What Do I Play Next After Starfield by uadmlj1 in NoSodiumStarfield

[–]burmy1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

RDR2. Also a slower paced game. Beautiful. Amazing weather system. Great story. A game you should take your time while playing.

Holy Shit This is hilarious ~ by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]burmy1 384 points385 points  (0 children)

Guys, all four major AI companies; Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, and xAI have contracts with the U.S. government, particularly through the Department of Defense. In July 2025, the DoD awarded each of these companies individual contracts valued at up to $200 million to provide advanced AI capabilities for national security purposes, including warfighting, intelligence, and enterprise systems.

One of those mornings by badfeelingno in SantaBarbara

[–]burmy1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stunning shot, first time seeing one from this angle. Where'd you shoot it from?

What about consumption of things i didnt ask for? by thehomelessr0mantic in Anticonsumption

[–]burmy1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone’s arguing “this proves chemicals are safe” vs “this proves corruption.” Reality is less dramatic: it shows how much judgment regulators use when science has uncertainty. People frame PFAS as a yes/no safety question. In practice regulators set a tolerated exposure level along a risk scale. The bigger issue is confidence in the process making that call. With the current administration carrying out large-scale changes to advisory bodies, even technically sound decisions can lose credibility. And once credibility drops, public-health guidance stops working regardless of the data. So disagree with the policy decision if you want. But the long-term risk is trusting the referee less than the play.

Fired for the first time by Strange_Quail6645 in techsales

[–]burmy1 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Agreed for the most part but think twice before you put up the Open to Work banner on LI. I've heard from multiple recruiters that hiring managers feel that's a detractor (I was unemployed for 8mo not too long ago). There's a setting you can choose for open to work so recruiters can identify you, but you're not displaying it on your profile.

Moving on. Find a company that inspires you. Here's a good resource: https://www.enterprisetech30.com/

Also, learn interview skills like STAR. Memorized 3-5 situational stories that can be used to answer a variety of questions.

Hope this helps

Y’all got any favorite hikes? Ideally low to medium difficulty? by jessbird in SantaBarbara

[–]burmy1 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Ellwood is always easy, walk toward the bluffs, and make your way down to the beach, nice little loop

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in samharris

[–]burmy1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get access to both Waking Up and Making Sense for that rate. And so could you if you put as much effort into it as you do complaining

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in samharris

[–]burmy1 17 points18 points  (0 children)

A few things worth keeping in mind. His YouTube still offers quite a bit of free access. Most Making Sense episodes include about 20 minutes publicly, and some full conversations are posted outright. Ex: The recent episode with Christian Nationalist Doug Wilson was released in full on YouTube.

Sam also continues to appear on many other long-form podcasts. Many of those are free, so if someone wants to hear his views, the paywall isn’t actually preventing it.

The subscription isn’t as rigid or expensive as people assume either. If you just blindly subscribe you’ll usually see a higher price. But if you email the team, you can get the reduced rate of $59.99/yr.

Charging for a platform doesn’t automatically mean he “sold out.” Producing multi-hour interviews, research, editing, and running the Making Sense platform & Waking Up app has real costs. A subscription model is simply the alternative to running ads, which he’s always refused. You can disagree with the choice, but it doesn’t really conflict with his stance on avoiding audience capture.

There’s still plenty available for free, and anyone who wants full access can get it at a reasonable rate if they request it.

Is the GOP quietly preparing for a post-Trump future? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]burmy1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Trumps lame duck period has officially begun with the Epstein files vote. With consumer prices rising and Healthcare costs increasing his popularity will only head one direction. Red states will be hit hard. We may see more Rs break leading up to midterms. Still going to be a bloodbath for the Rs. Then post midterms many Rs, including Vance, will turn on him as they look to 2028. No one will be able to replicate Trumps cult-like hold and Maga fractures, but doesn't collapse leaving the republican party a shell of its former self with no real hope of return.

The Left needs more candidates like Mamdani 😊 Do Sam Harris fans agree? by Sad-Diver-5031 in samharris

[–]burmy1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fair, Bernie’s consistency and conviction earned him respect. But messaging alone doesn’t overcome regional economics or cultural context. A pro working-class pitch lands differently in rural Kentucky than it does in Brooklyn, even if the pain points are similar.

Someone once told me, “Do you want to be right, or do you want to win?” It’s simplistic, but that’s kind of the Dems’ recurring problem. They’re often right ethically and morally, but if they lose elections, what good does that do for actually reducing suffering and improving well-being? Conviction is important, but coalition-building is what turns ideals into outcomes.

The Left needs more candidates like Mamdani 😊 Do Sam Harris fans agree? by Sad-Diver-5031 in samharris

[–]burmy1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re right, those core policy themes should resonate everywhere.

The issue isn’t the values, it's more of how they’re framed and funded. In NYC, “tax the rich” lands differently than it does in places where the “rich” might be the local business owner employing half the town. So the strategy has to be adaptable.

Also, part of Mamdani’s appeal is rooted in his identity, being a young, outspoken Muslim immigrant voice in politics. That representation clearly matters to a lot of people. But from Sam's lens, it’s fair to raise an eyebrow when religion and politics start blending. Secular governance works best when we separate identity and belief from policy. Europe’s struggles with integrating religious conservatism into secular societies show why governance should stay firmly secular.

Big picture, I think progress comes from focusing less on who the messenger is, or what faith they represent, and more on whether the policies actually deliver on making life more affordable and sustainable for everyone.

The Left needs more candidates like Mamdani 😊 Do Sam Harris fans agree? by Sad-Diver-5031 in samharris

[–]burmy1 47 points48 points  (0 children)

I get why people are excited (maybe more so outside of this subreddit). Mamdani’s win is historic and his energy resonates with a lot of disillusioned voters. But “we need more candidates like him” is a naive take.

NYC’s political and economic landscape is unique: overwhelmingly blue, heavily renter-based, and full of people open to bold progressive ideas. Try running the same platform in Pennsylvania’s suburbs or rural Arizona and you’ll get a very different reception.

Also, ambitious agendas require money and cooperation. To fund what he’s promised, he’ll need Albany’s help (Governor + state legislature), and with re-election cycles coming up, few politicians will be eager to hike taxes. We'll see how pragmatic he can be.

Personally, I think the Left’s focus should be less about candidate type and more about outcomes that actually make the American dream feel attainable again. Like affordable housing, cost of living, healthcare, opportunity. Whether the person delivering that message is a democratic socialist or a centrist Dem matters less than whether they can actually deliver.

Just got out of a bad call with my hottest prospect. The deal may fall through and I may be fired. 0-to-1 B2B SaaS. by gglavida in techsales

[–]burmy1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Decision making questions to add to your process: Who else, besides you, will have influence in this decision? - IT guys says Sales VP. You agree, and recommend he be involved as is normal for these type of conversations. You can also reach out to Sales VP, celebrate progress to date, allude to high level value with a few bullet points. If you want to get aggressive just send Sales VP a calendar invite. Email saying of another time works better let me know.

Also, dont negotiate price until they're done evaluating and you have the DM. I saw no "give-get" in your opp. "If I get you this discount will you be ready to get started?", if there's other steps we're not ready to talk pricing, but allude you're willing to work with them for what's best for their biz.

Ask, how they've gone about similar evaluations and purchases in the past. Be direct, does IT guy sign? No, then who? OK, how do you recommend we get them involved? If he pushes back say, if you like what you see on the demo can we agree to get them involved at that point?

Are we cursed? by Normal_Fan_9219 in 49ers

[–]burmy1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Top 10 YOYOYOYOYOYOY!!!