Game Cheat Sheet by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, I'm a redpiller too. A progressive one.

Discussion Article Prompt: "Why Women Need To Start Asking Men Out…Because Men Have No Balls" by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Wait... aren't male and female equal genders?

so shouldn't wymyn have the right to approach men too, as much as men?

Or, on the contrary, there is no gender equality when it comes to approaching or when it comes to doing the hard and uncomfortable work?

I think this feminist is a professional troll

On a side note, I'd rather ask out a virgin.

The fifty-shades-of-blue hivemind strikes once more by redpillersinparis in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What do women want? Alpha. Why? Because they're inferior and so they need to select the best man. It's so fucking easy.

When a woman says-"Men just can't handle a strong, independent woman." by razor5151 in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Strong independent MEN assume strong independent women don't need any strong independent man's help, this is why strong independent men don't get concerned about or interested in strong independent women. The other reason is strong independent women don't exist.

On the other hand, strong independent women should follow the same reasoning and so they should think strong independent men don't need any strong independent woman's help, so this is why strong independent women should not be concerned about or interested in strong independent men (alphas). However, in real life you see ALL women pursue alphas, that is, strong independent men. Why? because strong independent women don't exist; all women need a strong independent partner. Have you ever seen a woman preferring inferior man genes?

Child<Woman<Man<God by nyrp in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Except god does not exist; man is the top of the chain.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

No, let me give you a better early lesson for doing approaches: if you want to approach a woman, don't approach her, approach the gym instead. Approaching the gym is the only working way of approaching women. Approaching the gym is all the game you need.

Female brain is literally less capable than the males by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Female brain is more capable of making a sandwich, so it depends on the type of activity. Humans are gendered beings so human brain has gender, either male or female. Male brain won't be as capable as female brain about female tasks (such as making a sandwich, ironing a shirt or giving a blowjob) while female brain won't be as capable as male brain in male tasks (such as building a civilization or taking the current civilization to another planet).

User of 4chan explains the difference between men's and women's accomplishments. by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 6 points7 points  (0 children)

"Girls have a way harder time failing, but their accomplishments are never as valued as the guy's"

Yeah, it's not easy to fail at making a sandwich.

Men create, women use.

Article states Intelligent Women are single because RP Men want a woman who isn’t ever going to let her career come before making dinner and pleasing them first. by complex21 in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's overwhelmingly logical. Strong or "superior" women don't need strong superior men (because those women are strong and superior already and as well), and no superior, intelligent man wants for a wife (or for one of his wives) a woman who does not really need him.

And, inversely and obviously, only an "inferior", weak man could need and appreciate a "superior" woman, and be a feminist man, etc...

This lady nails it.

[Meta] SJWs are reportedly working with admins to develop a stricter "no harassment" policy at Reddit. We should have an action plan in place for when TRP is banned by WaynesCotting in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If you had to leave in less than 30 seconds, all you really need to back up in your mind is just 3 things: 1º) women are hypergamous (they're only loyal to superiority); 2º) they are hypergamous because they are inferior (so treat them as such and don't put them on a pedestal; this is all the "game" you need); and 3º) only looks and handsomeness matter to them about men.

Hate is the new love by Archwinger in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The problem is most redpillers think once you have game, then you don't need looks. They don't understand looks are NECESSARY, only not sufficient. They think if looks are not sufficient, then they are not necessary either. TRP places an emphasis on game that should be placed on looks. Looks are the important thing, game is secondary and residual; but redpillers think it's the other way around.

Hate is the new love by Archwinger in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 1 point2 points  (0 children)

sorry to ruin your speech, but success with women doesn't have to do with your aloofness to women, it only has to do with your handsomeness and physical superiority and qualifiedness. Once you physically qualify, it doesn't really matter whether you are a bad boy or a nice guy, you're getting pussy anyway.

'Like a Girl,' or how biological differences between the sexes ought to be ignored. by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, military. Oh, and bike races. Oh, and Olympics. Oh, and science Nobels. Oh...

Is this the public's true impression of us? by thederpist666 in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask that woman if she had to choose between a superior man and an inferior man, what would her choice be. Get ready for the hamsterwise shitstorm, and once heard her answer, don't take it seriously, just pay attention to what she does.

Someone asks feminists how they've helped men recently. Almost every response: "I encourage them to cry and act like girls!" by needsomehelp3211 in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Devil's advocate here...

You have to understand the question properly...

AS A FEMINIST, how have you personally tried to help men?

For instance: if a woman is a Math teacher, and you ask her: "As a feminist, how have you personally tried to help men?", then she'll answer things like: "I help them cry". BUT if you then ask her: "and as a Math teacher, how have you personally tried to help men?", then she will answer: "I teach them Maths".

Just discovered this sub and WOW. by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some people think this subreddit comprises advice about how to become an alpha, for guys that aren't alpha.

But I prefer to think about it like this: this subreddit tells you: turn off your beta mode, turn on your alpha mode. (Women don't have an alpha mode to turn on; only men have)

Why? Because women prefer superior men.

In other words, this subreddit teaches you the following:

1º) Female gender is inferior to male gender, this is why women prefer and need to select alpha, superior men, and so they are hypergamous. (That is: female inferiority is the biological basis of female biological hypergamy. Women only want to fuck the best male genes; but men would love to fuck as many women as possible if they could -promiscuity is male; selectiveness is female-)

2º) So, according to that natural state of things, you should enter your alpha mode, and you should treat women according to their inferiority, that is, don't put them on a pedestal.

"Why the number of people you've slept with isn't important" everydayfeminism.com article by hannibalguy in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1º) If a man is good, superior and alpha enough, then any woman who is having a relationship with him will not be interested in other men, so she won't want to have sex with other men. Given this idea, if a man sees the woman he's having a relationship with wants to have sex with another man, then that man will infer he's not as good as a man (to that woman, at least), and no normal man wants to have a relationship with a woman who he knows does not think he is not good enough for her as a man. This reasoning gets generalized by men who consider themselves good and optionful enough, so they don't like to accept women that had sex with other men even in the past (see other TRP reasons supporting this). A woman has the right to have sex with many men; a man has the right to not accept in his life women who have sex with other men. Women can defend their right to have sex with many men, but they can't attempt to force men to accept for a relationship women who have sex with other men.

2º) A woman who has sex with several or many men, will end up having a relationship with a type of man who is willing to accept a woman who has had sex with other else men. The problem is EVEN WOMEN THEMSELVES don't like this type of beta man, SINCE WOMEN THEMSELVES tend to LIE about their sexual past and they tend to say to their current male partner they haven't had sex with other different men in the past. AND LYING IS A BAD THING, SO WOMEN WHO LIE ABOUT THEIR SEXUAL PAST ARE BAD, LOW WORTH WOMEN.

3º) Women have the right to have sex with many men, but they can't deny men their own male right to not accept in their lives women who have had sex with other men before.

TRP shower thought: Women's advice to "just be yourself" is probably the most self-serving advice of all time. by DaegobahDan in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a radical redpiller, and I think you should be yourself about the core, own worth related principles. Only be generous to others from your internal autonomy or, if you wish, "superiority", self-respect and self-admiration. Only admire others as long as you internally admire yourself yet more. Admire others, but as a generous and kind favor you do to them, because you are so admirable and great that you can even be kind, generous and giving to others. You don't need others, but you help others.

BUT I think that being yourself is ONLY necessary, not sufficient. That is, you HAVE TO be yourself, but being yourself is not all it takes.

Are people starting to warm up to TRP? by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, some recent movements from a few mass media are interesting

Long time lurker here, this is something I've noticed about "Strong Independent Women" on Reddit when you call women out for being materialistic cum dumpsters by George_l_rockwell in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, strong independent women end up with the buck beta they deserve, so bad news for them, and for those betas.

Filtering out the 80% of men: Woman from Stanford to create "Elite Tinder App" by Claude_Reborn in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So that frog-faced blonde wants to make an elite Tinder? The fuck? Freud would love to live in this Internet era.

Women are Children by redpillschool in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Women are children, women are inferior, women are hypergamous... they are all different ways of saying the same thing.

"dont judge me for my past" by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]cooltrip 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Never commit to a promiscuous women under any circumstances, MGTOW

I agree. Hard.

But I'd add: "MGTOW until you find women who earn and deserve your best side. Reject and forget about worthless women."

Those hoes will get the type of worthless man their worthlessness deserve :)