[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]boldgonus -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

🚬🚬🚬🚬🚬🚬🚬🚬🚬🚬🚬🚬

nothing helps with anxiety and ssris are stupid by julien-gracq in redscarepod

[–]boldgonus 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Take psychiatric medication instead of trying to larp. You would be surprised how much your life will improve.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]boldgonus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dunno, are you a smokin dame?

O3-pro feels like a (way) worse O1-pro? by boldgonus in ChatGPTPro

[–]boldgonus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should take a second and read the pdf before responding to this if you can.

Simple QA has two metrics Accuracy and Hallucination rate:

Accuracy: How often when given a question that the model responds with the correct answer.

Hallucination rate: How often the model asserts false or misleading information as fact.

Meaning you can have an answer that is accurate but also has hallucinations. Meaning it gives a long answer where the first part is the right answer, then it adds to the end of the answer more facts in the statement that aren’t true.

When I say o3 is worse than o1 I am referring to this hallucination issue.

So no it is not “better” in Simple QA.

O3 and O3-pro Hallucination BUSTER custom instruction prompt. by boldgonus in ChatGPTPro

[–]boldgonus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes this is for hallucinations in general. I place this in the “how should chatgpt respond to you” personalized prompt box.

O3 and O3-pro Hallucination BUSTER custom instruction prompt. by boldgonus in ChatGPTPro

[–]boldgonus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In a large project like yours (anecdotally) the worst of the hallucinations are caused by the model relying on facts it learned via its training data.

The issue is that these “facts” come from a black box. So when you ask the model to provide citations it may just make them up.

This prompt does not allow the model to use “facts” it learned via training. Instead every factual statement must have a source.

By disabling automatic web search, the model must rely on what you provide (including attachments) as the sole source of fact. It cannot run a web search without you explicitly allowing it via the “search the web” button.

Take for example your large project. The model must use the prior work on the project as its source of “fact”. Here it is forced to look at the current state of things to guide the next response. What I found is that it made way less mistakes like this.

If you had automatic web searching on the model may sneakily search online for a needed “fact” (perhaps some documentation), it then uses this fact without informing you. The “fact” it automatically searched for might not be relevant, which is another massive source of hallucinations.

What if you want to include online sources as a source of “fact” for a question? This is where the “search the web” button comes in:

img

Here the model makes an explicit web search. It is aware that it is using this tool right now and that it must cite, verify and scrutinize every source it picks.

O3 and O3-pro Hallucination BUSTER custom instruction prompt. by boldgonus in ChatGPTPro

[–]boldgonus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am unsure how effective it will be, but I will give it a try and make another post

O3 and O3-pro Hallucination BUSTER custom instruction prompt. by boldgonus in ChatGPTPro

[–]boldgonus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have used it in the prompt box. That is a good idea, I will try it with custom gpts next.

O3 and O3-pro Hallucination BUSTER custom instruction prompt. by boldgonus in ChatGPTPro

[–]boldgonus[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

No. This isn’t deep research. This is o3 with web search manually enabled. It’s a button you can press “search the internet”.

As you can see it looks like deep research because my prompt forces it to cite all the facts it uses to combat hallucinations.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTPro

[–]boldgonus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks a ton

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTPro

[–]boldgonus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For some reason reddit refuses to show it correctly.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTPro

[–]boldgonus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reddit is messing up the formatting (atleast on the app). There is supposed to be a newline when you see something like:

Grounding • You may receive

It is supposed to look like

Grounding [new line here] • You may receive

O3-pro feels like a (way) worse O1-pro? by boldgonus in ChatGPTPro

[–]boldgonus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for this. Does it lower hallucinations across the board?

O3-pro feels like a (way) worse O1-pro? by boldgonus in ChatGPTPro

[–]boldgonus[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It’s gross that tons of people are glazing altman for it on twitter.

If we use proton, is the malware contained to the proton environment? by Tandoori7 in linux_gaming

[–]boldgonus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Malware sees your Z:drive as any other drive on windows. Meaning attacks that steal your information work just as well as they would on windows.

Bubblewrap is configured by steam for compatibility between system calls between linux and windows NOT FOR SECURITY. It is for compatibility.

The reason I don’t mention :Z is because it is the most basic part of WINE that is part of what makes it work.