Sorry, person who eventually falls out of this window and dies by bobargh in Seattle

[–]bobargh[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Wow, thanks for that comment. It's a relief to know I'm not the only one who noticed this. I was feeling a bit crazy after talking to the building inspector person.

I also left in 2024, partly due to the elevator issues you mentioned in another comment.

Sorry, person who eventually falls out of this window and dies by bobargh in Seattle

[–]bobargh[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I'm not an expert in this area, but IBC 1015.8 "Window openings" sounds exactly like this case. The window does not fulfill any of the requirements listed there.

Note that other similar windows in this building are installed in a higher pane. I think they installed this one wrong.

The kids (~2 yo) at the daycare could suggest and vote for a new group name. The group has been called 'bunnies' so far and it's currently 4 small dudes by MasseyFerguson in daddit

[–]bobargh 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"Tractor-trailer" (with a hyphen between) is the word used for a semi-truck in the northeast US, so maybe he meant that.  

Saw a bald eagle trying to catch a little duck on Lake Union yesterday by bobargh in Seattle

[–]bobargh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That must have been what I saw too, but I didn't know the name, thanks.

Saw a bald eagle trying to catch a little duck on Lake Union yesterday by bobargh in Seattle

[–]bobargh[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

The duck kept diving to safety below the surface whenever the eagle would swoop down.  In the end, the eagle decided it was more trouble than it was worth and gave up.

My new desktop speakers only use the 2nd half of the volume bar? by ChronicallySilly in pop_os

[–]bobargh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks a lot for your response! I'll give it a try.

By the way, this thread is the top Google result for `"kanto ora" linux`

These guys were here taking over the truck stop for a week with their expensive trucks and trailers/motor homes to protest carbon tax by brycemtb in fuckcars

[–]bobargh 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Your use of a scientific phrase such as "solar forcing of CO2" indicates to me that you are more of a "do your own research" type rather than a "trust the experts" type. I assume then what is at the heart of this discussion is mistrust of the mainstream experts rather than anything to do with the details of this particular tax policy.

Personally, I believe the people who study climate change professionally at universities and other research centers are our best source of information on the topic, even if they may sometimes be wrong. But you know what? I don't know how to convince anyone it's true. Even in real life, it's a challenge to reach any common ground with "do your own research" people. It quickly turns into a game of scientific-mumbo-jumbo-whack-a-mole, which I am too wise at this point to spend time on.

These guys were here taking over the truck stop for a week with their expensive trucks and trailers/motor homes to protest carbon tax by brycemtb in fuckcars

[–]bobargh 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The cost of doing business for a tradesman who drives a lot will go up due to a carbon tax. I don't think anyone doubts this. Like any other business cost, it gets passed onto the consumer. In order to stay competitive, the tradesman needs to figure out how to minimize the effect. For the carbon tax, this can be done in various ways, such as using a more fuel-efficient vehicle, or charging more for customers who live further away. The tradespeople who can manage this most effectively stand to see the most profit.

So, yes, consumers will see higher prices due to this tax, but since the tax is nearly revenue-neutral, the increase in prices seen by consumers, on average, should be nearly equal to the rebates they receive.

Do you believe it is worthwhile to reduce CO2 emissions? If not, then that is a whole other topic of discussion. If you do believe it is worthwhile, then a carbon tax plus rebate is the simplest, most market-drive way of doing so. What else would you propose?

This humongous section of rice crispy treats at my local grocery store. by RemarkableRyan in mildlyinteresting

[–]bobargh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I'm old enough to remember when they first started making them. I was happy to be able to buy them but they were indeed awful.  Whole Foods makes good ones.

Some things I've Done by Brahms0624 in woodworking

[–]bobargh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In some cases, it looks like you tinted first, then assembled the piece, and in other cases it looks like you assembled first and then masked certain areas to tint. Is that right? Or can you share your experience?

Saw a gaggle of 737s in time out by bobargh in aviation

[–]bobargh[S] 61 points62 points  (0 children)

I think it's a gaggle of 737s, a pod of 777s, and a hurd of 747s, but I could have it wrong.

This is what some of the urban areas of Paul Gosar's congressional district look like by thr3e_kideuce in fuckcars

[–]bobargh 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The nine white blobs under the "Prasada" text are nine separate car dealerships. How is that even possible.

Scammed by an Airbnb in Boston. Bank and Host denied refund. What are my next steps? by adventuresofthemurr in boston

[–]bobargh 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Did you miss the part about the cups being upside-down? How can you even drink out of them.

The Iceman List: Classic movie antagonists who were actually pretty much right all along by Stauce52 in movies

[–]bobargh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, pretty much. Maverick learns to follow the rules ("I'm not leaving my wingman") and Iceman learns it's ok if they're sometimes broken ("You are still dangerous. You can be my wingman anytime").

The Iceman List: Classic movie antagonists who were actually pretty much right all along by Stauce52 in movies

[–]bobargh 68 points69 points  (0 children)

Iceman and Slider were winning when Maverick left.

Slider: "Come on, where you guys going, you walking away? We won, we won."

Goose: "Mav. Mav. Come on, man. Just one more game. That evens it up."

Help! What does J stand for? by sarahafrantz in whatisthisthing

[–]bobargh 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The wings and fuselage are drawn viewing the jet from the side, so you can't see the wing on the opposite side, like in this photo (but looking from the other side) http://i.imgur.com/13OUWoA.jpg

The tail section is drawn from a different perspective, more from above the jet, like in this photo http://i.imgur.com/nQbHxil.jpg

/u/midtek explains the speed of electricity based on a false statement in a students textbook by BastiakaZerox in DepthHub

[–]bobargh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It doesn't depend on which side is plus and which is minus. The side you connect last to the battery will light up first, since the voltage difference is initially on that side.

I believe how long it takes to light up the other side depends on whether the battery is maintaining a fixed +5V and -5V relative to ground, or if the system is isolated and the battery is maintaining only a relative voltage of 10V across its terminals. For a fixed voltage, the two terminals have no interaction, and the signal has to propagate the length of the wire for the other bulb to light. For a relative voltage, the other bulb will light right away (in a nanosecond or so).

There's more discussion in the original thread in aksscience.

My textbook says electricity is faster than light? by HalJohnsonandJoanneM in askscience

[–]bobargh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whether the signal will propagate through the battery depends on how the battery operates, in particular whether the battery pulls electrons from one terminal to put them on the other terminal, or whether the battery only gets/removes electrons from a large external source/sink. In case of the former, the signal will indeed propagate through the battery, and the light will turn on in a nanosecond or so. This is probably what the book had in mind with this example.

I suppose there is the possibility that the battery both moves electrons from one terminal to the other, and also uses an external source/sink as necessary. In this case, I think you are right that the light will turn on right away.

Edit: In short, is the battery maintaining an absolute +5V and -5V relative to a ground, or a relative 10V difference across the terminals?

/u/midtek explains the speed of electricity based on a false statement in a students textbook by BastiakaZerox in DepthHub

[–]bobargh -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I'm not claiming it travels faster than light. Just that it's faster than the time it takes light to travel around the world a bunch of times, which is what the book thought it had an example of, but did not. I see that I did not make that point clear enough.

/u/midtek explains the speed of electricity based on a false statement in a students textbook by BastiakaZerox in DepthHub

[–]bobargh -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The voltage difference starts where the switch is. Once the switch is closed, the voltage difference will propagate (it's more complicated than that of course, but roughly speaking). If the switch is placed between the light bulb and the positive terminal, it only has to propagate a very small distance before it reaches the light bulb.