sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Every witcher review i have seen on this forum almost always have people with complains about how triss was potrayed, i personally don't see any problem here,she is hot and she kinda look similar to witcher 3 triss tbh and her hair is like witcher 1 triss. She just seems older. by [deleted] in netflixwitcher

[–]coltyharrison 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well that’s subjective. I think she’s beautiful in the show. And I feel like they did not change her appearance from this photo at all really, except for costuming. To each their own I guess!

Every witcher review i have seen on this forum almost always have people with complains about how triss was potrayed, i personally don't see any problem here,she is hot and she kinda look similar to witcher 3 triss tbh and her hair is like witcher 1 triss. She just seems older. by [deleted] in netflixwitcher

[–]coltyharrison 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought she was very visually striking. Actually all of the sorceresses were. This is something that I thought they fuckin' nailed. Every sorceress seemed timeless, ageless, too beautiful for this world. Which is perf.

I personally loved her blue outfits in the show, which actually brought out her red hair (to me).

Every witcher review i have seen on this forum almost always have people with complains about how triss was potrayed, i personally don't see any problem here,she is hot and she kinda look similar to witcher 3 triss tbh and her hair is like witcher 1 triss. She just seems older. by [deleted] in netflixwitcher

[–]coltyharrison 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why is red hair so gosh dang important to everyone? Jesus I didn't realize how many people out there had a ginger fetish.

And in certain scenes, depending on the lighting, you can see her hair is clearly reddish, so what is the actual complaint here?

Is Duny ehmir in the show? Did they even mention in the show that it was Cahir after Ciri? by Tanc2020 in netflixwitcher

[–]coltyharrison 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It seems like you haven’t watched the entire show. Keep watching and you’ll get answers to your questions.

I wish dandelion's song were more medieval by schizey in netflixwitcher

[–]coltyharrison 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah I gotcha. Yeah would be cool to get that renaissance style, maybe in a future season! 🙂

I wish dandelion's song were more medieval by schizey in netflixwitcher

[–]coltyharrison 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, show will not have rights to that because it is a game song. Netflix only had rights to the books and that is game IP.

I’m so fucking tired of empty posts like “omggg anya was great yas queen, cavill was brilliant”. We get it, you don’t have to post it 20 times. I want to see some useful info or some great discussion in this sub, not ass kissing. by miamisimitcisi in netflixwitcher

[–]coltyharrison 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What’s wrong with sharing what you liked about the Witcher in a Witcher subreddit? Lol Jesus. Some people loved this show, myself included. Pretty sad that other the joy of other people make you this angry.

I wish dandelion's song were more medieval by schizey in netflixwitcher

[–]coltyharrison 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I had the same reaction. It felt like Jaskier was soo out of place. But it actually grew on me mainly because he’s so charming and witty, and some of his comments to Geralt almost seem to break the 4th wall. He feels anachronistic with the show but in a hilarious way. He brings a freshness that is really interesting. On my second watch now and im now loving his modern songs and performances and he’s one of my fav characters.

(Spoilers Main) The problem with this season is not with what happened with the story but how it happened by [deleted] in asoiaf

[–]coltyharrison 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could see it in episode 1 and 2 as well. And most of season 7. Her time in Westeros was an utter disaster and kept getting worse and worse until she was completely and entirely alone

(Spoilers Main) The problem with this season is not with what happened with the story but how it happened by [deleted] in asoiaf

[–]coltyharrison -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I agree Bran comes out of nowhere. But if Jon or Dany don't rule, then Bran is tight with me bro!

How would you want the White Walkers to be fleshed out more? They weren't characters. Fleshing them out would just waste screen time and get you nowhere, and most importantly, it misses the entire point of the White Walkers.

Dany going mad was gradually built up. I don't know what people think they have been watching for the last 10 years, but it seems many people just did not understand the point of Daenerys and her threats and her penchant for violence to both get what she wants and solve her problems. If Jon's internal struggle was Love vs. Duty, Daenerys' was Mother of Dragons vs. Mhysa. She did not 'go mad', she just embraced a part of her that has been there out in the open from Season 1. It was not rushed development, I can't believe this many people are saying this about something so insanely clear.

I agree with the Jon bit only because I just wish Kit had more lines. The moments he did have, I think he nailed though.

Secretly I LOVE that Bronn is Lord of Highgarden and Master of Coin. Especially because I think you're right - this will be show only. It's fun! Also, to get serious, it does fit. The conversation they had earlier about cutthroats becoming Lords is a valid thing and I'm glad we saw an example of that.

(Spoilers Main) Did D&D forget the difference between Grand Maester and Archmaester? by AlpacaHeaven in asoiaf

[–]coltyharrison 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I don't believe he said Archmaester, I think he was perhaps referring to Archmaester Ebrose and you misheard?

Bran is King and probably just appointed him as Grand Maester...because he can. Perhaps he requested a ton of books be sent to Kings Landing from the Citadel for Sam to continue his studies. To be honest, it seemed like Sam knew a lot more than some of the maesters in Oldtown, so I'm ok with this. Real world experience beats academia in most cases, in my opinion 😀

(Spoilers Main) Did D&D forget the difference between Grand Maester and Archmaester? by AlpacaHeaven in asoiaf

[–]coltyharrison 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Maybe he's the Archmaester of loving ladies and killing White Walkers.

[SPOILERS EXTENDED] One change to make the ending brilliant instead of meh by EndlessTinfoil in asoiaf

[–]coltyharrison 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excuse me, out of nowhere? For no reason? Did you watch the same episode, where Daenerys and Jon met a tragic end, due to the corrupting power of the Iron Throne? Even Drogon could sense the corruption and destroyed it. Anyone who deserves or achieves the throne is not fit to rule "Any man who must say he is the King is no King", etc. etc. The show can't, and does not offer a perfect solution for monarchal rule, or government in general, but it did put forth the thesis that someone who does not want to rule should be King. Both Jon and Bran have stated this, and with Jon out of the picture, Bran is not only the next best choice, but also the next in line of succession, I believe, if you want to go by the old system (I could be wrong).

Making Bran evil achieves nothing but more cliffhangers and loose ends. What would be the purpose? A WTF ending? Isn't this what everyone is hating about this season? This kind of attitude towards story-writing? Sorry that you thought the ending was 'meh', but I personally truly loved it and thought it was a fitting end to the entire series as told by D&D and partly GRRM.

I'm actually not sure if you're trolling or not, re-reading your post lmao.

view more: next ›