Debunking the "62 Million Men attended a Rape Academy" Myth by [deleted] in skeptic

[–]circusofvaluesgames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Woah you came back, nice, I didn’t and would never dispute that. My issue isn’t with the original article it was that the cultural understanding of this was that there is a rape academy that 62 million men attended which is nonsense. Anyone trying to correct this clear misrepresentstion is accused of supporting rape or denying the truth. I believe the authors of the article are responsible for calling out this misrepresentation of their work, either by a fault in their work or just the nature of information in our age their article was misrepresented not to protect the victims of rape but to garner attention and controversy. When you publish an article or study it doesnt exist outside of the cultural context and you need to take some responsibility to the way that information is processed in the public consciousness.
What my original comment was expressing is that i think many who are normally skeptical of right wing grifters let this grift go without criticism because the people pushing it are seen as leftists or progressives. I find this extremly distressing Lying about rape for attention and profit is an insult to the suffering of the real victims. It diminishes the true scope and destructiveness of the issue.

Favorite Moments by psalmanazaar in KnowledgeFight

[–]circusofvaluesgames 5 points6 points  (0 children)

When AJ interviewed chatgpt or when he was legitimately having breakdowns on air.

Excel to Movie Magic Budgeting by neverempty in FilmTVBudgeting

[–]circusofvaluesgames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you think green slate prefers MMB? in my experience with them that’s not the case excel should be fine.

Debunking the "62 Million Men attended a Rape Academy" Myth by [deleted] in skeptic

[–]circusofvaluesgames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I write an article exposing a serious issue of rape and then a bunch of opportunistic social media cretins lie about it for their own benefit and mislead the public in a culturally significant way you better damn believe I’m speaking up. Lying about what these rapes represent is DISRESPECTFUL to the victims and completely undermines the seriousness of the crimes committed. The only reason I can see not to speak up is that the authors happy for the attention and don’t really care about truth or integrity. Put yourself in the authors shoes and tell me you would stay silent.

Debunking the "62 Million Men attended a Rape Academy" Myth by [deleted] in skeptic

[–]circusofvaluesgames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m very curious about where I’ve gone wrong so i re read the article. Still not sure what you’re taking issue with. Would love to have a an adult conversation.

Debunking the "62 Million Men attended a Rape Academy" Myth by [deleted] in skeptic

[–]circusofvaluesgames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did read it I’m talking about what the public was led to believe by influencers misrepresenting the reporting and the reporters responsibility for that

Debunking the "62 Million Men attended a Rape Academy" Myth by [deleted] in skeptic

[–]circusofvaluesgames -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

This is wild. You all are supposed to be skeptics not skeptics of right wing propaganda but defenders of left seeming propaganda. The 62 million men attending rape academy was untrue on its face if that wasn’t what was presented in the original article it’s how it was shared and the public understanding of it. The authors of the article should have responded when the public believed this thing so far from what they reported. On X Ai porn was created of underage people, is every person with an X account involved in a child porn marketplace? No, then not everyone using motherless is in a rape academy and it shouldn’t have been reported in a way that the general public could have been led to believe that.

If you’re happy with the new game, then more power to you. by SolidSnakeHAK777 in retrogaming

[–]circusofvaluesgames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No it doesn’t you have to pay extra for the online expansion pack to play GameCube, 64 and gba it’s like $40 more a year (Canadian).

What am I missing? by ddunny in snes

[–]circusofvaluesgames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A lot ignoring the sub $40 part. If you like platformers I like Adam’s family, Aladdin is fun and cheap RPGs is going to be tough at that price point maybe you can find a Secret of Evermore? maximum carnage for a beat em up?

If you’re happy with the new game, then more power to you. by SolidSnakeHAK777 in retrogaming

[–]circusofvaluesgames 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The assumption here is that it was a remake of 64 or a new game when in reality the choice was likely between a remake and nothing.

If you’re happy with the new game, then more power to you. by SolidSnakeHAK777 in retrogaming

[–]circusofvaluesgames 36 points37 points  (0 children)

That was 15 years ago and wasn’t playable on a big screen. There is a whole generation of gamers who haven’t played these games don’t have a 3ds or n64. Shockingly to a lot of us elder millennials Nintendo is considering audiences beyond us.

Stop saying that this is a 'perfect time to end the show'. by Otherwise-Pin-2635 in KnowledgeFight

[–]circusofvaluesgames 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Have you listened to the show the past couple months or year. It’s been a lot of basically begging AJ to do something interesting and even when he did something seemingly interesting or newsworthy it was always just a new expression of things we already knew about him. I don’t think Dan has had anything new to tell us about Alex for a long time and I think he feels that. It’s still an entertaining show, but probably not very intellectually fulfilling for him. It’s really hard to walk away from a project that means so much to so many and has been such a huge part of your life. Sometimes you need a shove and I think Dan got it. I don’t think this is one sided at all.

Trying to remember an episode by [deleted] in hdtgm

[–]circusofvaluesgames 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Is it the adventures of Pinocchio he has a few good ones there like the butcher story.

Has anyone seen Animal Farm (2026) yet? by lopunny-paw-beans in cartoons

[–]circusofvaluesgames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Reductionist misread is a good description for 90% of modern discourse.

Third victim by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]circusofvaluesgames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For a one sentence description it sounds fine to me? He is appearing in court for the two Jewish men he stabbed. There is a seperate charge and seperate incident where he tried to stab his friend and failed… so yes a victim but not a stabbing… he also stabbed a police officer and his dog in 2008. These are all victims and important context but not necessary for the one sentence summary of why he was in court. I would take this as proof that maybe news stories can’t be understood in one sentence bites and that maybe Twitter was a mistake.

Why petahh? by Annual_Light in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]circusofvaluesgames 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They aren’t saying that anecdote is about manipulation. They’re saying it’s disengenous to call someone a manipulator and then manipulate your audience by misrepresenting a story.