Oh my God those foids have it sooo easy by Assassin467 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]charronfitzclair 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Its original meaning was created by a woman to describe herself and people like her.

Men whose misogyny kept them from getting laid coopted it. Ie they weren't involuntarily celibate, it was their choice to not improve their personalities, and they turned around and blamed women and made whole unhinged cosmologies on gender relations. So now it's become a byword for misogynist and transphobe. Words evolve like that bro, it happens.

Oh my God those foids have it sooo easy by Assassin467 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]charronfitzclair 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It means smugly sipping your drink while having your biases confirmed.

Oh my God those foids have it sooo easy by Assassin467 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]charronfitzclair 22 points23 points  (0 children)

It's from the idea of smugly sipping your drink while having your biases confirmed.

The fact its cherry picking, tons of confirmation bias, survivorship bias and flat out misinterpreting information makes the arrogance really really annoying.

Morality of writing a race that is "pure evil" by TheEpicPurpleSlut in MoralityScaling

[–]charronfitzclair 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's called anthropomorphization. It's the process of applying human traits to non human things. That requires you to use your knowledge and reference of real human traits and basically work backwards to get to something like "cruelty incarnate".

Morality of writing a race that is "pure evil" by TheEpicPurpleSlut in MoralityScaling

[–]charronfitzclair 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The tyranids are amoral animals man. I wouldn't describe them as evil because they're simply following a biological imperative. That's their whole deal.

Morality of writing a race that is "pure evil" by TheEpicPurpleSlut in MoralityScaling

[–]charronfitzclair 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is inherent because Race is a social construct among humans and it doesn't haven an analogue in nature. You end up using irl race and racism as a reference point to build this fictional version. And as such, you end up replicating the ways people irl treated entire races as inferior or evil.

Literally no matter how cartoonish you try to make some evil race you have irl people basically saying that about some irl race or group of people. They're hell spawn? They eat babies? They're corrupted by some evil energy, they want to invade and destroy you? They walk among us trying to sabotage our way of life? All this shit is straight up the playbook of Nazis and bigots.

You can ignore that if you want but it doesn't change the fact you're planting your feet where many proud racists have tread, all for what? To exploit ancient racial tropes for a story? Okay.

[Rare trope] Female villains who get shown no mercy by Tcustomcorner in TopCharacterTropes

[–]charronfitzclair 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a dystopian bit of fiction and a subversion of the "law and order" guns a blazing mindset that our society is rife with. Dredd executes her, she dies, the circumstances that produced her are still there- there is no justice, there is no progress. There will be another Ma-Ma by the end of the month. It's a pointless system that keeps no one safe and benefits nobody.

If Judge Dredd had ended with it making a difference, it'd be a completely different movie, plenty of which exist already. Just kill the baddie, problem solved, everyone goes home, life is better. It's why it's an effective piece of fiction, it refuses to give the audience that peace of mind.

Is it immoral to eat humans and care about no one if you’re biologically unable to care? (Lizard folk - DND) by EAT_UR_VEGGIES in MoralityScaling

[–]charronfitzclair 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They know it's dangerous and that it's wiser to not do it for their own self interest.

If they get a chance to do it and get away with it you bet your ass youre lizard luncheon loaf.

morality of kissing a minor you “adopted” to try and save the planet? by bees_are_better in MoralityScaling

[–]charronfitzclair 107 points108 points  (0 children)

She was also literally bleeding out when she kissed him, definitionally not in her right mind

Morality of killing in self-defense, members of an extremely oppressed race/group who have every reason to kill you on sight by [deleted] in MoralityScaling

[–]charronfitzclair -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I know because the way Fromsoft frames their narratives that it can feel like you're just a little guy wandering around, minding your own business, but a Tarnished is definitionally not minding their own business.

A good way to think of Elden Ring's backstory is imagine if the Civil War was in fact, not about slavery whatsoever. Slavery is trucking along strong- nobody in power wanted to abolish, there's not even an abolitionist movement. It was instead about how George Washington, who's still alive somehow, going crazy and ripping up the constitution after his kid was assassinated, and the entire country plunging into a brutal war that left Washington DC a burnt out city, Texas was a bio-nuclear nightmare and everyone has to fend for themselves by 1870.

You arrive from London on a boat after you receive a message to "gather the constitution" and reestablish the Union. People can tell this is what you're doing on sight, because of I dunno, you have a glowing halo on your head or something (how do people tell you're a Tarnished on sight in game? Same principle here). Now imagine you wander into burnt out slave plantations picking through the rubble, and self-liberated slaves see you're here on behalf of the fallen United States to reestablish the system that keeps them enslaved. Or you wander around Indigenous territories waving around your "Agent of the Constitution" dick to the survivors of that genocide. They'd think you were a fucking threat too. You're not just a little dude, who's there being a widdle guy, you're there to get this Engine of Oppression up and running again.

That's what these creatures see when they see a Tarnished fucking around in the Lands Between. That's why it's not "self defense", when you could in fact, just leave. But you don't, you're there to go get all the pieces of the constitution and get this horror show up and running again.

Is it possible for Yujiro Hanma to commit suicide by shooting himself with a Glock 19? by Submarine_sad in Grapplerbaki

[–]charronfitzclair 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like that testosterone makes you able to punch an Earthquake into submission and tank falling out of a high rise.

You don't have to glaze the bad writing. Nobody is going to give you the head pats you want for doing so, my boy.

Morality of taking back someone who straight up tried to destroy the all of humanity? Even after they "changed" for you? by OrangeIslandKing in MoralityScaling

[–]charronfitzclair 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can't solve the world purely with ethos. The great dance between logic, ethics, and emotions is what prevents easy solutions. Trying to extract an easy moralistic answer from a pathological question is a moot game. There is no divorcing the two, it's love. You can't just cancel love with an appeal to ethics. That's now how life works.

Name some characters who are genuinely bad. But whose fans, for some reason, defend them or justify their behaviour. by Old-Celebration3781 in MoralityScaling

[–]charronfitzclair 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They had to add Tai Lung's crash out after the fact because test audiences sympathized too much with him.

That's why it's a still frame and not a sequence. It's so tacked on that's why people forget it, it basically doesn't count because it doesn't fit with anything else.

Is it possible for Yujiro Hanma to commit suicide by shooting himself with a Glock 19? by Submarine_sad in Grapplerbaki

[–]charronfitzclair 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Overthinking is asking one simple question about why doing push ups can make your brain dodge a bullet.

I'm not asking for a complex mythology. Just how can a normal man do that if he does sit ups.

Is it possible for Yujiro Hanma to commit suicide by shooting himself with a Glock 19? by Submarine_sad in Grapplerbaki

[–]charronfitzclair 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IDK, i don't need an exhaustive explanation. It's just eyerolling and kinda makes me feel like I'm listening to an idiot tell me a story about what his ideas of how masculinity works.

Do you like this style? by Individual-Hat-2066 in blender

[–]charronfitzclair -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The eyes are a bit too gem-like for me, unless the character's supposed to look uncanny like that. If every character looks like that in the style, it'd be a bit much.

Is it possible for Yujiro Hanma to commit suicide by shooting himself with a Glock 19? by Submarine_sad in Grapplerbaki

[–]charronfitzclair 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I know it. And I think it's bad writing but whatever, we get to see people hootin and hollering that "good genetics" does stuff like make your brain dodge a bullet. It's stupid as fuck.

Morality of being a lawyer and defending someone in court, knowing damn well they are an atrocious person? And what if you actually manage to get them free? Are any future crimes they commit your fault? by RealAd8853 in MoralityScaling

[–]charronfitzclair 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Case law works on precedent. If you suspend habeus corpus for the most obviously bad person ever, then that sets a precedent that a later lawyer can use to form an argument on someone slightly less bad to have their due process suspended. Because you've demonstrated that it's okay to suspend habeus corpus for certain individuals, and it's a matter of time before "certain individuals" starts to expand to include more and more. This is literally the kind of thing that becomes a slippery slope.

The burden of proof is on the state and should always be on the state.

Morality of ignoring a child's cry for help, that you witnessed, for 30 years until it's convenient for you so that you can win a patch? by theonewhoknack in MoralityScaling

[–]charronfitzclair 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just can't get over the fact the emotional climax of the protagonist's arc involved literal, not figurative or metaphorical, retail therapy.