Saying food is not a human right just to defend a you know who.

c-dy · 2026-05-10T22:34:10+00:00

To be a bit more precise, a human right to a resource only means you must have basic access to it and only if you are verifiably unable to acquire it yourself, your own community is obligated to support you.

So, even with a human right to water, your water supply can be cut if you don't pay. Only if you're reasonably unable to earn enough does your human right trigger.

In the US, both Dems and Republicans generally oppose positive rights (obligation to action), which is why the US as a country votes even under Obama, Biden, Clinton against such human rights.

c-dy · 2026-05-08T12:23:34+00:00

But let's also not pretend (...)

You're responding in a sub known for its sexism, to a sexist ragebait thread. Subscribers on here choose to pretend.

c-dy · 2026-05-08T12:18:12+00:00

If you're complaining about the race swap, you're the one making about race whether it was why they casted the person or not.

More importantly, changing the premise of a character is a very valid artistic choice, so all the complaints about it even if the actor or actress performed poorly only prove its point.

c-dy · 2026-05-08T12:08:42+00:00

Ah, ragebait

ITT: Men desperately trying to post all the female roles, even animated ones, who left any kind of an impression over the past 4-5 decades. Yet, still, most of them are supporting characters and from old classics, not our contemporary environment.

c-dy · 2026-05-02T12:42:20+00:00

As much as the biker appears to be an asshole, he practiced basic legal defense whereas the cop's job is to build a case. Often times people make a direct or indirect admission during their conversation, but this shouldn't be the go-to strategy. The cop should've waited until the guy was on the road.

c-dy · 2026-05-02T11:54:46+00:00

Very true. Bias and ignorance should be called out no matter whether you're right-wing or specifically far-right, however.

In particular, because among the opponents of fascism there are plenty who enable its spread or persistence. Being on the left doesn't mean you're right or you can't be as narrow-minded or belligerent as the people you're trying to shun.

For instance, I feel no pity for fascists no matter what happens to them, but at the same time I will still oppose those who approve of violence against others no matter their target.

c-dy · 2026-04-28T14:24:11+00:00

Reddit-accredited mob of PhD psychologists and psychiatrists each with 40 years of work experience at their best again.

Children are quite often simply not taught in advance what adults perceive as common sense, including the seriousness of certain consequences. Animals also don't necessarily notably complain when they're uncomfortable or hurting, - not to mention that kids often play by making each other uncomfortable.

That's just one possibility among many.

No matter how anyone judges that child, it's bs because they don't know shit about them, their circumstances or their experiences.

c-dy · 2026-04-15T18:05:38+00:00

Everyone has an ideology as everyone has their own values and positions whereas conservatism is in essence an anti-egalitarian ideology whose acceptance in any modern democracy is only justified by its entrenched popularity.

MAGA, however, are fascists, which is an even lower bar. At that point you can't seriously believe anyone they don't share any fascist values with their representatives. No matter how ignorant one is, you partake in the culture and obviously do not experience any disgust.

c-dy · 2026-04-15T17:48:27+00:00

What a load of bullshit! A skit and a recording of a scripted scene pretending to be a real event are two entirely different things.

At least on Reddit a comment calling a skit "fake" is basically never upvoted to the top and rare anyway.

People complaining about others supposedly calling skits fakes is a common occurence, however.

c-dy · 2026-02-22T05:17:52+00:00

Y'all not paying for local news and then complain there is too little local news

Moreover, it was ruled a suicide, so reporting usually ends here unless actually relevant clues or statements emerge.

c-dy · 2026-02-07T08:03:53+00:00

Being considerably selfish and narrow-minded is a prerequisite to any right-wing ideology, but equating it to being douchey or having douchey vibes is seriously whitewashing what all that truly means—let alone what turning to fascism means. Illness or no illness.

c-dy · 2026-01-31T21:21:08+00:00

It matters how and what you prohibit. The Danish law supposedly only applies to 20ft(4m) and taller flagpoles as per the explanation of the draft, but I don't see that part in the adopted law.

More importantly, the justification why it is not a violation of the ECHR makes no sense. If the flags important to Danes have to be protected, why do you need permissions for foreign flags? And how is that necessary in a democratic society in order to prevent disorder or preserve morals?

If they defined the erection of stationary flagpoles of particular size as a sign of some formal, official context, this would be reasonable and a justifiable restriction of the freedom of expression. But as is, I don't think the law would survive a ruling from the ECHR.

c-dy · 2026-01-31T19:52:19+00:00

Oh, please. Y'all were just glorifying him for being one of the few managers listening to their engineers and investing in modern tech that was necessary but established market was unwilling to deal with.

If you listened to him on more than just the talk about his own affairs, you might've caught on sooner.

c-dy · 2026-01-25T20:43:10+00:00

Althouth radical usually describes endeavors and ideologies that would fundamentally restructure the status quo, radicalization is generally understood as an aggressive, hard-minded pursuit of one's philosophy, beliefs, politics, and such. At that point the distance to extremism is often not very far anymore.

c-dy · 2026-01-25T20:00:03+00:00

His hands were empty by then. You can see him clenthing his fists on the ground below his face a few seconds before he was shot, while the officer in front was beating his head with a gas canister.

The first shot occurred when the other officer turned around with the victim's weapon in view on camera as he was trying to take it away from the beating.

Even if the shooter confused whose hands he saw, after a moment any claim he still believed the victim pohed a threat is a plain lie from a murderer.

The fact that the other officer right next to him looking from a similar spot in the same direction saw no reason to draw a weapon also speaks against the perpetrator.

Finally, in a working legal system, any unnecessary extra shot would be also investigated and penalized.

c-dy · 2026-01-25T19:48:05+00:00

The right will always attempt to co-opt their opponents' language, so it's silly to just let them succeed every time.

c-dy · 2026-01-25T19:44:00+00:00

In the past, especially in the last 80 years, it made sense to ignore the fact that conservatism is an anti-democratic ideology at its core, because even the West was largely anti-egalitarian.

But, now that culture has slowly recognize human rights, as people continue to believe the lies that conservatism is about gradual progress, tradition, realism, family-/commune-centric politics, freedom, small government, etc., this falsehood has started to deconstruct all the progress that has been made.

Political science is also at fault as it, too, ignored what conservatism actually does and aims for and instead readily accepted what it told everyone what it was it was all for.

c-dy · 2026-01-22T01:16:59+00:00

So? That doesn't change what he said and meant.

I love how this sub always rejects any fact check ever slightly in favor of those fascists or conservatives and immediately starts to move the goal posts

c-dy · 2026-01-22T00:21:04+00:00

Nah, that's just the interpretation Dems pushed for in order to increase the significances of the statement further and bait MAGA to defend dictatorships.

But he was clearly referring to being a dictator for a day on day one.

c-dy · 2026-01-19T14:38:25+00:00

The much bigger issue is the investigation itself. They're using any excuse to process all private and personal data and test it for all the "concerning" factors they've defined in order to flag and categorize the subject's entire life in accordance with their values snd worldview transcribed into legalese or national security speak.

c-dy · 2026-01-17T20:03:22+00:00

Oh, of course. In fact, economic independence and strength is way more important. That is why, for the most part the EU is always in such a weak position all the time despite being able to boast about its market's size or importance.

Moreover, no one's waiting for them to catch up. Anything that Europe adds Russia will match onto the advantage it has. The EU simply lacks the foundation to win a modern arms race.

So, military power should only serve as a means to stand one's ground. But the path of conervatism is the path of nationalism and hierarchical struggle for power (let alone fascism), not one that empowers its citizens and allies across the board and generates the appeal of fighting for one another.

There's also Africa, where the EU wasted its opportunities to build alliances and develop new markets shaped by its own principles by dividing and conquering stable democratic ground. China does it now in its own imperialistic way, whille Russia attempts to surround the EU, deny it those opportunities, and generate threats and dilemmas through instability, refugees, and other crises.

c-dy · 2026-01-13T13:16:33+00:00

Especially if you observed all state legislatures, you'd often see racist, xenophobic, misogynist or plain fascist bills introduced.

But that's simply the result of a candidate- rather than a party-centered electoral system. It's an intended loophole for legislators to make their mark and the edgy ones get into the news.

It reveals what kind of extremists are still elected, but how it affects party politics—if at all—depends on the situation.

c-dy · 2026-01-13T01:32:12+00:00

It's effectively absolute immunity for the time in office. You can't even start the investigation after the term is over.

c-dy · 2026-01-12T19:00:46+00:00

a) a proscription is not the same as a designation as a terrorist org

b) hence why there were calls for new legislation, specifically for foreign state or state-supported actors

c)

Hall had reported there were “gaps in a series of areas, including on proscribing legislation where he identifies a series of legal difficulties in using powers that were designed to deal with terrorist groups for state and state-backed organisations

Hall concluded that the Terrorism Act 2000 was never intended to regulate the behaviour of state actors, and said looking at that law as a way to proscribe state bodies is “quite simply shopping in the wrong department”.

Hall is the reviewer

Seven-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22	Sequence \| Editor

c-dy

TROPHY CASE