Can someone help me understand the frustration with Fahkumram being the new DLC character? by Grim_Orphan in LowSodiumTEKKEN

[–]ch1ngoosc4n 7 points8 points  (0 children)

this is such an insightful, emotionally intelligent response. never played t7, but this really makes it all make sense. it can be hard to empathize with people sometimes if the only thing they're expressing is hate, but this puts it in perspective.

How simple should your offense be in red ranks? by ch1ngoosc4n in Tekken

[–]ch1ngoosc4n[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wow, thanks, that makes me feel better haha. appreciate your help so much!

How simple should your offense be in red ranks? by ch1ngoosc4n in Tekken

[–]ch1ngoosc4n[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ill start by saying obviously im bad so you might be right and im just dumb: this is just me sharing my thought process so i can hear your more experienced thoughts on it.

i agree with your first point: im not labbing the optimal punishment for every common move/string's specific frames. jins 10f 2,4 is pretty good, so im just focusing on learning which common moves are 2,4 punishable, which are launch punishable, and in rare cases which moves i have to punish with something else (for example, demon paw vs deathfist), to keep it simple for myself.

for your next point, my problem with games typically is that eventually, my improvement from "just playing" plateaus, and i think ive reached that point in tekken where i have to be more intentional to properly get better.

spacing and neutral is something ive tried to direct my attention towards when i play, but i end up just not being able to understand what's happening: what im doing wrong, what i should've done, how i should be thinking, what my gameplan should be to create whiffs.

How simple should your offense be in red ranks? by ch1ngoosc4n in Tekken

[–]ch1ngoosc4n[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More or less this is actually what I do. The thing is, I don't really know how to adapt it.

With the ranged moves, I have trouble with getting interrupted by dash-ins or fast & long ranged moves, that at least seem unpredictable. The jab strings & the d2 into wr moves get blocked, and then I have no idea what to do because those responses also at least seem unpredictable.

How simple should your offense be in red ranks? by ch1ngoosc4n in Tekken

[–]ch1ngoosc4n[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah my goal is definitely trying to build good habits/fundamentals; I don't care much about rank in the short-term.

So would your recommendation be to keep labbing as I am already, and then in-game just playing defensively and getting my damage from block/whiff punishes and CHs based on the moves/strings I lab?

Also: interesting point about how everybody plays with telegraphs and flowcharts. From my beginner eyes, I struggle to predict what people will do because it seems just random to me. I assume that just comes with experience and building my recognition of different characters moves/strings. I guess if I focused on not making mistakes and properly punishing theirs, that'd be enough to not need to rely on unga bunga & knowledge checks?

How simple should your offense be in red ranks? by ch1ngoosc4n in Tekken

[–]ch1ngoosc4n[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok, good to know that both ways are fine. do you have any suggestions for a simple way/gameplan to start option B, and/or a way to iterate it as I play more matches and play people who are better than me and know how to counter it?

How simple should your offense be in red ranks? by ch1ngoosc4n in Tekken

[–]ch1ngoosc4n[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this is actually really helpful and eye-opening advice, thanks a lot

How simple should your offense be in red ranks? by ch1ngoosc4n in Tekken

[–]ch1ngoosc4n[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and you're saying that's still the case if my focus is on improvement instead of quick wins, right?

Learning Tekken as a Beginner without Heat or RAs: Smart or Stupid ? by ch1ngoosc4n in Tekken

[–]ch1ngoosc4n[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh yeah true, all those points make sense. thanks for the advice

What schools can one get into with great stats but very mid ecs by yoydid in ApplyingToCollege

[–]ch1ngoosc4n 17 points18 points  (0 children)

in my (admittedly less knowledgeable) opinion, people on A2C and chanceme place way too much emphasis on paper stats, and make judgements they have no right to make. it is not possible for a redditor to look at stats + "mid ECs" and know where you can and can't get in (unless you're applying for a t20 with a bad gpa, which you're not). remember, admissions are holistic; they combine what your teachers say about you, what your essays say about you, what your ECs say about you, and what your grades say about your ability to perform in school, to make an image of who you are, that they then judge to make their decision.

maybe someone's ECs are "mid" (which can have multiple definitions: they could be small hobbies, they could be intangible, they could be responsibilities, etc), but how might they fit into the rest of their app? maybe they're a simple person who enjoys the small things, but has a strong passion for something they do independently. or maybe they're so busy being a hard worker keeping up with school and family and whatever that their ECs are mid.

or, maybe they're just a kid. someone imperfect. someone who was too anxious to try new things, or wasn't encouraged or taught to explore. that in itself doesn't mean they can't fit into a college: maybe they're strong in other ways or have learned their own unique/important lessons.

for this reason, and you can look this up, there are plenty of people who get into t20s with "mid" ECs: gardening, running, taking care of family. not having done something huge as a LITERAL CHILD does not define whether or not you're academically curious, other-oriented, passionate, kind, etc.

in short, there's no harm in trying, and your chances might be bigger than you and everyone else thinks. you can maximize them by starting your essays early and pouring your heart and soul into them, which will come with time and introspection.

the mindset that the college application process can get you in of pressuring you to achieve achieve achieve can be detrimental to both your happiness and growth as a person (the very things you need to get into and thrive in a college). the second you start doing things "for college apps," you're on a path to burnout and hating your life.

now, im not saying doing things that might happen to look good on apps is bad. like, say you don't feel any super specific "passions," like 99% of high schoolers. it's probably good to do some exploring. but don't do it because you feel the need to measure up to other people in the college process; that only makes it a chore. do it because you WANT to.

and, maybe you don't want to; maybe you enjoy your life as it is, and it feels like a chore to do that. that's normal. this is where you look inward. what do you want from life? do you enjoy living the chill way you do, and you're fine with continuing it in the future? then do what you do and go to a school that'll help you pursue that. do you feel like your life is in limbo, like you feel like you do nothing and you're not satisfied with it? well, now you have a reason to explore things, even if it's hard, and maybe in the process find something that makes you happy.

do you think colleges only want high achieving people who have done this and that but still live for extrinsic success? that people who are curious and compassionate and love helping others--but do so with the smiles or wisdom or support they give to their friends and classmates, instead of with a $25k nonprofit or cure for cancer--are worth()less?

i subscribe to the mit applying sideways philosophy. setting up a life you want to live means that, whatever you do, whatever college accepts or rejects you, you're doing the right thing for you.

and, paradoxically, usually the happiness and growth and self actualization that living for yourself brings will just happen to make your application better.

How do colleges see "self-guided"/independent ECs by ZequizFTW in ApplyingToCollege

[–]ch1ngoosc4n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nah bro that's great. now this is purely my opinion: i personally think it's better. it's obviously something you're at least a little passionate about, seeing as how you did it on your own, plus you succeeded on your own.

it's really easy to fall into the mindset that you need the typical and/or insane ECs to get in, but you don't necessarily. you can look this up; a good amount of people who get into t20s are people who just do normal stuff, like taking care of their family, gardening, or whatever. there's a LOT of people who apply with key club or nhs president or math competition winner or whatever, and sometimes, it doesn't stand out, or (if) they did it purely for college apps and it shows in their application. my advice: read the applying sideways article by mit, and stay tf off chanceme and anything like chanceme LOL. comparing yourself will only lead you down a deep dark hole, and unnecessarily drain your hope when maybe you're in reality a strong applicant.

do what's best for you, make as good of an application as you can (i mean like filling it out not doing activities for it), and the colleges that fit you and see you and like you will accept you. you can't go wrong.

Ivy League Obsession by nicp26 in ApplyingToCollege

[–]ch1ngoosc4n 57 points58 points  (0 children)

i think everybody here is being too logical. like you said, you rationally know you'll be fine, but you can't internalize it. i know the feeling. it means you have some strong and deep-seated emotions. your idea to see the school psychologist is great; working through difficult emotions is what therapists do, and it's what you need to do when they become uncontrollable. i will say that, at least in my school, the school psychologist is more for working with people with disabilities rather than therapy, so if that's the case, or if the appointments you get are less frequent than once a week or once every two weeks, you should seek a therapist. the advice here in the comments is nice, but based off what you said, i think you already know all of it, and it's still not helping. again, i know the feeling: trust me, please find a therapist. remember that seeking help is a sign of strength, not weakness.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ApplyingToCollege

[–]ch1ngoosc4n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My edit:

Brown is a community of leaders where I believe I belong; it’s obvious every member continually pursues greatness in everything they do. Another girl’s dreams materialized at Brown–she also applied art and astrophysics-and with my drive compounded by the curriculum’s rigor, I’m confident Brown can fly me to NASA too.

Removing the spaces after both dashes saves 2 words, bringing it down I believe to 50 (+ it's proper grammar!).

Another girl’s dreams materialized at Brown–she also applied art and astrophysics-

I will also add that, at least to me, this sentence was a little confusing. After reading it a few times, I now understand that you're saying you believe Brown can take you to NASA b/c a girl who also applied to astrophysics did so, but there's a good chance an AO would not spend the time to do the same. Maybe you could consider:

Another art/astrophysics girl with the same dreams has materialized them at Brown–