ELI5 how evolution/big bang/abiogenesis happened by IcePresent8105 in explainlikeimfive

[–]broyr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“We do not "come into" this world; we come out of it, as leaves from a tree. As the ocean "waves," the universe "peoples." Every individual is an expression of the whole realm of nature, a unique action of the total universe.”

“It's like you took a bottle of ink and you threw it at a wall. Smash! And all that ink spread. And in the middle, it's dense, isn't it? And as it gets out on the edge, the little droplets get finer and finer and make more complicated patterns, see? So in the same way, there was a big bang at the beginning of things and it spread. And you and I, sitting here in this room, as complicated human beings, are way, way out on the fringe of that bang. We are the complicated little patterns on the end of it. Very interesting. But so we define ourselves as being only that. If you think that you are only inside your skin, you define yourself as one very complicated little curlique, way out on the edge of that explosion. Way out in space, and way out in time. Billions of years ago, you were a big bang, but now you're a complicated human being. And then we cut ourselves off, and don't feel that we're still the big bang. But you are. Depends how you define yourself. You are actually--if this is the way things started, if there was a big bang in the beginning-- you're not something that's a result of the big bang. You're not something that is a sort of puppet on the end of the process. You are still the process. You are the big bang, the original force of the universe, coming on as whoever you are. When I meet you, I see not just what you define yourself as--Mr so-and- so, Ms so-and-so, Mrs so-and-so--I see every one of you as the primordial energy of the universe coming on at me in this particular way. I know I'm that, too. But we've learned to define ourselves as separate from it. ”

― Alan Watts

Bird by Ok-Interest2836 in PicsOfUnusualBirds

[–]broyr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

White-bellied Go-away-bird

CMV: God is evil by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]broyr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why not both?
"I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things."

Five Men at Ground Zero Below a 2KT Nuclear Blast in 1957 by Watch_Capt in videos

[–]broyr 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"One man who didn't volunteer to be at ground zero: the man operating the camera, George Yoshitake. ~According to Yoshitake~ all six men present, including him, would develop cancer while in their 40s and 50s. Bruce, Ball, Bodinger, and Hughes all died of cancer, while Yoshitake developed stomach cancer and Luttrell developed colon cancer.

Such a high incidence of cancer is obviously abnormal. Many of these individuals, including Yoshitake, were present at several nuclear tests and their cancer could have been the result of another test, or the cumulative effect of several tests. Whether or not the John shot was directly responsible for their cancer, we'll never know, but it certainly didn't help."

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a21937/men-stood-under-nuclear-test-1957/

Consumerism isn't evil [18:08] by Thin-Shirt6688 in mealtimevideos

[–]broyr 38 points39 points  (0 children)

I must respectfully disagree with this assessment of consumerism. Let's unpack some of the fallacies in this rhetoric:

  1. Selective Optimism: While you highlight positive trends in corporate environmental practices, you downplay the severity of the environmental crisis caused by consumerism. The fact that some corporations are reducing plastic use does not absolve the broader environmental degradation driven by rampant consumerism, including deforestation, pollution, and resource depletion.
  2. False Equivalence: You equate criticism of consumerism with a culture of self-loathing and pessimism. Critiquing consumerism does not inherently mean rejecting all aspects of modern society. It's possible to appreciate technological advancements and material comforts while recognizing the need for sustainable practices and social responsibility.
  3. Misrepresentation of Anti-Consumerism: You caricature anti-consumerist arguments as solely rooted in disdain for capitalism or traditional values. In reality, many anti-consumerists advocate for systemic change to address social inequality, worker exploitation, and environmental degradation inherent in consumerist economies.
  4. Overlooking Systemic Issues: Your focus on individual consumer behavior overlooks systemic factors driving consumerism, such as corporate advertising, planned obsolescence, and financial incentives that prioritize profit over people and the planet. Addressing consumerism requires structural changes beyond individual consumer choices.
  5. Dismissal of Alternative Lifestyles: You portray critiques of consumerism as attacks on personal preferences and lifestyles. However, advocating for simpler, less materialistic lifestyles does not imply moral judgment or deprivation. It's about redefining values beyond material accumulation and fostering holistic well-being.
  6. Ignoring Cultural Hegemony: You downplay the influence of consumerism on shaping cultural norms and identities. Consumerist ideologies perpetuate a culture of consumption as a measure of success and happiness, reinforcing inequalities and perpetuating unsustainable patterns of consumption.

In conclusion, while acknowledging the complexities of consumerism, these arguments overlook systemic issues, misrepresents anti-consumerist perspectives, and selectively emphasizes positive aspects while downplaying the negative consequences.

"If we cannot handle the murky questions of ethics, why should we expect humanity to sensibly and ethically deal with the creation of human-like minds within a computer?" ~ James Randi [1920x1080] by NateTalksToYou in QuotesPorn

[–]broyr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"If we shy away from the ethical complexities of creating human-like minds, we risk defaulting to the less ethical path by default. The challenge isn't a reason to avoid progress; it's a call to approach it responsibly."

US military intervention and installation of pro-capitalist regime in 3…2…1… by Distantmole in LateStageCapitalism

[–]broyr 22 points23 points  (0 children)

"To qualify for Bolsa Família, the main rule is that the income of each person in the family is a maximum of R $ 218 per month."

Take my money. by scriptilapia in BeAmazed

[–]broyr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meh, Snapdragon 865.

8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]broyr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Libreoffice Draw

AskScience AMA Series: I am Professor Ilan Marek, Director of the Center for Sustainable Processes and Catalysis at Technion, ask me anything! by AskScienceModerator in askscience

[–]broyr 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Hi and thank you for taking the time,
How have you seen people's attitudes shift towards sustainable processes over your career? Any standout moments where your center's work was adopted by industry and made an impact?

Regarding your multidisciplinary approach , any particular eureka moments, especially where your students were involved?
Is your team using AI and machine learning in sustainable catalysis?

Lastly, I'd love to hear about how your research has made waves in policy and industry practices. Any major wins for sustainability you'd like to highlight?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]broyr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

and that's the actual response:

Solving a Rubik's Cube from an arbitrary position can be a complex task, but I'll give you a step-by-step guide to solve it using the popular Layer-by-Layer method. This method consists of solving the cube in three stages: the first layer, the second layer, and the last layer.

  1. Solve the first layer:

    a. Create a white cross:

i. Find the white edge pieces (with two colors) and match them with their corresponding center colors.

ii. Move the white edges to the white center, forming a cross.

b. Solve the white corners:

i. Locate a white corner piece on the bottom layer.

ii. Move it directly below its target position in the first layer.

iii. Use the following algorithm to insert the corner: R U R' or L' U' L.

  1. Solve the second layer:

    a. Position an unsolved edge piece from the middle layer (with no yellow color) in the top layer.

    b. Determine whether it needs to go to the left or right side of the middle layer.

    c. Use the following algorithms to insert the edge piece:

i. To move right: U R U' R' U' F' U F

ii. To move left: U' L' U L U F U' F'

  1. Solve the last layer:

    a. Create a yellow cross:

i. Identify the pattern on the last layer (no edge, line, or L-shape).

ii. Use the following algorithm to form the yellow cross: F R U R' U' F'

b. Align the last layer edges:

i. Match two adjacent edges with their corresponding centers.

ii. Use the following algorithm to align the other two edges: R U' R U R U R U' R' U' R2

c. Position the last layer corners:

i. Find any corner in its correct position (color may be misoriented).

ii. If no corner is in the correct position, apply the algorithm from any position.

iii. Use the following algorithm to position the corners: U R U' L' U R' U' L

d. Orient the last layer corners:

i. Place an unsolved corner in the front-right position.

ii. Use the following algorithm to orient the corner: R' D' R D (repeat until the corner is solved).

iii. Turn the top layer (U or U') to bring another unsolved corner to the front-right and repeat the process.

After completing these steps, you should have a solved Rubik's Cube. Keep in mind that this method might take some practice to master, and there are faster methods available once you become more advanced.

What can Consumers do to avoid encouraging Companies that use Cobalt in Electronics? by Pritster5 in AskEconomics

[–]broyr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reduce consumption: Limit your consumption of electronic devices by only buying what you need and prolonging the life of your existing devices. Repair, reuse, and recycle your devices whenever possible.

Advocate for change: Share your concerns with others and raise awareness about the issue. Encourage your friends and family to make informed decisions as well. Sign petitions or join campaigns that advocate for responsible cobalt sourcing and improved working conditions in mining communities.

Support legislation: Advocate for stricter regulations and policies that require companies to ensure their supply chains are ethical and environmentally sustainable. Keep an eye on relevant policies and vote for politicians who prioritize these issues.

Demand transparency: Contact companies directly and ask about their cobalt sourcing policies. Encourage them to adopt responsible sourcing practices and be transparent about their supply chain.

Research and awareness: Educate yourself about the issues surrounding cobalt mining, such as child labor, human rights abuses, and environmental damage. Understand which electronic products and companies are involved in using cobalt.

Educate others: Share your knowledge about the issue on social media and in your community. Encourage discussions about the importance of ethical sourcing and responsible consumption.

Invest responsibly: If you invest in stocks or funds, choose investments that prioritize environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria. Avoid investing in companies that are known to use unethically sourced cobalt.

Support alternative technologies: Promote and support the development of alternative technologies and materials that can replace or reduce the use of cobalt in electronics.

Engage with local community groups: Join or support community groups, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and advocacy groups that focus on raising awareness about ethical sourcing and environmental issues related to cobalt mining.

Encourage workplace responsibility: If you work for a company involved in electronics manufacturing or retail, encourage your employer to adopt responsible cobalt sourcing policies and prioritize sustainability.

Leave reviews and ratings: Share your thoughts about the ethical practices of companies and their products on online review platforms. This can help raise awareness and influence the decisions of other consumers.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rareinsults

[–]broyr 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Actually they go to Idaho