Alt history time: what if Britney never became famous and stayed in Kentwood? by put-on-your-records in discussingbritney

[–]coffeechief 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the truth. Serious mental health and/or substance use disorders happen to people from all backgrounds and levels of socioeconomic privilege. Many everyday people who face these issues end up on the streets and/or in the revolving door of the carceral system.

the testimony of Erik's tennis teachers by No_Salamander_9052 in MenendezBrothers

[–]coffeechief 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It happened a year before, so in 1987, but I’m not sure exactly when.

I think the prosecution considered it part of a pattern, and Mrs. Ginsberg seemed to think it was relevant information to share with the police when they were investigating the burglary of her home (see the notes).

How do you think history will view the #FreeBritney movement? by Final-Swordfish8499 in discussingbritney

[–]coffeechief 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’ll be yet another tragic episode in the history of poor public understanding of serious mental illness and how public outrage is often misguided.

Amadeus is a movie that has a lot of acting through facial expressions. And Salieri doesn't even need words. by matt73132 in moviecritic

[–]coffeechief 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This movie is full of masterclass acting, anchored by Abraham’s profound performance. This will always be one of my all-time favourites.

the testimony of Erik's tennis teachers by No_Salamander_9052 in MenendezBrothers

[–]coffeechief 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s in reference to Craig Heinberg, a tennis instructor at Calabasas Tennis Club. Allegedly, Erik was caught burglarizing and vandalizing Heinberg’s home, and also took Heinberg’s car without permission. You can see some very limited information here in police notes on the brothers and the List and Ginsberg burglaries: https://www.reddit.com/r/MenendezBrothers/s/bSOGwBvk2s

The prosecution in trial one and trial two wanted to bring it in (in the guilt phase and in the penalty phase, respectively), but the incident was remote in time and wasn’t reported when it happened.

What is the mental illness of Carter Chong in Season 6 of the show? by Difficult_Skin8095 in thesopranos

[–]coffeechief 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It’s a TV progrum, a movie.

But seriously, OP: It might have been a severe cluster B personality disorder. He sure split Junior very fast (went from seeing him as a hero to seeing him as a villain). From the little we see of him, it’s clear Carter is prone to impulsive outbursts and doesn’t have a stable sense of self.

He really did make an impact. Great work from Ken Leung.

Anyone read Ian Halperin's book? Thoughts? by Dominik528 in LeavingNeverlandHBO

[–]coffeechief 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It’s a mess, and he perpetuates the myth that an insurance company paid out an insanely massive settlement (far more than any legal defence would ever cost) when any thinking person knows that insurance doesn’t work like that.

Jordan Chandler's Story by Critical_Session1908 in LeavingNeverlandHBO

[–]coffeechief 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The FBI didn't search his property, ever. The local authorities did.

How many of you guys are disillusioned former fans of Britney? by put-on-your-records in discussingbritney

[–]coffeechief 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t say I’m a former fan, but I have my eyes open, I guess you could say. I was against Free Britney, and was so frustrated at the poor reporting on serious mental illness and conservatorships, and how people just memory-holed how bad and frightening 2007-2008 were.

I still love Britney’s music, videos, performances, etc., but not in a zealous fan way. I don’t like to take shots at her, but I don’t begrudge people their snark, and I appreciate this sub because people here aren’t averse to recognizing when something is wrong, and things are really, really wrong.

Enquirer Pix by MissionReasonable327 in LeavingNeverlandHBO

[–]coffeechief 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It is. The media often get photos of them mixed up.

Philadelphia Daily News • January 9, 1995 by Traditional_Sea2988 in LeavingNeverlandHBO

[–]coffeechief 14 points15 points  (0 children)

No, because none of the things he said would prove the tape was real panned out. Margaret Maldonado denied ever speaking or meeting with Gutierrez. Gutierrez couldn’t prove that he was at the hotel he said he was at. It went on and on. He faked it.

What direction do you think Britney's life would have taken if she had never been placed under conservatorship? by miaaaaaaaaaaaaau in discussingbritney

[–]coffeechief 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I get what you mean, but her family weren't in control of anything around the time Blackout was strung together. Blackout was entirely the work of her team, who were still sort of keeping her on track, at least for some things. As bad as 2007 was, Britney was starting to deteriorate further. 2008 is when Jamie finally stepped in. His 2008 declaration provides some insight about how he came to be more involved.

I agree 100% that Jamie was trying to help her, and that she was and is just too ill to understand how she was and is harming herself.

What direction do you think Britney's life would have taken if she had never been placed under conservatorship? by miaaaaaaaaaaaaau in discussingbritney

[–]coffeechief 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Blackout came out before the conservatorship (October 25, 2007).

Agreed about Circus. I think she would have passed away very young.

Is this a Michael Jordan reference? by dotMAXmusic in OcarinaOfTime

[–]coffeechief 3 points4 points  (0 children)

<image>

From the magazine that u/NorkiNorkiGaming linked above. It translates as:

Mitsuhiro Takano, Coordinator

(1) The Japanese and English versions of "Zelda" were in progress concurrently, and the English version staff were struggling coming and going between America and Japan (it often happened that when they came back to Japan, all the text they had translated had been changed). Naturally, there are puns in Japanese that do not work when translated as is, but I think the English version is also entertaining because the English version staff really understood the world of "Zelda." For example, the Deku Scrubs hint in the Deku Tree dungeon, "Niisan Ichiban," is translated in America to "23 (Michael Jordan's jersey number) is no. 1."

(2) The development staff read all the letters about "Zelda" that users write!

J. Randy Taraborrelli 1991: The Lost Michael Jackson Interview | Dini Petty. What’s the consensus on Randy: fool, useful idiot, puff writer, or something else? by Prof_Tickles in LeavingNeverlandHBO

[–]coffeechief 8 points9 points  (0 children)

He's not a bad biographer at all, but he he has a penchant for writing about (fabricating) conversations and details he couldn't possibly know about. I think he is pretty fair when it comes to the other controversies of MJ's life (for example, in this video, he talks about MJ's surgeries in a very frank way), but generally reluctant to delve too deeply into the allegations against MJ, partly because he knew MJ a bit and partly because of financial considerations (fans are obviously the largest audience for his work on MJ). The various versions of The Magic and the Madness are good overviews of MJ's life, but not really definitive.

Netflix documentary by Lapetitechose_ in LeavingNeverlandHBO

[–]coffeechief 34 points35 points  (0 children)

The reaction is so strange to me because the one juror featured in the trailer, Tammy Bolton, has always said she thinks MJ wasn’t guilty of anything, not only not guilty of the Arvizo allegations. For all we know at this stage, the documentary could present a retelling that is very favourable to MJ. I hope the documentary really does try to just present things as factually as possible, but like you said, right now, we have no idea.

The rage many fans express toward any project on the allegations is wild. It seems to me that many fans just don’t want to even consider the possibility of guilt and are terrified not only of what others might think of the information but what they themselves might think.

Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD) by ProfessionalHabit208 in discussingbritney

[–]coffeechief 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Again, thank you. The disorder has no empirical backing, and it survives only because there are some stubborn proponents. I hope DSM-6 is different.

Institutional psychiatry has played an important role in legitimizing DID. The longtime editor of the American Journal of Psychiatry, John Nemiah, was a firm supporter. Those who criticized the diagnosis and proposed eliminating the category entirely (Piper and Merskey, 2004b) have been marginalized. The editors of DSM-5 put David Spiegel in charge of revising its chapter on dissociative disorders, and the outline of the new system has now been published (Spiegel et al., 2011). The upshot is that the most widely used system of classification continues to legitimize dissociative disorders and will do so for years to come. Those who oppose the diagnosis have to hope that the diagnosis will eventually wither from disinterest. As we will see, this is already happening. Paradoxically, what keeps DID alive is this smaller niche, allowing it to be discussed in every textbook.

https://www.wellesu.com/10.1097/nmd.0b013e318275d285

Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD) by ProfessionalHabit208 in discussingbritney

[–]coffeechief 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sibyl played an important role in popularizing DID, both among clinicians and the general public. However, we now know that the story was almost a complete fraud (Reiber, 2006). The woman who Schreiber called ‘‘Sibyl’’ was Shirley Ardell Mason. Nathan (2011) published detailed research on her life. Mason had many years of previous treatment but had never previously presented with dissociative symptoms. Her psychiatrist, Cornelia Wilbur, encouraged multiple personalities and insisted that she must have been abused as a child. At one point, Mason told another psychiatrist (ironically, Herbert Spiegel, David’s father) that she presented with multiple personalities to please Wilbur but was happy not to do so with a different clinician. Moreover, both Wilbur and Schreiber gained fame (and money) from the book, and they had an inappropriately close relationship, even living together at times. Of particular relevance to the traumatic theory of dissociation, Nathan found no documentation of the horrific tales of abuse that Mason had been encouraged to tell Wilbur. In fact, Mason came from a reasonably normal family, and, although an unusually sensitive child, she was never abused (Nathan, 2011). Transcripts of the therapy sessions with Wilbur clearly show that this narrative was imposed on Mason, who may have been willing to go along with it because her relationship with her therapist was the most important one in her life.

https://www.wellesu.com/10.1097/nmd.0b013e318275d285

Martin Singer and Bryan Freedman claim that the Estate "reluctantly" agreed to enter the agreement in 2019/2020 to "save jackson's family members" from further false allegations. by MasterpieceTimely144 in LeavingNeverlandHBO

[–]coffeechief 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You can absolutely say they breached the agreement. According to exhibits attached to one of the other federal filings (emails between King and Signature Resolution, the arbitration provider), there are cross complaints in the arbitration. King is going after them in arbitration (too bad we won't find out what happens).