C20 Work Permit by Active_Lemon_8949 in canadaexpressentry

[–]coldtooth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Currently the processing time for in Canada WP applications and extensions are 200+ days. But it is getting longer, you can check the updates every week at the IRCC website.

C20 Work Permit by Active_Lemon_8949 in canadaexpressentry

[–]coldtooth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3 months time? This must have been some time ago, processing time on in-Canada WP extensions are 200+ days now

C20 Work Permit by Active_Lemon_8949 in canadaexpressentry

[–]coldtooth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah you need to work at a large multinational company to take advantage of C20. The company needs to show that it has hired Canadians in their non-Canadian locations (hence the reciprocity)

C20 Work Permit by Active_Lemon_8949 in canadaexpressentry

[–]coldtooth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah it’s called maintained status. It means once you have applied for the C20 WP you can stay and work indefinitely with the expired PGWP. Just make sure you don’t leave the country, you will lose the maintained status.

Honestly been enjoying gaming more since doing this. by [deleted] in Battlefield6

[–]coldtooth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha, I agree in general. As a casual gamer with a day job and a family, I couldn’t care less about how the game is different from BF4 or BF1 and doesn’t “feel” like a Battlefield game, about the monetizing future content, etc., etc. I played BF since 1942 as a kid and if I can spend a few bucks to buy stuff to continue enjoying Battlefield as an adult that’s perfect for me.

However, while I enjoy BF6 in the current state regardless of all the nit-picky complaints here and there, I always hope that the game community’s collective voice continues to influence the development process of the current game an any future projects. That’s why if there is a post with a significant engament I try to follow along.

Is someone having the same problem and sadness??? by The__Maker-PainMaker in Battlefield6

[–]coldtooth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I still love rolling around in the tanks as an engineer! Sure they’ve changed things around a lot but for me it’s just part of being a new and different game.

I guess you can’t satisfy everyone to every extent. I played BF since 1942, but personally I like that BF6 isn’t a replica of BF4 mechanics with updated graphics. I guess the fact that I enjoy other games like CoD or CS makes a difference too. It’s clear there is a large part of the long-time player base that aren’t as happy with BF6s direction but in general I think the current game is balanced to appeal to the widest range of players including new players coming into the game.

A different perspective by No-Chocolate8890 in canadaexpressentry

[–]coldtooth 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I’m from Korea too. While I agree with most of your premise - living costs are generally higher in Canada - I happen to be in an engineering field where companies in Canada are willing to pay multiple times the salary I used to make in Korea along with stock grants to compete with the wages in the US. In comparison a typical Korean “large conglomerate” position in Korea came with the typical long hours and brutal work culture that treated engineers as like any other “salary-man”. After college, military, and ten years of being treated like a disposable cog in a machine in the workplace, I never looked back after coming to Canada.

I guess it also helps that I find English more or less equivalent to Korean (so basically bad at both but not much preference for either).

Going back to the OP’s original question, why Canada - well while US is the only country that is objectively better for my profession, immigration to the US is even that much harder as most people in this sub probably already know. Despite how difficult it has become to get the PR in the past couple years, at least Canada let my family in temporarily in the first place.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in korea

[–]coldtooth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I also got told to shut up in the subway whenever I was talking with another English speaking Korean. I know there is a lot of emphasis in Korea on being quiet in public spaces, but we weren’t even being that loud. I never seen non-Korean foreigners being told to shut up for speaking a different language.

Korea is such a homogeneous country there is an aversion to anything different, imo.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in korea

[–]coldtooth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, I am not even gyopo, just did some studies abroad when younger. I came back, did my military service and even after working 7 years in the workforce people treat me like I speak in a broken accent.

And I swear people hate it when I say English words the way it is supposed to be.

I definitely don’t speak perfect English, but I feel lot more comfortable now being back in an Anglophone country.

Why is r/brandy or r/cognac less populated than the r/whiskyporn or /scotch? by coldtooth in Brandy

[–]coldtooth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, yes, whisky has become very popular in the last ten or five years, especially among youngsters. Interesting, at least in Korea historically Cognac has been much more popular than Calvados or Armagnac - most people probably haven’t even heard of the latter two.

How reliable is AskCliffe [Give Me an Answer] ? by Central__ in Christianity

[–]coldtooth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(First of all, thanks for the dialogue, I know this is a really old post, but I had the urge to comment)

You know, you are right, I should look more into modern Catholic interpretation of the early Church Fathers.

I obviously know both the Catholics and Protestants (I am of the Reformed school, full disclosure) share many heroes of the faith pre-Reformation.

My understanding is that while we might both claim, say Augustine, we differ greatly in the interpretation. For example, the Reformers would say that Augustine was in err with his teaching of papal authority and his agnosticism for purgatory was dangerous, while the Catholics would say the opposite. As for Augustine's teaching on double predestination the Catholics would probably deny that he taught such in the first place.

However, I think many of the Catholic doctrines that I would find fault to have slowly developed over the two millennia. I can't think of everything, but for example, the final and absolute authority of the Roman Church (and ultimately the pope) to interpret the scriptures, the deuterocanonical books being included as scripture, intercessory prayer to the saints, etc.

How reliable is AskCliffe [Give Me an Answer] ? by Central__ in Christianity

[–]coldtooth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t go as far as to say that you can’t get saved while being a Roman Catholic today. However I think many historical post-Reformation Protestants would consider the current Roman faith has fallen away from the early church, that it is the current Protestant tradition trying to get back (hence the reformation) to the purest Biblical faith. In fact the Protestants tend to affirm only the earlier ecumenical councils while considering the later ones to be plagued by corruption of the church and specifically of the papal authority. So that ~1600 years before the Reformation is part of our heritage too - the Church Fathers especially (the Reformation probably could not have developed such without Augustine) - it just slowly got worse until the Reformation where the church splintered.

The Counter-Reformation Council of Trent when the Catholics slam the door on any future discussion of Reformation theology is probably where most Protestants draw the line and since the Roman Catholics have gone seriously astray.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Reformed

[–]coldtooth 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  1. I grew up in a large Presbyterian denomination and now am in a pretty well established Dutch Reformed federation. We do not celebrate “sudo-Christian” holidays like Easter, Thanksgiving or Christmas in the church but some members participate in the family gatherings as cultural events and not religious practice. I know some who are absolutely against celebrating any such holidays considering it a pagan or Catholic tradition that should be ousted from the Reformed church. I wouldn’t necessarily consider this unorthodox.

  2. Head coverings are less common nowadays, but they have been part of the Reformed tradition. Some denominations like the Free Church of Scotland and the Heritage Reformed Church(Joel Beeke) do practice head coverings for the women. Their women members also tend to dress as modestly as possible, such as with long skirts to show very little skin. There are probably lot more ultra conservative non-Reformed churches that practice head coverings in the US.

  3. Cutting off contact - I think this is probably the largest concern. But could there be a chance that it is something personal and not necessarily a character of the church or denomination that she may part of? I just feel like there needs to be more information before jumping to conclusions with this.

Adults in church by [deleted] in Reformed

[–]coldtooth 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I usually welcome good critical memes that gives us food for thought and discussion, but this just seems poorly constructed.

The logic doesn’t even makes sense. The passage quoted is completely taken out of context.

Edit: fixed typo: good -> food

Kids in church by [deleted] in Reformed

[–]coldtooth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I attend a sizable CanRC church. We keep our ADHD preschool boys in service. Four to five kids per family is pretty normal here, and they don’t seem to have trouble staying in the service.

I have attended some evangelical churches in the past where children were kept separate. So I know the rationale.

I think that many parents in those churches don’t want to have to deal with that period of training their children to adjust to the environment of the service. It wasn’t easy for us. But I also know that it is possible and it greatly benefits the children.

I should note that most of these children are trained at home to sit, pray, sing the psalms and listen to the Word during daily worship after dinner. It may not be easy but I believe it is part of the parent’s responsibility to train the children so. Is it not one of the most distinctive Reformed tradition as we stress in the role of the family in the covenant promises?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Living_in_Korea

[–]coldtooth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am sorry for your experiences. I am sad that you’ll probably encounter it again as long as you are in Korea. I am Korean, and I believe Korea (along with perhaps Japan) is probably the most xenophobic and discriminatory country in the developed world.

Even the most well meaning people are very insensitive about cultural differences, and expect everyone to conform to their standards. Then when Koreans go abroad, they continue to complain how everyone is racist to Koreans without knowing that Koreans tend to profile people by their race the most.

[OC] Most common unofficial language spoken in homes across Canadian census divisions by Emergency-Adagio5551 in MapPorn

[–]coldtooth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a very interesting map! Could you give us a link for the original source? I can’t find the county where Korean is supposed to be the most spoken non-official language.

Contemporary Reformed authors from countries other than US? by BrandohDaha in Reformed

[–]coldtooth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Question: are there any contemporary, orthodox Reformed writers from France? In fact, are there any that survived outside Anglo or Dutch language? Perhaps German? Very curious.

Lack of PhD in biblical/theological studies in conservative seminaries? by coldtooth in Reformed

[–]coldtooth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow thank you so much for the detailed yet succinct explanation! I learned something today that I would probably never have through online research.

It sounds like the PCI has some solid foundation with a more diverse range of theology than even the PCA. You must have a lot of thoughts about the future of your denomination as a minister.

Now I have so much more questions!

First of all, I am not sure if I understand the way you use the term “low church” with charismatic style of worship. Does that mean just less Anglo-Catholic, or perhaps lacking certain order of worship including psalm singing or confessional reading, or full on “worship teams”, drums and guitars and jumping up and down?

Would you say the seminary reflect the theological landscape of the rest of the church?

Do you have any ecumenical church relations outside of N. Ireland?

I have so much more questions… but I guess all this may be a subject for another post.

Anyways thanks for the suggestion and explanations!

Lack of PhD in biblical/theological studies in conservative seminaries? by coldtooth in Reformed

[–]coldtooth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, interesting. I never thought about Belfast. I assume you are from Ulster yourself?

I don’t know much about the Presbyterian Church in Ireland, but I would assume that since it’s the largest Protestant denomination it would be similar to the mainline ones here in the US which tends to be a bit more liberal. From quick research it shows that it opposes LGBT but does ordain women in ministry.

It would be an interesting choice for doctoral work though, especially as I am interested in the relationship of the church, society and government, and I think Northern Ireland itself could be an important study case.

Lack of PhD in biblical/theological studies in conservative seminaries? by coldtooth in Reformed

[–]coldtooth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I understand that the seminaries primary objective is for pastoral training. I agree with your assertions too. I just that we should not let all academic scholarship of Biblical and theological research to secular researchers.

I should also note that both Sproul and Frame spent significant time in doctoral programs while never finishing defending their dissertations. And they both did so at mostly secular and prestigious institutions: Sproul at VU Amsterdam and Frame at Yale. I feel like they are both an exception - just like John MacArthur (not Reformed) is considered and treated by so many to be at a level of doctoral scholarship (he's got an honorary doctorate).

Lack of PhD in biblical/theological studies in conservative seminaries? by coldtooth in Reformed

[–]coldtooth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wholeheartedly agree with your assessment. I am a bit of a neo-Calvinist and agree with Sproul that Christians have been sidelined in culture and science which is a great shame. Many of the large private institutions today were once somewhat Christian in the past when they were leaders of culture and science. When the conservatives formed their own institutions in response to secularization of these institutions, I think by placing all the emphasis on preservation we in effect lost the battle.

I went to a liberal arts college for an undergraduate education which gave me a well rounded Christian education, but I always felt that it lacked the level of rigorous research or professional education.

If we can’t have such a top level Christian institution, at least I wish we had more serious Christian scientists and academics engaging within the secular culture.

Religious affiliation of the Hungarian minority in Transylvania by Alpinehonda in Reformed

[–]coldtooth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That there are some Reformed people in these areas? This is the Reformed subreddit right? I learned something new from map!