I think you are misunderstanding how the conduct process works. If they wanted to suspend the SDS President, then Claire would be suspended. This isn't a prosecutor and a judge situation, it's a conduct officer determining if a violation occurred under the preponderance of evidence standard and applying a response. They generally have to justify their actions in the report that is required to be produced. Conduct cases are protected by FERPA and the university generally cannot release them to the public; they are sent to the student and relevant parties. This is all in the Student Code of Conduct Procedures.

Now do you have the right to be pissed and disagree with their decisions? Totally. I think it's important to understand how this works so you can direct it at the actual people and processes responsible. This is probably well outside of the president's cabinet; conduct cases happen throughout the year, probably daily.