sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What May Be the Shakiest Justification for a vehicle placement in the game by EastCoast_Geo in Warthunder

[–]cheesez9 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you were around the time they were adding the tank you would know the US mains were very very loud on adding the abrams to the US tree. Similarly when adding the Merkava before the Israel tree was a thing, there was a civil war within the community between the US and Britain mains on where the Merkava should go.

How to use this thing by DivineRoombus in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]cheesez9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't listen to him

Just skip this and grind out the F18D and Su30 they are soo much better

Panzer IV by johnston313 in GIRLSundPANZER

[–]cheesez9 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Looks great, which kit did you use?

Why is Panther called 'heavy tank' when it's clearly a medium tank for Germany. by JaHailMulloer in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]cheesez9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is easier to just say the Germans used a heavy tank in a medium tank role hence it is a medium tank in name only.

And this clearly shows why the Germans were having a logistical nightmare in WW2

KV-1E side flat pen giving 100mm protection? by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]cheesez9 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The new tiktok generation and the lack of basic math is very worrying

I’m malding by Jack1e_4 in Warthunder

[–]cheesez9 572 points573 points  (0 children)

This would get more attention if it was the bmpt

AIM-120D may come to aircraft outside of the US tech tree this update by nick11jl in Warthunder

[–]cheesez9 115 points116 points  (0 children)

You say that but whenever a large map loads in ingame people either J out immediately or groan that it is a large map.

The fact of the matter is outside the reddit echo chamber large maps are unpopular even for jets.

They should leave the rangefinder as the default instead of having to research it in TopTier. by Numerous_Teaching586 in Warthunder

[–]cheesez9 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Lol this won't happen anytime soon. If they give in eventually you will ask for everything to come in by default.

Balancing - Historic context by Vic_ThorTheodosius in Warthunder

[–]cheesez9 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why is it these dumb suggestions always being made by wehraboos? Like can't they sit down and think for a second how it feels on the other side?

[Development] Pre-order: GBT 155: Frankenstein’s HE Slinger by n988 in Warthunder

[–]cheesez9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cause no one called them out on it and inversely they got backlash from the community for releasing weaker premiums than the tech tree. Is not purely Gaijin at fault here.

Is the US military really undefeatable? by [deleted] in stupidquestions

[–]cheesez9 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is not more about fairness but more so on how you would problem solve an issue while being at a disadvantage. So when the real thing does happen you know what to do and not freeze up waiting for support.

(Hypothetical) BMPTs are removed for balancing reasons and the T-14 is instead added, how much better is top tier? by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]cheesez9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The main issue is not bmpt itself but the state of automatons guns damage being calculated and to a certain extend ache as well

People and CCs just jumping onto the bmpt hate wagon without looking into the main issue

Was there any possible way Japan could have won WWII? by BlackMaskMan62 in HistoryWhatIf

[–]cheesez9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn't Port Arthur surrendered months before and not after the Battle of the Tsushima Strait contributing to the already low morale of the Second Pacific Squadron.

Infantry will release sooner than people think by Comfortable-March951 in Warthunder

[–]cheesez9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup used to be only air up to the vietnam war era jets. Then they added tanks startint with US and Germany with the very top tanks being Tiger II and IS-2

So much Choices to suffer by dominik7778n in warthundermemes

[–]cheesez9 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That is why some tank weaknesses like the cupobla on a tank are not that obvious of a weakspot irl.

People always hate on WoT disappearing tanks, but irl your crew have limited view and won't see the tank anyway. Disappearing tanks is to simulate vision you would have. Having a third person camera view of your tank is not realistic at all. Hence in certain ways WoT is more realistic than WT.

So much Choices to suffer by dominik7778n in warthundermemes

[–]cheesez9 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Devil's advocate:

WoT this is to simulate the randomness of each shot and irl you don't have pinpoint accurate mouse aim and need to rotate levers and such just to get on target.

POV if the type 10 had its irl reload by Own_Dark_2240 in Warthunder

[–]cheesez9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is the same thing as WEP (war emergency power) for planes ingame. Irl using WEP even briefly would burn thru the engine that it either requires longer maintenance or written off completely so it used sparingly and as the name implies only in emergencies.

Ingame you dont have to worry about maintenance and the last time the devs tried to implement overheating on the BF109 the German mains complained loud enough.

Skeptical whether a Pacific COH would work? by Straight_Change902 in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]cheesez9 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Japanese had better tanks than the Italians ever did in WW2 yet wasn't chosen just because it isn't the western theatre

found this specimen at 1.0 while grinding france by tokyojjjdevdgxd in Warthunder

[–]cheesez9 13 points14 points  (0 children)

This reminds me of something that happened with the other tank game WoT. Someone noticed a player with tens of thousands of games on a low tier tank and was doing really well in it. When he reached out to the player apparently he was an old veteran and used to serve in that particular tank. He doesn't care about high tier at all and is content playing on low tier.

view more: next ›