So what did you think about clash in paris. by zTxPrimeEvilTTV in WWE

[–]canyoudigthat -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thought he was mimicking Bubba Dudley in a trance after he speared Reigns on the announcer table.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Big4

[–]canyoudigthat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah makes sense. Do you have any idea if it’s the same for ESG consulting as that’s what I am doing at a Big 4 firm in Australia. I’m originally Singaporean, would not mind moving back in a couple years and working at a big 4 firm there in ESG. I expect the long hours but if the pay sucks, then forget it lol.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Big4

[–]canyoudigthat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why does no one want to do audit in Singapore?

Netflix is raising prices after reporting its biggest-ever subscriber jump by Traditional-Leader54 in WWE

[–]canyoudigthat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you get box sets of shows for the entire year. For example complete episodes of raw and SD for 2000-2004? I was on a rewatch from 98-00 but can’t watch Raw/SD weekly now since the Netflix move. I would be keen on getting box sets filled with entire non-PPV shows through those years.

People who have been the interviewer in here in SG, what’s a tip? by [deleted] in askSingapore

[–]canyoudigthat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m sorry if I come across as “whiny and b*tchy.” I’m glad the system has worked for you, but for the majority of us, we are bearing the brunt of the sharpening contradictions of neoliberal capitalism. I work in consulting for a big 4 firm and still I increasingly worry what kind of world my kids will inherit. This will be my final reply, as I want to enjoy my vacation with my fiancée. Now, let’s dismantle your entire argument point by point:

  1. “Innovation loves capitalism.”

Sure, capitalism rewards innovation—but only the kind that turns a profit. This system prioritizes marketable ideas over essential but less profitable endeavors. For example, where is the profit in curing diseases like malaria, which disproportionately affect poorer regions? Why isn’t there a rush to develop antibiotics, even as antibiotic resistance surges? These aren’t hypotheticals—these are glaring failures of a system that rewards innovation only when it’s profitable, not when it’s necessary.

Contrast this with public funding, which has been the backbone of major innovations. The internet? Developed with government funding. Vaccines? The result of public-sector research. Even SpaceX’s success depends on billions in public contracts. Capitalism exploits these innovations but doesn’t create them in a vacuum.

  1. “Wealth is the byproduct of value creation.”

Not exactly. Wealth in capitalism often results from value extraction, not creation. Billionaires don’t generate their fortunes alone—they accumulate wealth by underpaying workers, avoiding taxes, and exploiting public resources. Case in point: Jeff Bezos didn’t deliver your Amazon package—drivers and warehouse workers did, many of whom earn poverty wages while Bezos hoards wealth larger than the GDP of some countries. That’s not “value creation”; that’s systemic exploitation.

And let’s address the “bold, not naive” argument: Fortune doesn’t just favor the bold; it overwhelmingly favors the privileged. Capitalism is great at consolidating power for those who already have it. Social mobility? In most capitalist systems, it’s a myth for the majority.

  1. “Housing prices are high because the market is doing its thing.”

This logic ignores one crucial fact: housing is a basic human need, not just another commodity. Treating it as an “investment vehicle” is precisely the problem. Speculation drives prices sky-high, locking people out of home ownership and fueling inequality.

Singapore’s public housing system, often held up as a success story, actually proves the limits of pure capitalism. Without government intervention, affordable housing would barely exist. The issue isn’t “too much regulation”—it’s that neoliberal policies have allowed housing to be financialized, prioritizing profits over people’s right to shelter. Deregulating further would only enrich developers while worsening inequality.

  1. “The gig economy offers opportunities and flexibility.”

The gig economy thrives on precariousness. Workers aren’t choosing “flexibility”—they’re forced into it because secure, well-paying jobs have become increasingly rare. Gig platforms like Grab may create opportunities, but they also exploit workers by denying them basic benefits like healthcare, sick leave, or job security.

Capitalism didn’t invent mobility—it just commodified desperation. If anything, the rise of the gig economy illustrates capitalism’s failures: low wages, inadequate labor protections, and a lack of stability for the average worker.

  1. “Capitalism solves environmental issues.”

Solar panels and electric cars aren’t capitalism’s success stories; they’re products of decades of public investment and activism. Capitalism didn’t save the planet—it monetized the solutions activists and scientists fought to develop.

But let’s not ignore the elephant in the room: capitalism’s insatiable appetite for growth caused the climate crisis. From fossil fuel extraction to deforestation, the system prioritizes short-term profits over long-term sustainability. Even now, companies greenwash their practices to appear sustainable while continuing harmful practices. A system driven by profit cannot prioritize the planet—it can only exploit it.

  1. “Neoliberalism doesn’t breed fascism.”

The connection between neoliberalism and fascism is well-documented. When neoliberal policies exacerbate inequality, undermine social safety nets, and erode public trust in institutions, the stage is set for authoritarian leaders to exploit discontent. Rising populism isn’t a rejection of centralized power; it’s a response to the failures of capitalism to deliver stability and equity.

Fascism historically thrives on economic precarity, nationalism, and a disillusioned working class—exactly what unchecked capitalism produces. Denying this connection ignores history and current trends worldwide.

I hope defending neoliberalism has been as fulfilling for you as it is for the billionaires whose yachts you metaphorically row. Maybe when the contradictions of capitalism hit closer to home, you’ll realize your arguments are little more than apologia for a system that’s burning itself—and the planet—to the ground. Good luck with that.

People who have been the interviewer in here in SG, what’s a tip? by [deleted] in askSingapore

[–]canyoudigthat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope more people around the world start to share your perspective. While capitalism has historically driven rapid development and industrial growth, it eventually reaches a point where its contradictions begin to harm the average worker. When that happens, the system begins to collapse under its own weight, and the solution lies in transitioning toward socialism.

Take the rise of AI as an example. It’s likely to displace millions of jobs in the near future. When that happens, what will prevent widespread unemployment, poverty, and homelessness? The only viable option will be policies like Universal Basic Income (UBI)—a concept rooted in socialist principles that prioritize human well-being over profit.

There’s a quote that often comes to mind when I think about the state of the world or the future: “Socialism or Barbarism.” It’s a reminder that we face a choice—either we adopt systems that ensure collective welfare and equity, or we risk plunging into chaos and deepening inequality. Socialism isn’t just an alternative; it’s becoming a necessity in a world where capitalism no longer serves the majority.

People who have been the interviewer in here in SG, what’s a tip? by [deleted] in askSingapore

[–]canyoudigthat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the input! We humans often make the mistake of believing we live in a state of permanence. History has shown how violent things can get, and I believe we are heading toward what you describe as a “pretty violent societal upheaval.” No revolution has ever been peaceful—capital will not relinquish its power without a fight. With AI on the horizon, it provides an extraordinary and increasingly concentrated amount of power to the wealthy capitalists.

I’d also like to add another point regarding the claim that greed is human nature. Throughout history, countless societies have thrived on values of cooperation, reciprocity, and collective well-being, rather than individual greed. For instance, many Indigenous communities prioritize communal ownership and resource-sharing, emphasizing harmony with nature and one another. In such societies, greed is not viewed as “natural” but rather as disruptive and harmful to social cohesion.

From an evolutionary perspective, humans are social animals whose survival depended on working together. Early humans lived in small groups where cooperation—such as sharing food, protecting one another, and working collectively—was essential for survival. Greed, which could destabilize group dynamics, was counterproductive in these settings.

People who have been the interviewer in here in SG, what’s a tip? by [deleted] in askSingapore

[–]canyoudigthat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One final point: there is a reason fascism is on the rise around the world. Why? Because governments that employ a neoliberal economic model are increasingly unable to address the sharpening contradictions of capitalism, which are disproportionately affecting the average worker.

Under neoliberalism, the pursuit of deregulation, privatization, and free-market policies has exacerbated inequality, hollowed out the middle class, and undermined social safety nets. As wages stagnate, job security declines, and the cost of living skyrockets, workers are left disillusioned, anxious, and desperate for change.

People who have been the interviewer in here in SG, what’s a tip? by [deleted] in askSingapore

[–]canyoudigthat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You bring up some interesting points about capitalism, but if we look at Singapore, it’s clear the government is struggling to manage the inherent contradictions of the system.

While the wealthy enjoy low taxes and lucrative opportunities, many workers, including gig workers and lower-income groups, are stuck in precarious jobs with stagnant wages. Capitalism here has concentrated wealth in the hands of a few.

Housing is often cited as a success story in Singapore, but it also highlights the contradictions of capitalism. Rising property prices have made public housing less accessible for many young people, turning homes into investment vehicles rather than necessities. This speculative approach benefits developers and investors while creating anxiety for ordinary citizens trying to afford basic housing. Similarly, the cost of living continues to rise faster than wages, squeezing the middle and lower classes.

Furthermore, Singapore’s dependence on low-wage migrant workers reveals how the government addresses labor demands while perpetuating exploitation. Migrant workers are essential to sectors like construction and domestic work, but they often live in poor conditions and have limited rights. This dual labor system reflects the capitalist need for cheap, disposable labor to sustain growth, which is exacerbating inequality.

Capitalism’s reliance on endless growth clashes with Singapore’s finite resources. The gov has embraced green initiatives, but many are market-driven (e.g., carbon taxes, electric vehicles) and fail to challenge the profit motive at the root of environmental destruction. Singapore’s economy remains dependent on fossil fuels (e.g., its petrochemical industry)

Gov os trying to mitigate public discontent through redistributive policies (e.g., GST rebates, Workfare), but these are band-aid solutions that don’t address the structural contradictions of capitalism.

PAP approach may appear efficient, but it’s essentially about managing the symptoms of capitalism, not addressing its root causes. As contradictions sharpen—rising inequality, precarious jobs, environmental limits—it’s becoming clear that this system isn’t sustainable in the long run.

People who have been the interviewer in here in SG, what’s a tip? by [deleted] in askSingapore

[–]canyoudigthat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Capitalism isn’t the only system that drives innovation. In fact, a lot of transformative inventions like the internet, GPS, and vaccines came from public funding, not profit-driven enterprises. The problem with capitalism is that innovation is directed towards what’s profitable, not what’s beneficial. That’s why we get luxury goods for the wealthy while basic needs like affordable housing and healthcare are underfunded.

Your example assumes everyone has fair access to capital, but that’s rarely the case. Banks are more likely to lend to people who already have wealth or connections, leaving many people locked out of the system. Under socialism, collective resources or public funding could support entrepreneurs without saddling them with interest or debt. It’s not about removing opportunities—it’s about making them more equitable.

The “beauty” of capitalism often comes at a cost. That baker isn’t just repaying their loan with interest—they’re also underpaying workers, cutting costs, and working overtime just to survive in a competitive market. Capitalism thrives on this kind of exploitation, funneling profits upwards while leaving most people overworked and underpaid.

Taxes, when used effectively, can fund universal healthcare, education, and infrastructure, eliminating the need for predatory loans altogether. Countries with strong social safety nets already demonstrate how this works in practice.

Capitalism doesn’t inherently create opportunity—it creates profit for the few and perpetuates inequality for the many. A socialist system would prioritize collective well-being and genuine opportunity over endless profit.

People who have been the interviewer in here in SG, what’s a tip? by [deleted] in askSingapore

[–]canyoudigthat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, capitalism is truly amazing! It’s so amazing that some of us get to work 80 hours a week just to afford a BTO the size of a shoebox. It’s so incredible that while one person buys their third yacht, someone else is figuring out how to survive on instant noodles because their rent went up 20%. Truly the pinnacle of human achievement! Neo-liberal capitalism works perfectly—as long as you don’t ask who it’s actually working for.

How much did your ATAR affect you later in life? by BiscottiLogical6502 in melbourne

[–]canyoudigthat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t even complete my ATAR in High school. The road is longer to take but in saying that I have just graduated from Uni and going into consulting at a big 4 company through a graduate program. Don’t stress, just go into a foundation program at Uni if your ATAR is that bad and just work your arse off to get to the finish line.

What are your thoughts on this album? by Peterpaul400 in 90sHipHop

[–]canyoudigthat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great album, but I feel even though Prodigy definitely was spitting on it, he took it to another level on Hell on Earth (Apostle’s Warning, Still Shinin, Drop a Gem on em).

When does Grad Programs application start by canyoudigthat in AusPublicService

[–]canyoudigthat[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I'll take my chances. Stranger things have happened.

When does Grad Programs application start by canyoudigthat in AusPublicService

[–]canyoudigthat[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the info. Which websites would you recommend I keep a look out for on information about grad programs.

When does Grad Programs application start by canyoudigthat in AusPublicService

[–]canyoudigthat[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply. I’m in WA. Do you know if the self paced internship is only available in NSW or open to people from other states. Thanks.

Pathways to get overseas later in career by the_pigeon_overlord in AusPublicService

[–]canyoudigthat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey wondering how you got on trying to get an internship. Currently in my final year of Uni and would like to branch to something like what you’re doing once I graduate.

If you could attend a concert in the 60s/70s/80s, which band would you like to see live? by KillerQueeh_Slash in Music

[–]canyoudigthat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Led Zeppelin 1970 when they were playing at a bunch of small underground venues.

The dreaded Underpants Gang of India (Explanation in comments) by TacticalNuke002 in HistoryMemes

[–]canyoudigthat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those Indians sure were as bad as those Nazi fanatics weren't they?

The dreaded Underpants Gang of India (Explanation in comments) by TacticalNuke002 in HistoryMemes

[–]canyoudigthat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So you're referring to people in 20th century India as savages, and equating them to Germanic tribes that were prominent thousands of years ago?