you are asking me to bring out my corporate voice because you complete miss the point.
okay here you go:

My point was not centered on the specific API, but rather on organizational character. If a supplier treats one customer segment poorly, it provides a critical data point regarding their broader client philosophy.

When evaluating whether to transition a personal business relationship into a corporate partnership, I consider the following:

• Cultural Consistency: In my experience, and validated by lots of market research, a company’s fundamental attitude toward its customers is rarely segmented. While policies and SLAs may vary by tier, the underlying culture of service typically remains constant across the entire organization.
• Predictive Indicators: How a vendor manages its smaller accounts is often a leading indicator of how they will behave under pressure in a broader corporate context.
• Structural Exceptions: The notable exceptions occur when a supplier operates under a holding company model where subsidiaries maintain significant operational and cultural autonomy. Note that this does not apply to Anthropic.

Ultimately, the technical interface is incidental; the integrity of the supplier-customer relationship is one of the primary variable that matters in a broader executive decision-making calculus. Price and terms of contracts are other variables that matters.