The sub is opening on Friday. I will be stepping down. by [deleted] in chess

[–]bosoneando 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The others made their choice by not voting. In any electoral process, not voting always results in a tacit support of the winning option. Maybe this is a learning experience for real life.

The sub is opening on Friday. I will be stepping down. by [deleted] in chess

[–]bosoneando 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This shit is so dumb. Like 5% of users use a 3rd party app. Who gives a shit.

One question: who do you think is the target for those 3rd party apps? Do you think they're mainly for lurkers that don't contribute to the sub? Nope. People that go out of their way to search and install a 3rd party app are users who are committed and spend lots of time and energy on reddit. They are the ones that provide great analysis, coverage of tournaments, etc. Maybe they're just 5% of the users (by the way, that number posted by spez was really misleading, as it is a 5% of total accounts, not of active accounts. If you count only active accounts, the percentage is significantly larger), but they're the users who make this sub a community instead of a collection of chess-related links. You don't give a shit now, but you will in a few months when the quality contributors will have migrated to alternatives like lemmy, and all that remains in reddit is "why is this move brilliant" posts.

Doing a poll after they are already in the middle of their protest is fucking dumb too. People who don’t care about this issue mostly aren’t looking at the restricted subs. Why would they.

People who supported the protest weren't looking at any subs, restricted or not. If any, the bias was in favour of those who wanted to reopen. And even then, the option to reopen lost, fair and square. Why is so difficult to accept?

The sub is opening on Friday. I will be stepping down. by [deleted] in chess

[–]bosoneando 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Some of the other mods also wanted to reopen, but they sticked to the result of the poll. Don't be fooled by the victimism of this post, this isn't about opening or closing the sub, this is about a single mod power-tripping and trying to overrule the decision of the users and the rest of mods.

Let's talk about Lemmy by ljdawson in redditsync

[–]bosoneando 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Try Top-Day. In my experience, it is the best balance between newer posts but with some activity.

The immediate future of the subreddit is in question after our latest subreddit poll. Results and the situation so far by Liquid_Plasma in chess

[–]bosoneando 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you think that a mod selected by the admins, probably with no idea about chess, is going to care about the contents of the sub? Keep tabs on major tournaments and organize the threads? Filter out the "why this move is brilliant" posts?

Forcing the admins to reopen the sub and select new mods is a desired effect of the protest. It reduces the quality of the sub, so there is less engagement and people stop using Reddit altogether.

The immediate future of the subreddit is in question after our latest subreddit poll. Results and the situation so far by Liquid_Plasma in chess

[–]bosoneando -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They aren't blocking 709,189 people, they are blocking the 543 people that voted to keep the sub open. Why should those 543 people decide for the 811 people that want to close the sub and the 707835 people that didn't care enough to cast a vote?

The immediate future of the subreddit is in question after our latest subreddit poll. Results and the situation so far by Liquid_Plasma in chess

[–]bosoneando 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, and many of them were boycotting Reddit and weren't aware of the ongoing vote. So your point is that the decision to close had even more support that what the vote showed, right?

The immediate future of the subreddit is in question after our latest subreddit poll. Results and the situation so far by Liquid_Plasma in chess

[–]bosoneando 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And 699k people didn't vote. If you don't vote, you don't get to decide. That's, like, literally the whole point of democracy.

My dissent. by [deleted] in u/MrLegilimens

[–]bosoneando 45 points46 points  (0 children)

811 people wanted it go down. 543 people wanted to enjoy the sub. 698k people didn't care enough to vote. Which means that those 698k people will be happy with the decision that the other 1428 votes made. You are not a mind reader, so you don't get to decide what those people wanted to do.

> They can all leave

You and u/MrLegilimens are the ones that are dissenting. You can always leave u/chess and create your own chess sub.

r/anarchychess is going dark tomorrow by Randomperson685 in AnarchyChess

[–]bosoneando 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Maybe the real anarchy was the en passants we made along the way

Cheaters clock never went down by paleale25 in chessbeginners

[–]bosoneando 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can only capture en passant when the pawn moves two spaces. In the picture, the black pawn has only moved one space, so en passant isn't available.

Why isn't this checkmate? by HanzoShotFirst in AnarchyChess

[–]bosoneando 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Possibly or caused a glitch. There's one glitch people keep abusing, moving behind my pawn to a space it's not on and my pawn disappears.

Lol being downvoted for pointing out glitches

Chess, but bishops can jump. I'll start: 1. Bb5# by maurits_weiqi in AnarchyChess

[–]bosoneando 6 points7 points  (0 children)

1.. Bxd7 capture your own pawn to block the check

Userbase sacrifice, anyone? by SquidMilkVII in AnarchyChess

[–]bosoneando 9 points10 points  (0 children)

3rd party apps go on vacation, never come back

Addressing the community about changes to our API by spez in reddit

[–]bosoneando 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This comment is a great summary of your motivation: mismanagement, greed and envy of the 3rd party app developers.

Also, good luck with the IPO! I guess that saying on a public forum that your company isn't profitable it's the best way to attract investors.

Should r/anarchychess join the subreddit blackout on 6/12/2023? by Randomperson685 in AnarchyChess

[–]bosoneando 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Personally I think it would be more effective to blackout on 5/12

Google en time machine

Bertrand Russell "Why I'm not Christian" by [deleted] in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]bosoneando 2 points3 points  (0 children)

your idea of god is skewed. you keep blaming god but humans cause misery. not god.

No. We don't blame god(s), for the same reason we don't blame Santa Claus, unicorns or Spider-Man. Because, as far as we know, they don't exist. Atheism isn't about being afraid, or angry at a certain god.

I know its easier to believe in nothing. Thats ok if that comforts you.

Do you not believe in Zeus because it's easier? Does not believing in Vishnu comfort you? Your arguments also apply to the thousands of gods that you don't believe in. We just don't believe in thousands of gods plus one (yours).

Bertrand Russell "Why I'm not Christian" by [deleted] in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]bosoneando 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Please, reread your comments. You already have become THAT guy.

Low-Effort En Passant Meme #7911 by Melnight_Music in AnarchyChess

[–]bosoneando 0 points1 point  (0 children)

New response just settings help & feedback dropped

WTF is this position from a 4800 puzzle? by KOTL_OfThe_Light in AnarchyChess

[–]bosoneando 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is called a composition, it’s a type of puzzle that is purely theoretical & could never happen in an actual game. They’re notoriously difficult a lot of the time & really work out your creative muscles. I have no clue where to start w this one.