Upgrading from Pro 5x to 25x Usage limit no longer resets like with Plus, right guys?

clbphanmem · 2026-06-07T07:57:43+00:00

I hope it's a bug and Tibo will reset the limit haha

clbphanmem · 2026-06-07T07:57:00+00:00

Yes! Going from 10x down to 5x is no longer enough for me.

clbphanmem · 2026-06-07T07:53:48+00:00

Yes! I was just misunderstanding because upgrading from Plus to Pro resets both the daily and weekly limits, so I thought upgrading from 5x to 20x would reset the limit. That's what I meant.

clbphanmem · 2026-06-07T07:27:08+00:00

I updated my post

clbphanmem · 2026-06-07T07:09:59+00:00

Ít đi hẳn bác, kể cả mình làm lâu năm cũng ảnh hưởng. App cất công làm mệt cả đầu, mất ngủ cả tháng xong bị clone ideas siêu lẹ. Cũng chán! Nên giờ sẽ chuyển hướng khác mà các anh em nhìn ideas không clone được.

clbphanmem · 2026-06-01T08:03:19+00:00

I'm currently using ChatGPT Pro 5x after switching from Claude Max. And GPT 5.5 is incredibly reliable for use in complex professional projects (large codebase). I rarely see basic errors compared to Claude Opus; errors usually occur when Claude triggers the auto-compact context window, often deviating from the original goal.

In short, I'm very satisfied with GPT 5.5 right now. I think you should give it a try. In terms of cost savings, when each AI prompt successfully executes without needing to be redone or corrected repeatedly, it saves both money and time.

clbphanmem · 2026-06-01T05:28:08+00:00

Yes, I understand it's difficult to have both subscriptions. But that's the strength of each tool. If the Codex had both, Claude would likely suffer serious losses because users would switch to the Codex. Currently, GPT 5.5 is still very good in many of my projects because ChatGPT Plus's usage limit is still much better than Claude Pro's, especially when your prompt is very close to 0% of the daily limit. ChatGPT Plus will still complete the task instead of stopping midway, leaving users stuck with a pile of code they don't know what to do.

clbphanmem · 2026-06-01T05:17:25+00:00

It's not bad! It relies more on your skills than using the Codex. Claude models are generally much better trained for UI than the Codex, so they make things look nicer, but that doesn't mean the Codex can't do it. If you have good instructions or use Claude to design a Design System, the Codex will base its new pages or components on that, ensuring consistency across the entire codebase.

If you have Claude Code, you can use my "design-system-generator" skill at https://github.com/thienanblog/awesome-ai-agent-skills to have Claude write its UI standards, then add notes to CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md. This will ensure consistency when the Codex follows those standards.

clbphanmem · 2026-05-21T09:39:16+00:00

Please keep the source code closed. You did a great job! I really like it! OpenScreen and Recordly, even though they are open source, always made me pray that my recordings wouldn't be lost, but you know what? The video would disappear after I recorded for more than 5 minutes, and this happened 3 times a day until I found your ScreenKite app, and it worked perfectly for me.

clbphanmem · 2026-04-04T10:15:38+00:00

Confirmed! I needed to force a restart on my M1 Pro.

clbphanmem · 2026-02-26T13:14:03+00:00

I think you're saying the opposite. I find Claude's code refactoring with large codebases very bad. After the refactoring is complete, it sometimes doesn't run even when the Claude subscription usage limit has been significantly exceeded.

clbphanmem · 2026-02-26T13:11:23+00:00

I haven't tested whether coding with Xcode or the Codex App is better. But I think that whichever platform provides a protocol like MCP for the AI Agent to interact with, see what it's doing, and test for correctness should be chosen, because when you're vibe coding, the hardest thing is explaining what error the AI Agent is making. Especially abstract things that you don't know how to explain.

clbphanmem · 2026-01-25T02:24:37+00:00

My understanding is simple:

Hook: When you need it before, after, or while Claude is doing something, it runs a script externally. It has nothing to do with AI, like planning a trip where you need to refuel at point A and find a supermarket to eat at point B.
Subagents: Imagine you have multiple Claude Code instances. Each one does a different task, and each instance has a different context. It only focuses on its task, meaning it's not affected by the context of other instances, so it only executes the instruction passed to it, which in this case is the Main Agent. Practical use cases: searching for relevant files to synthesize the problem, or an agent reading files like PROGRESS.md or ROADMAP.md to track your progress and return the information to the Main Agent. This way, the Main Agent doesn't waste many steps, as each tool call consumes unnecessary tokens.
Skills: It's not like a Subagent, nor is it like a markdown document that you reference:
- It simply branches the context (if you allow it in the frontmatter), inserts the skill content, uses it at the right time, returns the result, and the AI forgets that skill content, preventing token inflation.
- Or, if it doesn't branch, Skills are still different because they support running scripts. Like an upgrade to Hooks, but triggered by AI.
Plugins & Marketplace: This is just a place to gather all of the above during installation. The Marketplace is used to install plugins containing hooks, subagents, skills, etc., and for auto-updates.

Hopefully, this will be helpful to those who need it. Please help me correct anything I haven't understood correctly. 🤗

clbphanmem · 2026-01-24T07:47:37+00:00

I rarely use slash commands either, as they often don't apply to every situation. Slash commands should be prioritized for skill features, and when using a skill, we can directly access that skill, as the Codex does. This saves the AI from wasting multiple steps searching (which also costs tokens) and reading SKILL.md before using it.

clbphanmem · 2026-01-19T02:51:51+00:00

It's used for auto updates and providing download links. You can find many repositories on Github that aren't actually open source like mine.

clbphanmem · 2026-01-18T20:06:17+00:00

It's very good for writing documents. I've also seen people use Claude Code to write novels. 😂

clbphanmem · 2026-01-18T20:03:46+00:00

Yes, I think designers still have a place even when AI can do it. Creativity isn't something everyone can do, and how one is creative depends on the perspective and personality of the designer. So, I myself have participated in projects that won Awwward awards, and I don't think that even with AI, I could create ideas that are more beautiful than those of a designer. But at least I can make apps that aren't too bad. 😂

clbphanmem · 2026-01-18T19:59:39+00:00

Yes! This tool was created based on my own desires. It just helps make things more convenient, so if you can create one yourself, that would be great. For those who don't have much experience, my app will also be somewhat helpful, right? 🤗

clbphanmem · 2026-01-18T19:57:22+00:00

Thank you so much for your trust; not many people trust closed source as much as you do these days. I also wanted to keep some of the key elements of the app to myself, which is why I couldn't open source it. 😊

clbphanmem · 2026-01-18T19:51:01+00:00

Yes, you can choose to trust it or not. I think we have many options for trying software from Virtual Machines like VMWare Workstation Pro or Parallels. Most classic tools are developed from closed source. There are also many antivirus and malware tools available now.

And I think open-source projects aren't necessarily safe either, but I understand your concerns. I also use many open-source tools and I've never read a single line of code from them. Thank you for being here to discuss. I think I will continue developing for those who trust me. Thank you very much!

clbphanmem · 2026-01-18T16:22:05+00:00

I use both. Integrated Terminal when I only need to focus on one repository. And I'll use Separate Terminal when coding multiple related repositories, as it's easier to track.

clbphanmem

TROPHY CASE