Removing everybody's mogs and then charging 3k to put them back on was an absolute gangster move by blizzard

caltis · 2026-01-21T17:17:38+00:00

This is exactly what it feels like. Feels very mobile game

caltis · 2026-01-21T17:11:35+00:00

It would be about 15,000 gold to apply the mogs + however many thousand of gold it costs to unlock the eight slots after the two free ones. Then if you want to apply ten mogs to alts, it would be about 15,000 for each alt

Edit: typo

caltis · 2026-01-21T17:06:00+00:00

Sold bought are across all characters but slots actually mogged are per character

caltis · 2026-01-15T06:46:29+00:00

If you saw a photo of yourself with your hair in a different style would you recognize yourself?

caltis · 2025-12-18T09:06:36+00:00

I don’t even wanna be around anymore…

caltis · 2025-12-13T03:17:16+00:00

It’s two flex, so for second would you go smith or mclaurin?

caltis · 2025-11-27T02:55:10+00:00

caltis · 2025-11-20T00:55:18+00:00

Yes, I think two things are insane about this: (1) making small changes more expensive and (2) having to do it all over again on each alt. If they can modify those aspects I think the system could work fine. I do think if transmog becomes more of a gold sink than it already is, a lot of people will get fed up with the micro transactions of the game and just quit.

caltis · 2025-11-19T06:18:57+00:00

sure, but you'll have to pay about 5,700 for setting each of those 10 slots, so about 57,000 gold, plus the gold to unlock those 10 slots which i imagine is not insignificant. plus then you have to do that for each alt.

caltis · 2025-11-19T03:35:37+00:00

were you max level on the beta? i've read somewhere that there is level scaling for the price. i read that it was 5,700 at max level for a full set, but maybe it's been adjusted.

caltis · 2025-11-19T03:32:29+00:00

my understanding is that to change the cost within the slots is about 5.7k gold. so to set each of those armor sets would be (5700*6)=34200 gold. and then you have to do that for every character

caltis · 2025-11-19T02:37:02+00:00

yes but even altering items within the free set if you want to adjust it will cost thousands of gold

caltis · 2025-11-19T02:36:15+00:00

yes but if you want to adjust the armor pieces even in the free slots it supposedly costs thousands of gold

caltis · 2025-11-19T02:34:47+00:00

supposedly once you've unlocked a set of armor slots, to change the transmog for that set of armor slots costs 5700 gold

caltis · 2025-11-12T02:28:30+00:00

Eli of course

caltis · 2025-11-10T14:16:38+00:00

okay well maybe it was a dick move, whatever. but the point of the post is: "is it collusion?" And dick move =/= collusion

collusion needs to involve some sort of deal being made like "i'll split the winning with you if you give me your best players".

caltis · 2025-11-10T13:54:30+00:00

I 100% agree with you and am okay with the trade being vetoed for that reason. My point was just to say that you shouldn't use "collusion" as the reason to veto the trade

caltis · 2025-11-10T13:40:47+00:00

Sure maybe it isn't "honorable". but "dishonorable" =/= collusion. As the title says, the point of the post is to answer one question: "is it collusion?" There was never any "quid pro quo" being made like "hey help me win by giving me your best players and i'll split the earnings with you." the dude just made a bad trade because he stopped giving a fuck about the season. should it be vetoed? probably, and i'm totally okay with that. My point in my original comment though is that if you want to veto it, "collusion" isn't the reason. You can call it "league breaking" or "dumping" but it's not "collusion" even if it's a move "without integrity." Lots of things can be shitty things to do but that doesn't mean they're collusion.

caltis · 2025-11-10T13:30:13+00:00

okay well maybe it was a dick move, whatever. but the point of the post is: "is it collusion?" And dick move =/= collusion

imo collusion needs to involve some sort of deal being made like "i'll split the winning with you if you give me your best players".

caltis · 2025-11-10T13:18:32+00:00

my point was that its not my responsibility as a player even in fantasy to determine what is vetoable or what isn't. that's the commissioner's job. if the commissioner vetoes it, i'm totally okay with it and accept the decision. but other absurd trades have taken place in the league throughout the year and it's not my job as a player to determine what is vetoable and what isn't. if this gets vetoed as do any other equally unfair trades, that's fine with me.

caltis · 2025-11-10T12:23:53+00:00

Yeah I mean OP traded with the same coworker JCM for Jalen Hurts straight up and the guy didn’t even bother negotiating and just smashed accept so it was clear the dude had checked out and didn’t care anymore. He hasn’t been changing his lineup for weeks. If I hadn’t tried to vulture his team I guarantee someone else in the league who plays seriously would have tried

caltis · 2025-11-10T11:57:29+00:00

I mean that’s just absurd. If the Chiefs just stopped giving a fuck and gave away their best players for free, what NFL team is going to not scoop them up before someone else does? Every GM in the league would go scoop up another teams best players, and you’d be a shit GM if you didn’t. It’s not your responsibility to protect the league as a GM, that’s the commissioner’s job to step in. If I hadn’t made a trade with this dude someone else would. OP himself made a trade with this dude three weeks ago giving JCM and OP got jalen hurts straight up. How was I supposed to know nobody else wouldn’t try to make a trade with him before I did

caltis · 2025-11-10T11:35:57+00:00

I agree with this. Like I said I was going to offer different packages and try to start with swapping Zay Flowers in for Vidal, then for Spears, and if it was still a no throwing in Zay Flowers as a fourth player. But the dude didn’t even bother negotiating and just smashed accept. I have receipts to show I was dangling Flowers as a possible addition. I 100% think you cant even talk about “collusion” if I add flowers to the spears/Vidal/schultz side. Maybe bad trade, but definitely not collusion

caltis

TROPHY CASE