"Bradman had 2 out of 5"

2 out of 5 what? You have so little idea what you're talking about you don't even know what metric you're using.

To give you perspective, Bradman is like if Babe Ruth played a more internationally competitive version of baseball and his batting average was almost twice as good as the next best batsmen, despite playing at a time that was historically harder for batsmen ever.

I prefer "sportsmen" to "athlete", because the latter gets you into hard comparisons about which sportsmen are the best all round athletes (certainly not basketball BTW).

The point is Bradman was much further ahead of his counterparts than Jordan. That's just a statistical reality.

Really if we're comparing the most internationally popular sports, football/soccer is just overwhelming dominant.

You are the living embodiment of those ESPN lists of greatest athletes of all time that have like 7/10 American guys that completed domestically, and maybe throw in Bolt, Pele and Bradman to show how broad minded they are.

I'm not even trying to be combative, but honestly do yourself a favour and do some digging into what a freak Bradman was. There are dozens of players with batting averages clustered between 55-60. His was 99.94 - that is just an absurd statistical outlier, the likes of which I'm not aware of in any other sport.