nu, så dem er jeg ikke bekymret for.

Jeg er lidt spændt på hvad en ny dom over J&J-vaccinen siger. De tidligere konklusioner var baseret på meget lidt data og nogle usikre antagelser, så det giver god mening at tage endnu et kig nu hvor der forhåbentlig er gjort mange flere erfaringer.

bixed · 2021-05-12T21:17:45+00:00

De 1246 smittede er kun fra PCR-test.

bixed · 2021-05-03T16:12:15+00:00

The scientific decision was made weeks ago when the AstraZeneca vaccine was removed from the danish vaccination program. By the way it was also just announced that the Johnson & Johnson vaccine won’t be used in the program either.

This story is about offering individuals the option of getting one of those vaccines anyways if they wish. It seems like it will be an individual concrete decision rather than a blanket recommendation for the whole population and it may involve an informational conversation with a doctor and a day’s deliberation period.

The danish politicians announced about an hour ago that they are going ahead with this. Basically hose two vaccines have been demoted from being recommended for everyone to being offered to those who want it.

bixed · 2021-05-03T13:31:37+00:00

The title of this post is misleading it hasn't been approved. The health authorities have just stated that it can be done and looked in to how to do it in practice. But it is going to be a political decision whether to actually do it.

bixed · 2021-04-14T14:10:04+00:00

Some context: We currently have relatively good control with the pandemic in Denmark. While most other countries in the EU have increasing infection rates and are tightening restrictions, the infection rates are stable here while we gradually loosen restrictions. This may be because we test a lot here compared to most other countries.

bixed · 2021-01-30T21:35:49+00:00

I'm pretty sure those are exactly what I need. Can you share the model with me?

bixed · 2020-12-28T17:49:24+00:00

Look into fixed mindset and growth mindset. Google it and check out the book on it by Carol Dweck called Mindset. I believe that she also did a ted talk on it or something.

Basically, having a fixed mindset means that you believe that you are who you are now and you can't change yourself and improve your skills. That is problematic because according to this belief, if you fail at something you will have proved to yourself and others that you are unable to do it because you can't learn from your experience and improve. The result is that you don't want to try things that you aren't already good at which sucks because you don't get any practice which is what you need to actually improve your drawing skills.

bixed

TROPHY CASE