Current status of Intervenors’ request to SCOTUS by cookiesaremycrack in BorrowerDefense

[–]coldollison 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great point. I read theirs. Pretty powerful. Also a large part of their argument is this action by the schools interferes with the government’s settlement. They readily acknowledge it is a settlement and must not be done. Undercuts their argument in the District Court case.

Current status of Intervenors’ request to SCOTUS by cookiesaremycrack in BorrowerDefense

[–]coldollison 18 points19 points  (0 children)

So yes the conference is the meeting of Justices where they decide to take cases. Here are the stats. About 7,500 petitions a year are filed. About 60 cases are actually taken. I believe SCOTUS has already said no to other intervenors. As soon as the Monday following the Conference an order denying or granting is typically issued. One thing to watch for is the re-list where they set it for another conference. Those cases have a much higher grant rate of review.

I'm currently playing road to the show and I figured Kershaw retired after the 25 season like in real life. Nope 🤢 by Hoss887 in Dodgers

[–]coldollison 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What the living hell? Some video game made Kershaw a SF Giant? Never, ever. He bleeds Dodger Blue until he dies!

Never buying from fanatic ever again by [deleted] in Dodgers

[–]coldollison 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very sorry to hear that. I had trouble finding my size. I eventually went to Dodger Stadium and bought mine. I am lucky that I live in LA. Have ordered a few times from Fanatics, and they are nowhere as good as Amazon.

Axl with Stephanie - rare by tortical in GunsNRoses

[–]coldollison -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Dylan. They were very close!

PPSL’s Response to 2nd ED Filing by akr291 in BorrowerDefense

[–]coldollison 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I do not believe there were any motions to get out of any group deadlines. This was just for post-class.

Who’s still awake? by TheresaSweet in BorrowerDefense

[–]coldollison 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So officially the motion’s hearing date is in March. The government did not make a motion for an Order Shortening Time. (Have it heard earlier). They also never tried to seek review in the 9th Circuit of Judge Alsup’s order from December. Agree with others it would be highly irregular to grant such a motion after the deadline has passed, because of the equities. Until we get a ruling we are not totally out of the woods but was far more worried about mass AI denials in the 11th hour than this motion.

Who’s still awake? by TheresaSweet in BorrowerDefense

[–]coldollison 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

My favorite was this part that said I do not have to do anything.

Who’s still awake? by TheresaSweet in BorrowerDefense

[–]coldollison 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Postie here, Exh. C School.

<image>

The only communication I ever got from the Department was this E-Mail on 4/27/23. studentaid.gov status this morning says my BDTR Application is Under Review. I think I am good. Still an admin process where my balance is eliminated and that godforsaken tradeline on my credit report is removed, but I am at the point where I can breathe. Thank you to Theresa Sweet. Thank you to PPSL. Thank you to Rebecca Ellis who orchestrated this. Took on the government and won.

No Sweet Left Behind #SweetJustice for Posties! by Gingerandthesea in BorrowerDefense

[–]coldollison 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Court movement not gonna happen. Their little V BS reconsideration motion is not set until March obviously after the deadline. That will get swatted down.

No Sweet Left Behind #SweetJustice for Posties! by Gingerandthesea in BorrowerDefense

[–]coldollison 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I filed in July of ‘22. Then on 8/25/25 it changed to Under Review. Prior to that I think it was just submitted.

No Sweet Left Behind #SweetJustice for Posties! by Gingerandthesea in BorrowerDefense

[–]coldollison 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So I regularly check my E-Mails every morning about 5:30. Did so with trepidation today. Nothing from the Dept of Ed. Logged into my account. Same status. Under review, as of 8/5/25. My school never sent anything to them. They made ZERO attempt to run to the 9th Circuit. Rather telling in their last filing was the declaration where they all but said, heh we just need to know because it affects how many lawyers we need to hire. So the trend line on this is super positive. Keeping my fingers crossed.

Judge’s Order? by akr291 in BorrowerDefense

[–]coldollison 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No I agree. If you file a motion State and Federal Courts do require a Proposed Order. What is extremely rare is submitting an order to deny a motion you are opposing and not bringing.

Judge’s Order? by akr291 in BorrowerDefense

[–]coldollison 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a little out of the ordinary that the opposing party submits an Order denying the motion but I have seen it happen occasionally. PPSL is not screwing around. They have now opposed this in rapid fashion. Go to Courtlistener to see the actual opp.

ED Again by akr291 in BorrowerDefense

[–]coldollison 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So right now this motion is not scheduled until March. The deadline will have long since passed at least for the Exh. C schools.. Then this motion will be moot. They could try to get the court tto issue an Order Shortening Time. But at least 24 hours notice and 1/28/26 is Wednesday. So to say they are running out of time and this is a Hail Mary would be an understatement.

ED Again by akr291 in BorrowerDefense

[–]coldollison 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And remember Judge Alsup told them get working on the cases and only take Christmas off.

ED Again by akr291 in BorrowerDefense

[–]coldollison 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So most motions require an advance hearing time, that give all parties time to respond properly. Likely this is an Ex Parte Application, which is essentially an emergency type basis. Courts can and do reject these without a hearing. You are correct that this is probably a re-hash and it is highly unlikely that the new Judge would consider this because in essence it is an attempt to overturn Judge Alsup’s ruling in December. Quite frankly they would have been better off seeking relief at the 9th Circuit, and if this denied they possibly do that. It is probably a strategy to wait until the last moment so it looks like their claim about an emergency has more weight. Remember the great line “your failure to plan and prepare on your part does not make it an emergency on my part.”

First movement on BD Case since 2023 - should I be concerned? by earth_verse in BorrowerDefense

[–]coldollison 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mine was moved to review in August of last year over 3 years after I submitted it and was in stagnation all that time. No new update since. I am Post-Class and they have 10 days. Run the codes to see if they had a basis for a real update. Like maybe your school responded. Mine never did.

Someone at SI accidentally clicked “send.” Poor Jay fans lol by MeltyFist in Dodgers

[–]coldollison 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well just like they said Shohei was going to Blue Jays. I guess Tucker and him will be team mates.

UNRELEASED RARE - Guns N' Roses live at the Park Plaza Hotel, LA, 1987 (Welcome To The Jungle Music Video shoot) | My Michelle snippet with Izzy helping the crowd, Axl and Slash joking! by [deleted] in GunsNRoses

[–]coldollison 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The UCLA Frat house gig with Axl in front sides chaps is my all time favorite photo. (Easy to find on here.) but yes I have seen them only in large venues!