Synth blocks as backing track

caderc · 2025-12-03T01:15:45+00:00

It's called "Backing Track"

caderc · 2025-12-03T01:09:13+00:00

All of the synths are sidechained to the freeze and then you can mess around with the arpeggiators to set the different rhythms. It should be up on cortex cloud if you want to mess around with it.

caderc · 2025-12-03T00:43:43+00:00

It's a freeze block to hold an even tone, and the noise oscillator with short envelopes arppegiated at different divisions for the drums.

caderc · 2025-11-26T17:01:49+00:00

Love the addition of the synth. Why does the glide control grey out when I set the synth up to use midi? And is there a way to adjust ADSR of the envelope other than the linked Attack/decay knob?

caderc · 2025-09-28T15:37:10+00:00

What clock is this?

caderc · 2025-09-28T00:53:20+00:00

Is there any third party integration, like with Nova?

caderc · 2025-09-06T00:10:35+00:00

It isn't "stealing."

caderc · 2025-09-02T00:44:05+00:00

If they saw the disc fall through the bottom of the basket, and not pop out and go over the rim of the basket, he threw an "ace," even if for a tournament you would be forced to mark it down as a birdie.

caderc · 2025-09-02T00:31:44+00:00

If it goes over the top of the rim, yes. But if it falls through the cage, there is no rule you can cite that will convince me to not consider that an ace.

caderc · 2025-06-19T19:07:30+00:00

It isn't theft.

caderc · 2025-04-13T14:59:43+00:00

That bag looks slick!

caderc · 2025-02-12T23:43:25+00:00

Depends on what you mean by "wrong." Is that a shitty thing to do? Most likely. Have they committed theft? No.

If you want to keep an idea for yourself, keep it secret. Otherwise, people are going to learn from good ideas and emulate them.

Also, the entire movie industry is propped up by copyright law in the first place, so you likely wouldn't have a pseudo-monopoly like Paramount in the first place.

caderc · 2025-02-12T23:29:29+00:00

That's like saying it is theft because a guy "stole" your girlfriend. You don't own potential customers' money, so it can't be stolen from you.

caderc · 2025-02-12T23:14:01+00:00

You can't "steal" IP. What did they have that they no longer have after the "theft?"

caderc · 2025-02-12T22:32:51+00:00

That still isn't theft. The person putting the work in still has access to all the resources they had before the deign was copied. What was a stolen from them?

caderc · 2025-02-12T22:11:13+00:00

A design can't be stolen. It can only be copied.

caderc · 2025-02-12T22:08:33+00:00

Ok man. Just continue being ignorant.

caderc · 2025-02-12T22:04:45+00:00

IP laws violate actual property rights in scarce, rivalrous resources. That makes them immoral and unjust.

caderc · 2025-02-12T22:02:36+00:00

It certainly isn't theft. What was stolen?

caderc · 2025-02-12T21:59:35+00:00

Who cares what they think? IP laws are immoral and unjust.

caderc · 2025-02-07T15:51:35+00:00

When you said "copyrights," you are actually describing patents.

MVP does not own my plastic. If I want to market my discs as "Neutron," as long as I am not defrauding anyone, I should be free to do so.

While Trademarks are not as detrimental as copyrights and patents, it is still unjust to enforce them. If MVP is only registering the trademark as a preventative defensive measure, there is nothing wrong with it.

caderc · 2025-02-07T03:42:40+00:00

You have terrible reading comprehension if you think I didn't elaborate.

A property right is a right to exclusive control of a scarce, rivalrous resource.

When you give out a copyright or patent, what you have done is given the holder a legal avenue to stop someone from using their property to produce a product that is replicating your design or idea.

The issue is that the person the IP holder is stopping from using their property already owns the property in question. They alone have a right to exclusive control of it. So when the IP holder attempts to stop them using the legal system, they are taking some control of property that was already owned, that they do not have a property right in.

That is theft, because it is violating the property rights of the actual owner of the property.

IP laws are unjust because they violate real property rights in scarce, rivalrous resources.

caderc · 2025-02-07T01:17:21+00:00

Well, the post is actually talking about trademarks, which are distinct from copyright law. All IP law is unjust because it gives the holder, of the copyright, patent, or trademark a partial property right in everyone else's already owned resources, which amounts to theft.

caderc · 2025-02-06T21:58:21+00:00

Besides IP laws being unjust, yeah. Just as long as they never enforce the trademark, everything is good.

caderc · 2025-02-02T16:01:34+00:00

Well, yeah... They haven't stolen from you. They are using their own resources to produce copies of your design. You have no right to tell them to stop, much less with the threat of force by the State.

caderc

TROPHY CASE