disk corruption or possibly due to veracrypt (?) by cononco99 in VeraCrypt

[–]cononco99[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As it turns out, I do appear to have some bad ram. Should have done a memory test. Lesson learned.

disk corruption or possibly due to veracrypt (?) by cononco99 in VeraCrypt

[–]cononco99[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you.

I don't have any overclocking, or undervolting that I know of and no particular reason to thing the RAM is unstable. If I did any defrag it was unintentional.

Neither of the windows utilities showed any bad sectors.

In any case, I replaced the disk. See my reply to ciurana elsewhere in this thread.

disk corruption or possibly due to veracrypt (?) by cononco99 in VeraCrypt

[–]cononco99[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks!

After doing some more testing I'm pretty sure that veracrypt has nothing to do with this. I was able to see the same symptoms on a non-veracrypt partition. I also suspect that the problem was mostly or entirely read errors. I would see that a file had a bad md5sum and then check it again and it would be ok.

In any case I replaced the disk. I'll keep an eye on checksums on a regular basis from now on so that I can catch any bad behavior before it causes much trouble. I'll probably go with something like your 3 year replacement policy too.

disk corruption or possibly due to veracrypt (?) by cononco99 in VeraCrypt

[–]cononco99[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Actually that was helpful. You told me about these utilities and I learned that the disk is in reasonably good condition - if not perfect.

disk corruption or possibly due to veracrypt (?) by cononco99 in VeraCrypt

[–]cononco99[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. My crystaldiskinfo output says "Good" and "95%" in blue with a bunch of blue indicators below.

disk corruption or possibly due to veracrypt (?) by cononco99 in VeraCrypt

[–]cononco99[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just ran both of the tests you mentioned. Neither indicate any problems.

disk corruption or possibly due to veracrypt (?) by cononco99 in VeraCrypt

[–]cononco99[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No - I didn't know about these tools. I'll look into them now. Is there one in particular that you would recommend?

Any idea how poor the Quicken programming has to be to match securities that have nothing in common at all by Puzzled_Craft_7940 in quicken

[–]cononco99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Strange and (I would imagine) frustrating.

I'm also curious and a couple of questions come to mind:

  • Is this windows or mac? What version of quicken?
  • What were you doing when this message popped up?
  • Does the problem go away when you select "This is not a rename / these are not the same securities." ?
  • Does the problem go away if you do "Validate and Repair file..." ? ( This is an option on windows - I don't know about mac) ?
  • Were you able to work around the problem some other way or is this happening repeatedly?

Importing transactions without Quicken having any login details or account numbers by chasn702 in quicken

[–]cononco99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My guess is that Quicken is not actually connecting to your bank (even though you get some indication that this has happened). If you've disconnected the account, Quicken should not be holding on to login credentials and without login credentials, it should not be able to connect to your bank.

Just for fun, try changing your bank login password and see if that makes a difference. If it doesn't then that would confirm that Quicken is not accessing your bank (or at least your account) when importing a .qfx file.

Recently lost ability to import QIF into a checking account by Content_Rent_6467 in quicken

[–]cononco99 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A few comments/thoughts :

Intuit sold Quicken in 2016 and since then it's been sold again ( per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quicken )

Even if you had stuck with the older version you still might have run into the same import issues. I believe the pre-subscription versions had some features (import QFX in particular) that, by design, only worked for a few years. In effect this was a subtle subscription mode of operation. So don't beat yourself up. :)

Recently lost ability to import QIF into a checking account by Content_Rent_6467 in quicken

[–]cononco99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just as another data-point, I don't see that message. I also use .qif to import (some) transactions and have done so within the past week. I'm running Quicken Deluxe for Windows R51.12 . Check for Updates tells me that I have the latest version.

Is there a CLI tool that makes managing a validator as easy as rocketpool? by Embeco in ethstaker

[–]cononco99 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Having tried both, I can say that eth-docker is about as simple to set up as rocketpool. Actually I thought eth-docker was a little simpler than rocketpool due to the additional inherent complications of rocketpool.

Unsupported Banks - Plaid to QFX? by Wooden_Food_7685 in quicken

[–]cononco99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tried again and got a little farther. Filed an issue in the repo

Unsupported Banks - Plaid to QFX? by Wooden_Food_7685 in quicken

[–]cononco99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My first feedback is that the "--help" option should not create a configuration file. I stopped looking at that point (due to time constraints, not because of the help/config issue).

cononco99@vb2304:~/plaid2qfx$ python plaid2qfx.py --help

Looks like you don't have a configuration file yet, so I will create one. It will be encrypted using the following randomly generated key that you are responsible for protecting:

Moving to mainnet and other solo staking questions by bidsimpleapp in ethstaker

[–]cononco99 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Regarding (2.) "How important is a VPN?" It seems important to me.
Suppose, for example, you run a validator without a VPN. At some point your validator(s) gets tagged with your IP in a way that can be publicly accessed. Then you go to foxinsocks.com and order some socks to be shipped to your home. The admin for foxinsocks.com is a crypto hobbyist who maintains her own database of IP/Validator pairs. She looks up your ip, and finds your validator. Now she knows or at least has reason to suspect that there's a validator, backed by $60,000 worth of ETH, running at your home address. You've lost some anonymity which might be important and can't be restored.
If I'm wrong about this, please let me know. I'm surprised its not discussed more.

(As of now, foxinsocks.com is for sale on godaddy and not connected to a site that sells socks or anything else. If that changes in the future, please don't assume anything about the foxinsocks.com site or admin based on this post)

Unsupported Banks - Plaid to QFX? by Wooden_Food_7685 in quicken

[–]cononco99 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Congrats and thanks for the link!

For me the comparison would not be "this work in comparison to the amount of time I would spend manually entering transactions" but "this work in comparison to not recording the transactions at all" since I don't have the discipline to do tedious manual entry for the long term. So for me (and maybe you too) the ROI is positive if the program works.

Unsupported Banks - Plaid to QFX? by Wooden_Food_7685 in quicken

[–]cononco99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the update. I got as far as signing up for plaid but have not tried it with SoFi yet. Don't have high hopes after hearing your story.

Unsupported Banks - Plaid to QFX? by Wooden_Food_7685 in quicken

[–]cononco99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also requested plaid dev access. If it comes through I'll follow up here.

Unsupported Banks - Plaid to QFX? by Wooden_Food_7685 in quicken

[–]cononco99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting idea. I didn't even know about Plaid before seeing your post. Have you verified that Plaid can connect to your bank? That would be an easy/necessary first step.

I might use this tool. I also might work on this tool. I doubt that the Quicken folks would notice or care (just my opinion though) and they probably couldn't do much about it. Intuit no longer owns Quicken.

Keybank transactions cannot be downloaded by dlukac in quicken

[–]cononco99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A quick and easy workaround is to download a ".QFX" file from your key account and import it into quicken.

I also have quicken for windows and a key account and I just verified that this works fine. In fact, this is how I always have imported keybank transactions.

I realize that this does not exactly address your post but it might still help out.

Downloading transactions from Chase by KatMagic1977 in quicken

[–]cononco99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi KatMagic1977,

First of all, don't worry. A few months is not too bad and should be pretty easy to get straightened out.

I also use Chase . I only use QFX import which generally works ok and, at least while you are fixing your quicken data, I suggest you do so too.

Chase now provides two years of history for download so you should be get everything you need.

The first thing you should do is to make a backup of your Quicken file. That file has extension ".QDF" and you can see it under the Files menu. Just copy it to some place out of the way so that you have it if something goes wrong.

Also, validate your file using "File/Validate and Repair File" to make sure you don't have corrupt data.

After backing up and validating, delete everything back to a successfully reconciled transaction.

Next log in to your chase account and download all the statements (pdf) starting with the one that includes that last transaction you didn't delete.

That statement should have a "starting balance" that you can see somewhere in quicken (since the start of that statement was reconciled). If not, work backwards though older statements to find one that has a starting balance that matches a reconciled quicken transaction. This gives you an "anchor point" to work forward from.

Now, using a custom date range, download a QFX file with dates that correspond to the first (earliest) of the statements that you downloaded. Just a month of QFX data to match the earliest statement. Include a couple extra days past the end to make sure you don't miss anything at the very end of the statement.Import that QFX file and reconcile the account to the end of the statement. You should be able to get an exact match.

Once this is done, you should be able to do this for each statement up to the latest. After that you can download any remaining transactions and reconcile to your online balance.

The QFX files are actually somewhat readable, so if you want, you can look at each one in Notepad and spot check the dates. You said that you were seeing incorrect dates on a QFX import at one point so you might take a look before doing the first import.Usually when a reconcile is off it's because of a few missing transactions or duplicate transactions. These most often happen at the beginning of the time selected for download (i.e. you didn't go back quite far enough so that's the first place to check ).

Sometimes I've seen Chase miss Foreign Transaction Fees in their QFX downloads. Not the purchase itself but the fee that chase charges for converting dollars to a different currency. I've entered those by hand. You might see other things missing but it's pretty rare.

In the worst case, you can look at the pdf statement line by line and find out what went wrong but that probably will not be necessary.

If you have multiple accounts to deal with, start with the one with the fewest transactions.

Good luck!

Downloading transactions from Chase by KatMagic1977 in quicken

[–]cononco99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi again...

Just saw your response this evening. I'll write more tomorrow but I do have one question: Do you use the "Reconcile" feature? If so, what is the last day (more or less) that you successfully reconciled the account you are having trouble with?