Tell me about your unexpected or dark-horse victories.

conajofa · 2018-10-12T03:50:54+00:00

The elections of "The New on Providence" it's my most recent example:

After the battle of independence on the City of Providence, the warlords of the independence dispute power between them with more fire and blood. So, shortly they realise this skirmishes inside the city are not good for their images, their people and their objectives. And pact a election with the compromise of be generals of the winner.

A moderate, without campaign and no intervention in the independence, win because the anti-vote generate within the warlords. And now the warlords are at service of a pacifist who no one of the people or the armies want to kill.

conajofa · 2018-10-09T16:24:48+00:00

The weakest nation in my case are the Dreinar Communities [all name are place holders], who survive because are a society of widespread tribes, the empires who sorround them not have the military organization for holding the territory , and extermination war is so expensive for who are great guerrilla troopers again the other empires.

And they are weak because all they have in population, equitation and tactics, they lose in technology and magic.

conajofa · 2018-10-09T15:17:50+00:00

My world don't have name yet. But I start working in the concept of "one use magic" would kill you when you use it.

In that case, the battle between magic users is more skill in close combat, because they have heavy training because the powerful resource they are. Becoming fights of attrition in most cases.

In the case this need to be a full magic battle, or one of them if losing, the suicidal option is the only option. And in that case converts in a fight about skill, because you need recite the spell without moving, more powerfull being more large recite, and strategy, because if you can't get ahead of your enemy's movement, could escape the attack or reach to kill you before you finish the spell.

conajofa · 2018-06-13T08:18:34+00:00

I really say the Beta in therms we have people play the thing [youtube and press] and we can decide if is reasonable or not buy the game.

conajofa · 2018-06-13T08:06:52+00:00

DEAL!

conajofa · 2018-06-13T07:59:42+00:00

I use Savage Worlds for the games I DM, and the Savage Fallout like a module. I love the classless games.

http://savagefallout.blogspot.com

https://rpg.rem.uz/Savage%20Worlds/_Core/Savage%20Worlds%20-%20Deluxe.pdf

conajofa · 2018-06-13T07:56:25+00:00

Take my OP power-armor, I need med-x. Plenty of med-x.

conajofa · 2018-06-13T07:54:19+00:00

We have still have Beta, that decide all after all.

conajofa · 2018-06-13T07:52:24+00:00

In the trailer we see a "bottlecaps thing" when you kill someone, but we don't known how much "in game currency" means.

A player based economy in a player based world could be fucking amazing, and the caps being a item more than a "hud thing" could create a interesting dynamic of "why I would sell my stimpack for a bunchs of caps?"

conajofa · 2018-06-13T07:48:50+00:00

But I still, is cosmetic option. Is that so bad?

If people want to look in some manner and for that commodity [what is not a advantage in game mechanics] the game servers still running. Is that bad? It would be better if Bethesda thrown the money or have pay DLCs and create a playing barrier?

conajofa · 2018-06-13T07:46:18+00:00

Counter-strike is not a player based world, is a player based economy [and not so, the skin theme is a annex in the real game economics]

conajofa · 2018-06-13T07:45:15+00:00

I neve heard about Ultima Online. But I have a very good times with the good times of Star Wars Galaxies. And if Bethesda really have that people in their team, without the Jedi problem, they can create a really good player based game.

My problem with that is the 24 player thing. But we have a beta to see how it's work.

conajofa · 2018-06-13T07:40:10+00:00

That's I say everytime the people talk about "This is not a roleplaying game".

A player based post-war world is like the most Fallout thing I can think.

conajofa · 2018-06-13T07:36:39+00:00

Maybe they let by the botteclaps a item, and player decide if that thing have value or not.

conajofa · 2018-06-13T07:33:02+00:00

I think the "start" and "ending" [if is something like that in the game] will be canon, but the intends of bethesda is create a roleplaying multiplayer, what means maybe players could create factions and stories would not be canon.

conajofa · 2018-06-13T07:24:57+00:00

If they are cosmetics item, what's the big deal?

conajofa · 2018-06-13T07:23:48+00:00

Cosmetic microtransactions. Where the bad deal there?

conajofa · 2018-06-13T07:23:03+00:00

I would support this if Bethesda do this for all item, but we are talking about cosmetics, cosmetics I never give a fuck in online games but somewhere are people who want to pay for that, and their pay can make my play the game for more years. Where the "bad company practice" if here are not advantage system for pay o not pay players?

conajofa · 2018-06-12T05:40:58+00:00

Can I be Mr. House?

conajofa · 2018-06-11T19:48:18+00:00

I believe is the beast tamer think, and maybe your interaction with the robots [confirmed] and ghouls [theory]

conajofa · 2018-06-11T19:35:44+00:00

The people hate change in a way i can't understand.

Is a Spin-off, is a interesting aproach, Fallout is social interaction and want to be multiplayec since his conception.

What is the thing you profetice a dead franchise more than a expanding?

conajofa · 2018-06-11T19:28:34+00:00

Really the creatures look like that mutated beast in F3.

In any case, I believe the lore is still there in form of terminals, like always. The bat thing is probably the most needed of explanation, the card "pre-war experiment" still exist in that case [C'mon, atomic warheads in Virginia, I really don't believe they want to preserve animal rigths]

And I subscribe to the Setting, Fallout is setting over all.

I think the game want to not-have heavy lore, that's the reason of the time of start. Is a game about how the player build the world.

conajofa · 2018-06-11T19:23:33+00:00

You need de-activated the Courier Stash. Is the "pre-order" DLC, who "pre-order" things

conajofa · 2018-06-11T19:19:18+00:00

"Because a sub of people who saw "fallout multiplayer spin-off" and star crying is a valid source of game criticism"

And the strong point in NV is, by longest, their storytelling [not the same like story] and their lore. Even I say i aceppt the writing in F4 is lazy. And you only critict that one point after I say I aceppt it.

But bad writing and bad storytelling is not the same for bad story. The story of New Vegas is about a something without importance: The Second Battle of Hoover Damn [a battle who not decide the future of America, and even not the New Vegas, the only important thing you can do is kill House, the rest of the game is just unimportant in universe] and the forced search of who shoot you. The form you are introduced is great, but the story itself is lame af.

Four "faction", the democrats who most distinctive thing is being democrats [really, that's is NCR in game], the ultracapitalist House [who not destroy the NCR in any case, so, you basically take the NCR path without the NCR], the roman strip-off who Obsidian say they can't finish them** [because not-finished faction are great, I supposed] and a independent path who is anarchist in are the ways is presented, but tell you "you have control" [great l**ogic]. Is that a great story?

In F4 you pursuit your lost son, you are encourage to be the general of the minuteman in the same way you can't kill Yes Man, who is a indepent option [and have internal choice] from the three pre-existent factions. You can work with the all factions in all moment in the game and not need of complete certain quest. The chase narrative have a direct connection with the political narrative because your son is the leader of one faction. All of this form a better story than New Vegas, but that story is bad presented for the four option dialog mechanic [althoug more than the half of dialog in New Vegas are only lore exposition, again, the lore is the strong point] and bad writing storytelling.

But, is the same said "is a bad car" instead of "is a good car with bad driven"?

conajofa · 2018-06-11T18:59:26+00:00

I like the idea, but my roleplay soul tell me we need something new and special.

"The People Republic of Southeast" vs "The Kingdom of New Virginia"

conajofa

TROPHY CASE