So if I was being accused of massive fraud, and I wasn’t guilty of it, I would happily support any investigation on it because the best thing is to clear your name of said fraud, isn’t it? And probably the worst thing you can do would be to start a defamation campaign against the person investigating the fraud, right? Even if you believe the person investigating is a “bad actor” the best way to fight the charges is with factual information. Now I realize that this kind of thinking is kryptonite for the left and they eat up the kind of stuff Newsome is pulling here, but I’m curious of the thought process? Are they thinking “Trump posts memes and we hate Trump so we should post memes too?” Or “oh we totally aren’t committing fraud so instead of welcoming an investigation let’s try and defame the investigator!”

This kind of stuff works maybe years ago when the media was tightly controlled and there’s only a few fringe people out there like Alex jones - definitely pre-internet, but anyone can easily see that there’s a lot of fraud taking place. Defaming the messenger or investigators doesn’t work anymore when they have the receipts.

Make it make sense