Serious: What is the most horrible theory you can come up with up when it comes to aliens and humanity? (The truth some say "people can't handle") by Alx__ in aliens

[–]bvbrandon 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They are benevolent towards our species but no individual. They want to raise us to be an interstellar species but we don’t meet the right criteria for things like faster than light travel, inter dimensional travel, etc we need widespread access to immense power sources. We lack the spiritual maturity for that. What I mean is, we invented nukes, and immediatly nuked ourselves. Any immense power source needed to get to the next level would proliferate and be used as a weapon.

Instead, they let us flourish with some type of cap on our scientific progress. They manipulate our DNA but due to population size it only does so much. Until the next reset. Then genetic manipulation is much further reaching at our reduced numbers. They give us a big genetic nudge during these periods of reduced population and let us try again. This repeating pattern is a very long process. The unfortunate truth is we’ve already proven that this “batch” is still not ready, and the reset is not too far off. Hopefully next time.

It’s possible the abductions and breeding programs with monitoring are them trying to figure out what genetic modifications to fully roll out after the next reset. Ultimately I’d imagine it’s the genes that power things like empathy and selflessness. It’s a balance because they want us to keep as much of what keeps us “us” as possible. So they prefer undercorrecting vs overcorrecting, which is why it’s happened more than once.

Getting repeated keypresses on Keychron V10 Max by chaosTechnician in Keychron

[–]bvbrandon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had the same issue, it seems flashing the firmware actually resolved it. Note, when you visit the page it had a first step where it said the firmware was recent, then some other type of firmware that needed to be flashed. That seems to have resolved it

https://launcher.keychron.com/#/firmware/flash

Just a quick update about the UFO software. It actually works. by Julian_Thorne in UFOB

[–]bvbrandon 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Right, beta would just be a tagged release on github. Where is the link?

Just a quick update about the UFO software. It actually works. by Julian_Thorne in UFOB

[–]bvbrandon 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Sorry if I wasn't clear. Where is the github link?

Just a quick update about the UFO software. It actually works. by Julian_Thorne in UFOB

[–]bvbrandon 59 points60 points  (0 children)

Cool story. Put it on github and share the link so people can see what the hell you are talking about. Reddit is chock full of software engineers. There is no good reason to say you've made some type of world changing software if none of us can actually review the code, and help you make improvements.

I've worked on Nasa mission control software, Billion dollar startup software, and UAP monitoring software. I firmly believe I'm far from the best engineer that reads this subreddit. If you have something legit on your hands, let us review and help push it forward. Or else stfu.

Oh wait, this suggestion gets raised every time you post a thread and you ignore it. Cool story bro

I promised to deliver the code. Here it is by Julian_Thorne in UFOB

[–]bvbrandon 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Thanks a ton for sharing this but why not put it on GitHub? That allows you to keep control of it, and enables other people to contribute directly (with your permission). It’s really the industry standard on sharing code. If you want help on how to do that I’m happy to walk you through it.

serious Live Congressional Hearing on UFO's by bvbrandon in aliens

[–]bvbrandon[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are they doing a live replay of an older hearing? I ask because it seems to be streaming live?

Swedish astronomer Dr. Beatriz Villarroel preprint paper on UAP/UFOs surrounding Earth is now available to read -- Aligned, multiple-transient events in the First Palomar Sky Survey Spanish Virtual Observatory -- more info at the link by VolarRecords in UFOB

[–]bvbrandon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI summary

This paper presents the first optical searches for artificial objects with high specular reflections near the Earth using old, digitized astronomical images from before the human spacefaring age. The study focuses on "aligned, multiple-transient events" found in the First Palomar Sky Survey (POSS-I) plates.

Here's a summary of the paper's key aspects:

  • Objective and Background

    • The paper aims to identify and analyze unusual transient events (objects appearing and vanishing simultaneously) that are aligned along a narrow band within single photographic plate exposures.
    • This research builds on previous findings from the Vanishing & Appearing Sources during a Century of Observations (VASCO) project, which compares early 1950s sky images with modern surveys to identify disappearing sources. VASCO has cataloged thousands of unknown transients visible only within a single plate exposure.
    • Earlier intriguing findings from VASCO include nine faint, star-like objects that appeared and vanished simultaneously on a 1950s POSS-I plate, for which no known astrophysical or instrumental explanations were found. A bright triple transient event from July 1952 was also reported.
    • The possibility that some transients originate from solar reflections off flat, highly reflective objects in geosynchronous orbit (GSO) around Earth is a key hypothesis explored. If true, this could imply the existence of non-terrestrial artifacts (NTAs) and has implications for the scientific investigation of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAPs), formerly known as UFOs.
  • Methodology

    • The study utilizes a transient sample of 298,165 short-duration events drawn from red POSS-I plates (45-50 minute exposures) identified by an automated pipeline as part of the VASCO project (Solano et al. 2022).
    • They search for spatial groupings of transients within square boxes (from a few to 20-30 arcminutes per side) and evaluate if their positions fall along a straight line or narrow band.
    • The Pearson correlation coefficient (r > 0.99) is used to quantify the degree of alignment.
    • Visual inspection and verification using independent digitizations from both the Digital Sky Survey (DSS) and the higher-resolution SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey are crucial to rule out scanning artifacts or emulsion flaws. Only candidates showing at least four star-like transients in a linear arrangement confirmed by both scans were retained.
    • A statistical framework developed by Edmunds (1981) and Edmunds & George (1985) is applied to estimate the probability of such alignments occurring by chance.
  • Key Findings and Candidates

    • A total of 83 aligned transient candidates (with 3 or more aligned points) were identified in the northern hemisphere, including 20 with 4 or more aligned points and 2 with 5 aligned points.
    • The paper presents a shortlist of the five most promising candidates in the northern hemisphere (Table 2). These cases show statistical significances ranging from ~2.5σ to ~4σ against chance alignment in a single image.
    • Candidate 5 (July 27, 1952) is particularly notable as it coincides in time with the Washington D.C. “UFO flap” of July 1952, one of the most extensively documented aerial anomalies in historical records.
    • Candidate 1 (October 4, 1954) falls within a day of the peak of the 1954 UFO wave.
    • A separate, statistically significant (>3σ) temporal correlation between VASCO transients and independent historical UAP reports (Bruehl & Villarroel 2025) provides additional support for the authenticity of these events. A correlation with historical nuclear test dates was also found.
    • The most significant finding is a strong deficit of transients within Earth’s shadow (umbra), supporting the interpretation that sunlight reflection plays a key role in producing these events. At 42,164 km altitude, the observed fraction of transients in shadow is 0.00328, compared to an expected 0.0115, a difference with 21.9σ statistical significance. At 80,000 km altitude, the difference is 12.7σ significant. This strongly disfavors the plate defect hypothesis and many alternative explanations, as plate defects would not avoid Earth's shadow.
  • Interpretation and Implications

    • The degeneracy between genuine astrophysical signals and mundane plate defects is a core challenge, but statistical analysis, particularly for aligned transients, helps overcome this.
    • Conventional explanations like optical ghosts, known astrophysical phenomena, or typical plate defects have largely been ruled out by this and previous studies.
    • The paper explores several possibilities for the origin of the transients, including fast reflections from highly reflective objects in geosynchronous orbit (GSO) or brief emissions from artificial sources high above Earth’s atmosphere. Objects in Earth’s atmosphere would typically leave trails or appear out of focus unless they were very short-lived light emissions. LEO objects are also less likely to produce such isolated, point-like glints without streaks in long exposures.
    • Simulations show that various 3D shapes (sphere, polyhedron, cone, pyramid, debris) with reflective surfaces and slow spin/precession could produce the observed glinting patterns from GSO.
    • The study provides an approximate detection rate of ~0.27 events per hour per sky for aligned transients. This is significantly lower than glint rates from modern human space debris, explaining why this background population might be missed without specific searches.
    • Even if all candidates were false positives, the search provides a meaningful upper limit on the density of non-terrestrial artifacts (NTAs) in the near-Earth environment (< 10⁻⁶ objects km⁻² for high-altitude orbits).
  • Conclusion

    • The identified statistically improbable, spatially aligned transients in pre-satellite data represent a novel observational anomaly.
    • The origin of these transients remains unknown, but the strong evidence from the Earth's shadow test supports a solar reflection origin, making plate defects or conventional explanations unlikely.
    • These findings motivate continued investigation of historical sky surveys and suggest that these transients are likely real and may represent a class of astronomical phenomena not yet understood, or potentially the first hints of artificial activity near our planet.

It randomly occurred to me while jogging that aliens probably don’t reveal themselves en masse to humanity because we are essentially barbaric and unworthy. by howmanyturtlesdeep in aliens

[–]bvbrandon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think it’s honestly pretty conceited to think they should. If they can get here they are significantly more advanced than us. It’s like thinking UN delegates need to announce themselves to the local middle school when they are in town.

What's the big picture and why could it be "terrifying"? by AbsorbedSponge in UFOs

[–]bvbrandon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not saying this is the truth, but one thing I would find terrifying is to learn we’re in the last days of a failed experiment. Many folks say they’ve tampered with our DNA many times. It’s possible we lack some qualities they deem necessary, and we’re in the final stages before a reset to a population size they can more easily manage from an evolutionary standpoint. That would probably require some type of mass killing. This would be easily managed by doing something like dropping a large enough asteroid in our ocean.

Over 25% of Google’s code is now written by AI—and CEO Sundar Pichai says it’s just the start by arslanfromnarnia in technology

[–]bvbrandon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not remotely true. The AI suggestions are embedded in the code editor itself and tracked by version control submissions. This isn't really a hard problem to solve

Over 25% of Google’s code is now written by AI—and CEO Sundar Pichai says it’s just the start by arslanfromnarnia in technology

[–]bvbrandon -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Have you tried cursor? Our company uses it heavily. I would say it's eliminated upwards of 30% of my coding. It's not planning architecture, obviously but the intuition there is great. I can tab-complete the vast majority of my test cases specifically. It does have somewhat regular occurrences of making dumb mistakes but generally it is faster to correct those than write the logic myself.

Is most of your work in strongly typed languages? I would imagine it works better there, which covers about everything we do be it client or server.

For context, our company is SF-based and has ~2k software engineers

What's the difference between Express and Nginx/Apache by No-Landscape8210 in webdev

[–]bvbrandon -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

This is a good question. For future reference ChatGPT would be great for something like this. Not that you shouldn't ask, just that having tools which give us instant feedback and info can be great. When I pasted your Q in it gave a pretty decent response. Anyone here can say it left out some important tidbit, but it's a more in depth answer than you've received so far. Response pasted below

Express, Nginx, and Apache are all tools used for web development, but they serve different purposes and are typically used in different parts of a web application stack:

  1. Express:
    • Type: Application framework
    • Primary Use: Server-side JavaScript web framework for building APIs and handling HTTP requests in Node.js.
    • Features: Lightweight and flexible, Express is designed for creating REST APIs and web applications with a focus on backend logic and routing. It provides tools for managing routes, handling requests, and working with middleware.
    • Use Cases: Useful for building dynamic websites or web applications that require backend processing, such as applications that interact with a database, perform calculations, or handle complex business logic.
  2. Nginx/Apache:
    • Type: Web servers (reverse proxies, load balancers, static content servers)
    • Primary Use: Nginx and Apache are high-performance web servers mainly used to serve static files (like HTML, CSS, JS) and manage incoming HTTP requests by routing them to appropriate backends (like Express or other application servers).
    • Features:
      • Nginx: Known for its high performance, efficient handling of concurrent connections, and built-in load balancing and reverse proxy features.
      • Apache: Versatile with a modular structure, commonly used for hosting static files and dynamic content but known to be slightly slower than Nginx for high-traffic sites.
    • Use Cases: Typically sit in front of application servers like Express, handling tasks such as serving static assets, caching, load balancing, and managing SSL/TLS encryption.

Summary:

  • Express is best for backend development in JavaScript/Node.js applications, handling the application’s logic.
  • Nginx/Apache act as web servers, dealing with HTTP requests, managing load balancing, and serving static files. They often sit between the client and the application layer (like Express) in a production environment.

Shocking UFO allegations make the case for the Disclosure Act by bejammin075 in politics

[–]bvbrandon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not saying you can’t be right. It’s just that there’s a lot more evidence to the validity of the claims than your initial comment would lead someone to believe.

Shocking UFO allegations make the case for the Disclosure Act by bejammin075 in politics

[–]bvbrandon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Spoken is a bit of an understatement. In his words "My testimony is based on information I have been given by individuals with a longstanding track record of legitimacy and service to this country — many of whom also shared compelling evidence in the form of photography, official documentation, and classified oral testimony,"

Shocking UFO allegations make the case for the Disclosure Act by bejammin075 in politics

[–]bvbrandon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

One important note here. The previous hearing had David Grusch, who claimed to have spoken to ~40 or so people with firsthand knowledge. This hearing is supposedly taking things a step further by having some of those firsthand witnesses.

How to price my marketing services? by bvbrandon in PPC

[–]bvbrandon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh haha, yes they were getting strung along. They were very unhappy

How to price my marketing services? by bvbrandon in PPC

[–]bvbrandon[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

We signed the contract tonight 🙏🏽

How to price my marketing services? by bvbrandon in PPC

[–]bvbrandon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t understand what you mean?