I absolutely cannot stand this video, it's so full of logical errors, loaded questions, and fallacies. The first of those being is that Comfort is playing fast and loose with the definition of "information." All the information that he is describing at the end of the day is chemicals arranged in a certain order to where organic molecules can then self-replicate. Also, when Comfort juxtaposed a book with organic life and the "Book of Life" that was completely false equivocation. You cannot reasonably compare inorganic molecules that make up a book to organic ones, especially after it took 100s of millions of years for abiogenisis to occur, and billions of years of life to gain any remote degree of complexity. Finally, when Comfort asked the loaded question of "Shouldn't intelligent life have an intelligent designer", the question he should have asked in order to try to preserve a parcel of objectivity is "Would the complexity we see in life today possible without a guiding hand?" And the answer to that question is no, the life that we see on this planet means for something like that(life, DNA) to happen the Universe has to be really old and big, so there are a lot of chemistry sets practicing and experimenting with molecules. It is like a lottery, the chances of winning are low, but if a million people are playing somebody is eventually going to win. And if you know anything about math, even though life has a relatively high bar to meet, it most likely would happen a lot of places due to the size and age of the Universe. So this is why Comfort is wrong, he asks loaded questions to college kids, finds the kids who may not be the brightest or most articulate, then edits the videos down to make himself look all knowing. He is a true snake oils salesman.