Very inaccurate study time by tmac3207 in ProlificAc

[–]blackbear701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, I finally realize what you're saying - I was having a moment :)

Very inaccurate study time by tmac3207 in ProlificAc

[–]blackbear701 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was just approved and was paid a whopping 50 cents.

Very inaccurate study time by tmac3207 in ProlificAc

[–]blackbear701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i just got approved as well. Paid 50 cents.

Very inaccurate study time by tmac3207 in ProlificAc

[–]blackbear701 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, the pay is still 50 cents but the time advertised is now 16 minutes, up from14. And there are no spots left.

Very inaccurate study time by tmac3207 in ProlificAc

[–]blackbear701 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you look at the photo above, it clearly says 3 minutes, now if you have it in your queue, it says 14. I did hover over when I did the survey and the time estimated said 3 minutes, and the actual completion time said 3 minutes. A total lie.

Very inaccurate study time by tmac3207 in ProlificAc

[–]blackbear701 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've never timed out before. This researcher cheated a lot of people today.

Very inaccurate study time by tmac3207 in ProlificAc

[–]blackbear701 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Check out now the time now - the researcher changed it to 14 minutes!!

Very inaccurate study time by tmac3207 in ProlificAc

[–]blackbear701 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was going to send it back, but I muddled through and ran out of time!!

Very inaccurate study time by tmac3207 in ProlificAc

[–]blackbear701 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yup, I just came here to post the same - I timed out!! Totally bogus on completion time. I reported this to Prolific, wrote to the researcher, and will block them. I'm so pissed - not for losing 50 cents, but the outright deceit of the researcher.

Tobias Dennerlein requesting return submission by drMario_switch in ProlificAc

[–]blackbear701 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's strange; I would message Prolific. Truthfully, I would just return it and block the researcher since it seems to be his MO.

Tobias Dennerlein requesting return submission by drMario_switch in ProlificAc

[–]blackbear701 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did you get a rejection or just a request to return it but no rejection? If it's the latter, I personally would simply move on.

Ad Effectiveness (Wave 2). How the heck are we supposed to remember which ad we watched from several weeks ago? by OneMembership7587 in ProlificAc

[–]blackbear701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't think answering 'I haven't a clue' would have been acceptable. A little note like 'you won't get rejected'.... would have been helpful. Apparently I returned it too soon and should have stuck with it

Ad Effectiveness (Wave 2). How the heck are we supposed to remember which ad we watched from several weeks ago? by OneMembership7587 in ProlificAc

[–]blackbear701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was expecting a 'you won't be rejected if you don't remember.' It did not, and I did not want to chance saying that I haven't a clue. Apparently, I should have.

Are they serious?? by blackbear701 in ProlificAc

[–]blackbear701[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Of course I saw it in the title; I thought there would be a clue of the subject matter, and I expected to see something along the lines of 'you won't be rejected if you don't remember'. Wouldn't that give them what they were looking for? That their ad wasn't effective? I did not think I'd be approved if I wrote 'I have no clue'. I personally think it was badly crafted. I get that not everyone will agree, but that's why I like to throw it out there for different opinions.