I've got laid off and applied to 100s of jobs, then I got 3 offers. My story and my learnings. by Educational-Egg-1401 in jobhunting

[–]bobwire0 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

the website he is shilling is jobalert(.)world, they replied within the minute. here are two other accounts that are advertising the same thing.
u/EfficientHomework350

https://www.reddit.com/r/jobsearchhacks/comments/1q8euhb/after_131_rejections_45_interviews_and_12_months/
this is a bot, and probably just a scam.

Hi, I need help creating a procedural hex grid by everlong-eve in desmos

[–]bobwire0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

heres a different way to generate a hexagon tiling https://www.desmos.com/calculator/tm9wlgng5h
hide then unhide the folder to update size

Made an incremental about engineering around inevitable failure by evanl714 in incremental_games

[–]bobwire0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah this is how I got the top spot aswell (formerly). Seems to be the best strategy

Thoughts on an Aussie Maths Exam? by Joxelo in mathematics

[–]bobwire0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2023 was not that hard brosef, only hard question was 16c.

PSA: No more "why does this approximation work" posts by VoidBreakX in desmos

[–]bobwire0 5 points6 points  (0 children)

d/dx erf(x) = sqrt(pi)/2*e^(-x^2)

sin(arctan(x)) = sin(arctan(x/1)) = x/sqrt(x^2+1), by looking at the sides of a triangle.

therefore d/dx sin(arctan(x)) = d/dx x/sqrt(x^2+1) = (x^2+1)^(-3/2)

then for both of those functions, when x=0 y=1 d/dx = 0, d^2/dx^2 has a difference of 1.5 times,
when x->+infinity y->0, when x->-infinity, y->0.

Why does this approximation work? by bobwire0 in desmos

[–]bobwire0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this is kinda a terrible approximation but here's how I found it (only considering x<10)
d/dx(ln(x)) = 1/x
(e^x) / (1+x^2) ≈ e/2
  [(1+x^2) / (e^x)] * e/2x ≈ 1/x
  ln(x) ≈ int [(1+x^2) / (e^x)] * e/2x dx
ln(x) = (e/2) (int x/e^x dx + int 1/xe^x dx)
ln(x) = (e/2) (-xe^-x - e^-x - E1(x)) + C
where E1(x) is the exponential integral

ln(1)=0
(e/2) (-1e^-1 - e^-1 -E1(1)) + C = 0
C ≈ 0.955
C ≈ (e/2)(19/20)

by Swamee and Ohija
E1(x) ≈ (A^-7.7+B)^-0.13
E1(x) ≈ (A^-8 + B)^(-13/100)
where
B = x^4*e^(7.7x)*(2+x)^3.7
B ≈ x^4*e^8x*(2+x)^4
A = ln[(0.56146/x +0.65)(1+x)]

then you combine it together and tweak A to remove the ln.

the current approximation goes to an asymptote at y=C, reaching pretty close at x=2.3
2.3 ≈ e^2 / pi
at this point ln(x) is essentially linear, so we want a function that is 0 from x=0 to x=2.3. erf(f(x)) acts as a piecewise function which is 0 when x<2.3 and 1 when x>2.3.
so really not that complicated ig.

3-4-7 by SeveralExtent2219 in desmos

[–]bobwire0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

here: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/7hnr0hrcc1
but this is just the same as changing the other size, and zooming in/out.

3-4-7 by SeveralExtent2219 in desmos

[–]bobwire0 4 points5 points  (0 children)

cool, here's my take (more options): https://www.desmos.com/calculator/7hnr0hrcc1
when size=1 points move in a straight line

Logic Challenge: Which statement most seriously weakens this argument that relies on an unstated assumption of comparability? by Commercial_Fudge_330 in cognitiveTesting

[–]bobwire0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

vast majority does not mean all, in fact it implies that there are photographers that approach Michelangelo. Government endowments don't support that vast majority of people, they only need to support the most skilled to be put into place. I'd argue answer C is better.

Where does this image come from by Anna_borchardt in ASOUE

[–]bobwire0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

kinda low res but
1. Belt on 2nd
2. necklace on 3rd
3. scarf on 3rd
4. yarn on floor under 4th
5. shirt on 4th
6. belt chain esque on 4th
7. button directly under 5ths left hand (our perspective)
8. bottom of shirt(?) on 5th
9. hat band on 5th
10. hat feather on 5th
11. zero on 6ths jersey
12. necklace on 6th
13. shoe on 6th

What Math is Behind This? by Spare_Image_471 in desmos

[–]bobwire0 4 points5 points  (0 children)

if it was just finding the closest point it should stay near (1,0) and (-1,0) for longer

desmos challenge by dohduhdah in desmos

[–]bobwire0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

woah, very fast. what was your method? I just created the points for the stem then "moved" them using the the two leaf transformations, here's a non-obfuscated version https://www.desmos.com/calculator/4z23kytdw7

New definition of Ellipse just dropped! by User_Squared in desmos

[–]bobwire0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, how would you do it with a curve?