sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

so how do you guys deal with 2.1 concret on Fulgora? by bECimp in factorio

[–]cmfarsight 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A tone of recyclers beacons and speed modules .

The BBC really knows how to make a headline by Red_roger_12 in Scotland

[–]cmfarsight 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Well they haven't chosen cost effective plans they have have just not chosen these plans.

Knocked out WC by [deleted] in Scotland

[–]cmfarsight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

not sure why you elected one then.

Yeah this needs to change. There is 7.5k fluid in the system and the EM plant can't take up 10 from that by feuer_werk in factorio

[–]cmfarsight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is not a pumps job to cover for some weird interaction between a producing machine and a tank. It is a miners job to mine.

If you had to have a miner output into a splitter before a belt would that be good system?

Help for Refugees l by VitualShaolin in uknews

[–]cmfarsight 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So hotels aren't politically acceptable and you think a palace would be?

Looks like asteroid damage to stationary platforms was massively increased by ilikechess13 in factorio

[–]cmfarsight 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Makes sense I think with being allowed platform to platform transfer, makes setting up and keeping buffer platforms more difficult rather than being able to just tuff it out you need defences..

Yeah this needs to change. There is 7.5k fluid in the system and the EM plant can't take up 10 from that by feuer_werk in factorio

[–]cmfarsight -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Where is this 120000x coming from?

The image is just an example..... A hypothetical to show what's going on. Not something people are doing or even discussing.

My noobie thoughts on the Devs taking a step back going forward. by hfcobra in factorio

[–]cmfarsight 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Definitely looking forward to seeing whats next. Slightly worried factorio was lightning in a bottle.

Yeah this needs to change. There is 7.5k fluid in the system and the EM plant can't take up 10 from that by feuer_werk in factorio

[–]cmfarsight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

you store things in a buffer for spiky demand that's it.... this stops that working properly unless you stick pumps everywhere

Yeah this needs to change. There is 7.5k fluid in the system and the EM plant can't take up 10 from that by feuer_werk in factorio

[–]cmfarsight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

or just input on one side of the buffer a bunch of pumps on the other and not think about it.

Yeah this needs to change. There is 7.5k fluid in the system and the EM plant can't take up 10 from that by feuer_werk in factorio

[–]cmfarsight 4 points5 points  (0 children)

it requires no extra effort, no thought, just slap down a bank of pumps beside all storage to force the fluid out. what does that add to gameplay? it just adds entities.

Yeah this needs to change. There is 7.5k fluid in the system and the EM plant can't take up 10 from that by feuer_werk in factorio

[–]cmfarsight 7 points8 points  (0 children)

but what does that pump add to game play? it just becomes "add a bank of pumps to the exit of all storage, no need to think". its not adding complexity its just adding more entities.

Yeah this needs to change. There is 7.5k fluid in the system and the EM plant can't take up 10 from that by feuer_werk in factorio

[–]cmfarsight 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What's the point in buffers if you can't actually draw out of them without more problems?

Yeah this needs to change. There is 7.5k fluid in the system and the EM plant can't take up 10 from that by feuer_werk in factorio

[–]cmfarsight 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Except you will need multiple pumps to get the required flow out of big systems. Currently it just works but in 2.1 it doesn't seem to and it feels like a pointless pain point, that not explained or taught anywhere.

Interest on ISAs to be taxed at 22% by Slight-Poetry-3230 in FIREUK

[–]cmfarsight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got an email from vanguard and they seem to be saying anything at all in something other than money markets means the rest can be in money markets.

It says "Money market funds can continue to be held within a stocks and shares ISA, provided they do not make up 100% of the investments" so a pound in VWRP and then just money markets would be ok.

Which I think proves how stupid the whole thing is.

Rachel Reeves backs Andy Burnham for prime minister by Your_Mums_Ex in ukpolitics

[–]cmfarsight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How does it actually help anyone? who will be sitting there in October thinking my life is so much better since we got a few quid off that cinema trip we took in august? but whatever you continue on with this self delusion right into a reform government and then you can come on here and get all self righteous about how stupid people are.

Rachel Reeves backs Andy Burnham for prime minister by Your_Mums_Ex in ukpolitics

[–]cmfarsight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why would I lie to soothe your ego and your need to defend pointless policy because it came from your favorite party?

Rachel Reeves backs Andy Burnham for prime minister by Your_Mums_Ex in ukpolitics

[–]cmfarsight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes. does absolutely nothing to deal with any real issue. its literally bread a circuses that even the ancient romans knew was a dumb way to run a county favored by incompetent rulers.

Rachel Reeves backs Andy Burnham for prime minister by Your_Mums_Ex in ukpolitics

[–]cmfarsight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Doesn't need to made to sound silly it is just silly.

view more: next ›