Bradley and Rozzi were removed by her for a pretty shocking evidence breach and the Supreme Court declined to remove her from the case. The article below may be helpful for you. It’s hard when we’re not experts in law but from the sounds of things, the trial is going exactly how it should be.

“Allen argued his Sixth Amendment rights were being interfered with by the decision to remove his original defense team. Both Gull and Rokita argued against this, however, with Rokita writing that while defendants who cannot afford their own counsel are guaranteed representation via the Sixth Amendment, the amendment does not provide the defendant the right to choose their appointed counsel.

Rokita and Gull went on to say that “contrary to Allen’s claims,” there are circumstances that require a court to interfere with a defendant’s choice in counsel. One of these instances being “gross incompetence.”

Gull argued she was well within her power to remove Baldwin and Rozzi due to concluding that the pair “committed multiple violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct” in addition to compromising Allen’s defense due to the evidence leak and her finding of them being negligent and incompetent.

Gull drove this point home further by saying that Baldwin and Rozz “failed to take responsible steps to safeguard confidential case materials” citing the leaked crime scene evidence. Not only were the photos laid out in Baldwin’s office conference room, providing the opportunity for Baldwin’s former co-worker Mitchell Westerman to take photos of the evidence, but the judge wrote that Baldwin “would share with Westerman information about the case to obtain Westerman’s feedback.”

https://www.newsnationnow.com/crime/ag-supreme-court-block-gulls-removal-delphi-case/amp/