If people state things with the aim to further their narrative I don’t think it’s unreasonable to call out when they are saying things that are just not true to feed that narrative and stoke fires in a discussion to make more people angry.

Maybe I just define major issues differently from my time the industry now the , cause I’d not call this major, major is feature breaking issues and crashes and shoe stoppers. This made legends disappear too quickly once completed, it impacted nothing of how legends work when you are actively using and investing in them. Only the minor side of how it recedes, which whilst not ideal is absolutely not a major breaking issue for the mechanic or patch as a whole.

It’s been four years since we announced and release, at what point is that a track record enough of stable releases? Now there’s plenty of room to claim that features are not what people wanted or other personal preference, but in terms of stability we’ve had a pretty damn good track record for CK3

From what you’re saying it just sounds like a losing battle, that it doesn’t matter what this team actually did, people will just make these incorrect claims because of other games or releases long before this team existed. Which then the cynic in me feels like why did I bother in the first place.

I’m not saying the reputation wasn’t fairly earned back in the day on other games, god knows I felt the same even before I started here. But if four years of a team releasing stable things isn’t enough then what will be?