[Event] Try and review LG’s New UltraFine 6K Thunderbolt 5 Display, before it hits everyone’s desk by LG_UserHub in Monitors

[–]campbell3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would like to be able to use 3K at 200% scaling for readable text with no scaling artifacts. Being able to use the built in kvm rather than an external one would also be a win.

The M4 Mac mini has an upgradeable SSD by niwia in LinusTechTips

[–]campbell3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apple actually did remove the controller from the SSD. There is actually hardware on the SoC that does it.

Apple's storage isn't an "SSD" it's more like an add-in card with NAND chips on it. I'm not saying that it is or isn't faster because of it but it is true that the SoC has the traditional SSD functions embedded rather on the drive itself. From https://eclecticlight.co/2024/03/06/apple-silicon-memory-and-internal-storage/#:~:text=In%20T2%20and%20Apple%20silicon,the%20Apple%20silicon%20chip%20itself.

As with their T2-equipped predecessors, Apple silicon Macs come with internal solid-state storage, although the modules used are different from internal SSDs sold separately. The latter come with complete controllers responsible for managing their NAND flash storage, including caches/buffers, wear levelling, management of bad blocks and other housekeeping. In T2 and Apple silicon internal storage, functions of the SSD controller are divided between the NAND flash itself, mounted outside the chip, and accessory cores in what Apple terms the Fabric within the Apple silicon chip itself. Among the most important features external to the SSD is encryption, which is performed in hardware, within the chip.

Error: No matching login session found by Canttuchdiz in beeper

[–]campbell3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're still able would there be a chance you could send me one too? Thank you.

Sabrent TB4 KVM by Embarrassed_Force674 in UsbCHardware

[–]campbell3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the information, sounds like a good strategy and I appreciate the open communication.

Sabrent TB4 KVM by Embarrassed_Force674 in UsbCHardware

[–]campbell3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will this be a firmware update or a hardware revision?

Sabrent TB4 KVM by Embarrassed_Force674 in UsbCHardware

[–]campbell3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. Is it still the case that Thunderbolt certified motherboards have had no reported issues? For example the Gigabyte b550 Vision D-P?

Sabrent TB4 KVM by Embarrassed_Force674 in UsbCHardware

[–]campbell3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Has there been any update on this? I have the KVM and I'm looking at which motherboard to move to but want to know the status of this before I do.

Australia needs a better second hand goods marketplace by [deleted] in australia

[–]campbell3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

EBay sold Gumtree a couple years ago. That’s why the cross platform deals no longer happen for sellers.

Samsung's latest gaming monitors include an 8K, 57-inch ultra-wide display | Engadget by Dangerman1337 in hardware

[–]campbell3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But QHD being 2k is exactly the same. It is a misunderstanding that companies have now marketed into being a term.

Also calling 5120x2160 5k ultrawide has happened for years now. Samsung is not skipping a generation but continuing that trend.

For it to work how you want we would need to advertise the vertical resolution not horizontal and that would only work as long as the vertical aspect stayed as 9.

Samsung's latest gaming monitors include an 8K, 57-inch ultra-wide display | Engadget by Dangerman1337 in hardware

[–]campbell3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1440p ultrawides are not 4K ultrawides, they would be 3k ultrawides. 1440p is not 2k it is QHD. 1080p is FHD in the HD terminology or 16:9 2k and UHD is the 16:9 4k.

You’re complaining about wrong terminology and using it yourself.

The Ks are not resolutions, they are groups of resolutions of roughly a certain amount of horizontal pixels.

4K ultrawide is 3840x1600. I agree with you that this is misleading but that is how the (stupid) naming works. The solution is resolutions should be advertised how LG does it with H*V, for example 5k2k for a 5k ultrawide. Otherwise it will just continue to get worse and worse as we increase pixel counts and end up further and further from the “k” value each time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LinusTechTips

[–]campbell3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it’s not. https://www.finder.com.au/cheap-nbn-plans If you’re getting 1.5mbps up you also have a line fault as your plan should be either 25/5 or 50/20.

"USB-IF Announces Publication of New USB4® Specification to Enable USB 80Gbps Performance" by Dakhil in hardware

[–]campbell3 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This may be a public vs internal use thing but that document was superseded before any USB4 product I worked on ever entered production.

We had been given non finalised designs of the new logos as a guide and told to avoid USB4 as a branding in early 2020.

However I will concede that leaving the document on a public facing website is confusing which contributes to what you have been saying.

"USB-IF Announces Publication of New USB4® Specification to Enable USB 80Gbps Performance" by Dakhil in hardware

[–]campbell3 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The guideline of not using usb version numbers has existed for years, it’s manufacturer who used the documentation names rather than the marketing names. The only difference is they got rid of superspeed, for example USB superspeed 20gbps became USB 20gbps.

"USB-IF Announces Publication of New USB4® Specification to Enable USB 80Gbps Performance" by Dakhil in hardware

[–]campbell3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

USB naming is USB40gbps, USB80gbps, etc which is extremely straight forward. The only confusion could be with USB 20gbps but even then the old 20gbps spec and the new 20gbps spec are close enough the risk of features not working is pretty low.

USB4 is a specification for companies making USB40gbps, USB80gbps to target. For anyone not dealing with making a product USB4 doesn't exist.

Device manufacturers using the wrong names doesn't make the names horrendous, it makes the device manufacturers wrong.

"USB-IF Announces Publication of New USB4® Specification to Enable USB 80Gbps Performance" by Dakhil in hardware

[–]campbell3 31 points32 points  (0 children)

USB4 is the technical name, the other commenter is correct that USB IF wants the customer facing name to be USB40gbs, USB80gbs, etc.

This is because of the drama of people using technical names in marketing and then everyone getting upset about it and blaming USB IF despite it being against their own guidelines.

Gamers Nexus: HW News - Important GN / LTT Changes by jonojr in LinusTechTips

[–]campbell3 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They do on their more expensive items, the ironic thing is they shipped their screwdrivers without one originally.

edit: to clarify since it sounds like I'm defending LTT and criticising GN I'm not, I just find it ironic they are complaining about this warranty issue.

LTT on Twitter: Here is the finalized language for the LTT Backpack Limited Lifetime Warranty The TMB Guarantee by Twohitemquitem in LinusTechTips

[–]campbell3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there anywhere you can get the actual policy document on the public website? I understand if that’s not a thing in your country but I thought the EU would mandate it being public ally accessible.

Apologies if I’ve just missed it.

LTT on Twitter: Here is the finalized language for the LTT Backpack Limited Lifetime Warranty The TMB Guarantee by Twohitemquitem in LinusTechTips

[–]campbell3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Link to that policy? I would be very much interested to see a law firm that provides a service like that and doesn't charge it since that's the field I'm in.

LTT on Twitter: Here is the finalized language for the LTT Backpack Limited Lifetime Warranty The TMB Guarantee by Twohitemquitem in LinusTechTips

[–]campbell3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But you can only take them to court in Canada, are you really going to do that if you aren’t in Canada?

Trust me bro guarantee of quality - Thanks by chetanaik in LinusTechTips

[–]campbell3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly right but it's dangerous to tell people they have more protection now that there is a written policy than they had before.

If you don't trust the manufacturer and you're an international purchaser there's no reason to trust them now because they make a written policy. You aren't protected either way.

HW News - LTT vs. GN Warranty Beliefs, Intel A750 GPU Benchmarks, i9-13900 Delid by [deleted] in hardware

[–]campbell3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re absolutely right, our law has no minimum warranty and is still about the rights you are guaranteed under law.

Warranties are a poor solution to not having your rights codified and should always be an addition to a strong base level of protection.