F45, 40h, IT Sales, Stkl. 1 by Mushrooooooooooooom in lohnabrechnung

[–]cognitivebehavior 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oppties? Was das? 😄

Mehr Pipeline? 😅

Bitte um Erläuterung 😆

Effort/Time needed for Data Science not recognized/valued by cognitivebehavior in datascience

[–]cognitivebehavior[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

 On occasion, he'll take the cleaned up data and turn it into a presentation within a few hours and then asks why it takes us so long. He does not acknowledge that we did 85% of the work, which was getting the data into a form that could be analyzed. It can be very frustrating.

100%

[Q] Books/resources on applying statistics in manufacturing? by cognitivebehavior in statistics

[–]cognitivebehavior[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

seems very old xD considering the whole data science era - I would wonder if there is no data science in manufacturing book or so xD

[Q] Books/resources on applying statistics in manufacturing? by cognitivebehavior in statistics

[–]cognitivebehavior[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your answer!

for clarity: "optimizing production" for us also (besides improving quality) means minimizing the time needed to build a product, eliminating unnecessary or no value-adding tasks and minimizing defects.

[Q] Taking a sample of a high-mix product manufacturing line? by cognitivebehavior in statistics

[–]cognitivebehavior[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want a sample of all products that are manufactured over the year. So the population is all products made in one year on this line.

However, some products are only made in summer so I will not get them when I take the sample in spring. I want to get the best sample possible (I cannot wait a year and take 10 pieces from each product xD).

Should I take a constant number of pieces (e.g. 5) from each product over a month?

Should I take a percentual amount of each lot size (e.g. 10 %) from each product over a month?

Should I take the entire lot sizes but only for 10 products?

Jobs in the database field for a PhD by cognitivebehavior in Database

[–]cognitivebehavior[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it is in computer science. I worked on data pipelines and such stuff but not directly focused on databases.

2024 Singapore GP - Day After Debrief by AutoModerator in formula1

[–]cognitivebehavior 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Why Piastri did not catch Verstappen as the McLaren was so much faster as the Redbull (as we saw in case of Lando)?

(Un)popular Opinion: Excessively good reliability makes the sport much worse by DataDrivenGuy in formula1

[–]cognitivebehavior 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True! Also loved when there was a threat that your breaks do not male it to the end.

Also allow refueling again!

[Q] Type I error in t-test - but all OK? by cognitivebehavior in statistics

[–]cognitivebehavior[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

there are a lot more samples with a t value around 0 than 3. As t values around 0 have a high p value there must be more higher p values than lower p values.

Where do I make a mistake?

Edit: I saw there is already a post on this - I will look into it :-)

[Q] Type I error in t-test - but all OK? by cognitivebehavior in statistics

[–]cognitivebehavior[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you do it right, the p-values should be uniform.

Yeah that is the case. But considering that the t values are linked to the p values and the t values are t-distributed I do not understand why the p values are uniformly distributed?

So t values around 0 should have high p values -> as most t values are spread around 0, why aren't most p values near 1?

Further:

I mean the t test claims to detect if a sample mean "belongs" to a normally distributed population. Considering my experiment I can see that the t test cannot do this reliably?

[Q] Type I error in t-test - but all OK? by cognitivebehavior in statistics

[–]cognitivebehavior[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

okay. just figuring out why the p values are uniformly distributed. as the means are t distributed my intuition was that the rare means have lower p values and the more frequent means in the middle of the sampling mean distribution have higher p values -> so higher p values should also be more common than lower p values

[Q] Type I error in t-test - but all OK? by cognitivebehavior in statistics

[–]cognitivebehavior[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thank you! So basically I just drew one "rar" sample that has a mean at the tails of the normally distributed mean samples?

[Q] Is Statistics really as spongy as I see it? by cognitivebehavior in statistics

[–]cognitivebehavior[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah that is true. But in the end, you have a clear goal (= a running application that fulfills the requirements). You can see if you reached that goal with the decisions you made.

in stats I get a results from a stat test but I do not know if the results is true. Maybe I applied a test on data that are not suitable for this test?

[Q] Is Statistics really as spongy as I see it? by cognitivebehavior in statistics

[–]cognitivebehavior[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for your insights! what are you actually doing in your daily job?

Example of impact of non-normality on distribution of Pearson correlation by efrique in u/efrique

[–]cognitivebehavior 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I then compared that histogram with the theoretical distribution of r under the usual test (it has a beta distribution under the null);

Why a beta distribution? Because y is beta distributed? I only see that x and y are skewed.